Abstract:Background: Peritoneal dialysis (PD) is a home-based kidney replacement therapy (KRT) performed in people with kidney failure. PD can be performed by manual filling and draining of the abdominal cavity, i.e. continuous ambulatory PD (CAPD), or using a device connected to the PD catheter that is programmed to perform PD exchanges, i.e. automated PD (APD). APD is considered to have several advantages over CAPD, such as a lower incidence of peritonitis, fewer mechanical complications, and greater psychosocial acceptability. Acknowledging the increasing uptake of APD in incident and prevalent patients undergoing PD, it is important to re-evaluate the evidence on the comparative clinical and patient-reported outcomes of APD compared to CAPD. This is an update of a Cochrane review published in 2007. Objectives: To compare clinical and patient-reported outcomes of APD to CAPD in people with kidney failure. Search methods: In this update, we searched the Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Register of Studies until 29 August 2024. Studies in the Register are identified through searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE, conference proceedings, the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) Search Portal, and ClinicalTrials.gov. Selection criteria: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing APD with CAPD in adults (≥ 18 years) with kidney failure. Data collection and analysis: Two authors independently screened the search results and extracted data. Data synthesis was performed using random-effects meta-analyses, expressing effect estimates as risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for dichotomous data and mean differences (MD) with 95% CIs for continuous data. Certainty in the evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. Main results: Two RCTs (131 randomised people) comparing APD with CAPD were included in this update. One RCT had a follow-up of six months, and one RCT had a follow-up of 24 months. The risk of bias in the included studies was mostly low, except for the high risk of performance bias for subjective outcomes. The evidence is very uncertain about the effect of APD compared to CAPD on death, hospitalisations, PD-related peritonitis, change of dialysis modality, residual kidney function, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), overhydration, blood pressure, exit-site infections, tunnel infections, mechanical complications, PD catheter removal, or dialysis adequacy measures. These results were largely based on low to very low certainty evidence; hence, caution is warranted when drawing conclusions. Authors' conclusions: Insufficient evidence exists to decide between APD and CAPD in kidney failure patients with regard to clinical and patient-reported outcomes. Therefore, current evidence is insufficient as a guide for clinical practice. Given that the sample sizes of existing studies are generally small with insufficient follow-up, there is a need for large-scale, multicentre studies. Future research should focus on possible differences between APD and CAPD in residual kidney function, euvolaemia, and patient-reported outcomes such as HRQoL, symptoms, patient satisfaction and life participation.

Automated Peritoneal Dialysis is Suitable for Polycystic Kidney Disease Patients with End-Stage Renal Disease

Peritoneal Dialysis for Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease: a Retrospective Study

New applications of automated peritoneal dialysis

Comparative Study of Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis and Hemodialysis on Polycystic Kidney Disease Patients

Outcome of autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease patients on peritoneal dialysis: a national retrospective study based on two French registries (the French Language Peritoneal Dialysis Registry and the French Renal Epidemiology and Information Network)

Automated Peritoneal Dialysis in Urgent-Start Dialysis ESRD Patients: Safety and Dialysis Adequacy.

Refractory ascites due to portal hypertension in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) patients successfully treated with peritoneal dialysis.

Peritoneal Dialysis Care for People with Diabetes, Polycystic Kidney Disease, or Advanced Liver Disease

Automated peritoneal dialysis versus continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis for people with kidney failure

The Role of an Integrated Care Model for Kidney Disease in the Development of Peritoneal Dialysis: A Single-Center Experience in China

Comparative analysis of peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis for the management of kidney failure: A concise review

Peritoneal Dialysis Treatment Modality Option in Acute Kidney Injury

Acute Peritoneal Dialysis is an Efficient and Reliable Alternative Therapy in Preterm Neonates with Acute Kidney Injury

Assisted Peritoneal Dialysis: a Feasible KRT Modality for Frail Older Patients with End-Stage Kidney Disease (ESKD).

Supine PCNL in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease

Percutaneous Insertion of Peritoneal Dialysis Catheters

Assisted peritoneal dialysis as a method of choice for elderly with end-stage renal disease

Application of automated peritoneal dialysis in urgent-start peritoneal dialysis patients during the break-in period

APD or CAPD: one glove does not fit all

Urgent Start Peritoneal Dialysis: A Viable Option for Acute and Chronic Kidney Failure

Risk Factors for Loss of Residual Renal Function in Children with End-Stage Renal Disease Undergoing Automatic Peritoneal Dialysis