Abstract:Perceptual and Motor Skills, Ahead of Print. Driving a car requires a complex combination of various cognitive functions (e.g., visual perception, motor control, decision making, and others), and deficits in any of these processes may compromise driving safety. Amongst these, executive functions such as inhibitory control, task switching, and decision-making are important, as they enable drivers to process information from their surroundings and respond appropriately to changing road conditions. Although previous research has focused on laboratory measures of individual executive functions, it remains unclear whether performance on such laboratory tests readily translates to actual on-the-road driving performance, especially since drivers' skill levels can vary widely, based on their driving frequency. To this end, we divided 30 participants into two categories based on their driving frequency (i.e., daily commuter vs. weekend only drivers), and we used three well-known executive functioning tasks (the stop signal task, Iowa gambling task or IGT, and a task-switching test) to see whether scores on these tasks predicted such driving performances and behaviors such as braking time, lane-keeping, speed limit violations, and inter-vehicle distance (e.g., in a driving simulator). Participants went through a follow-lead-car scenario in the driving simulator for 20 minutes and then completed the three executive tasks. We found that stop signal reaction time (SSRT) best predicted driving performance, and remained predictive against driver distraction, as well as variabilities in driving frequency. The IGT predicted speed limit violations in high-frequency drivers, whereas task-switching cost predicted lane keeping performance in low-frequency drivers. Together, these results highlight the importance of driving frequency when considering correlates between executive functions and driving performance and behavior. They also imply that executive tasks better predict driving performance in low-frequency (or inexperienced) drivers, while driver temperament (i.e., impulsiveness as indicated by IGT) better predicted driving performance in high-frequency (or experienced) drivers.

Investigating Individual Driver Performance: Applying Dea on Simulator Data

[Information on the 7th International Congress of Mucosal Immunity].

Physiological Indicators of Driver Workload During Car-Following Scenarios and Takeovers in Highly Automated Driving

Driving simulator scenarios and measures to faithfully evaluate risky driving behavior: A comparative study of different driver age groups

In situ ultraviolet Raman spectroscopy of the reduction of chromia on alumina catalysts.

Adaptive Performance Assessment For Drivers Through Behavioral Advantage

Driver Attention Assessment Using Physiological Measures from EEG, ECG, and EDA Signals

Driving Frequency Modulates Correlations Between Executive Functions and Driving Performance: A Driving Simulator Study

Investigating Personalized Driving Behaviors in Dilemma Zones: Analysis and Prediction of Stop-or-Go Decisions

Self-Perception Versus Objective Driving Behavior: Subject Study of Lateral Vehicle Guidance

A Novel Integrated Decision-Making Evaluation Method Towards ICV Testing Involving Multiple Driving Experience Factors

Cohort-Based Analysis Structure for Modeling Driver Behavior with an In-Vehicle Data Recorder

Driver Evaluation and Identification Based on Driving Behavior Data

Validating self-reported driving behaviours as determinants of real-world driving speeds

A discrete-event simulation model for driver performance assessment: application to autonomous vehicle cockpit design optimization

A Study on the Development of Driver Behavior Simulation Dummy for the Performance Evaluation of Driver Monitoring System

Characterizing driver behavior using naturalistic driving data

Classification of longitudinal driving behaviour based on simulator study

Correlation Analysis of In-Vehicle Sensors Data and Driver Signals in Identifying Driving and Driver Behaviors

The validity of driving simulation for assessing differences between in-vehicle informational interfaces: A comparison with field testing.

Assessments of Risky Driving: A Go/No-Go Simulator Driving Task to Evaluate Risky Decision-making and Associated Behavioral Patterns