On David Gauthier's Morals by Agreement

陈真
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1003-7071.2004.03.014
2004-01-01
Abstract:In his Morals by Agreement, David Gauthier intends to develop a theory of practical rationality related to each individual's pursuit of his or her own interest or ends but from which moral principles can be derived. The question for Gauthier is: how could rational agents, each concerned with maximizing his or her own interest or ends, agree to cooperate or accept an agreement to constrain their maximizing activities, and comply with the agreement even though each of them could do better by not cooperating or not complying? Gauthier tries to argue that, (1) in interaction, facing the problems exemplified in Prisoner's Dilemma-type situations, rational agents need, and thus accept, impartial constraints on rational agreements on their individual maximizing activities to avoid the suboptimal problem and achieve mutual benefits; (2) it is rational for those agents to comply with those constraints or agreements once made. Gauthier's arguments are more successful in Iterated Prisoner's Dilemma situations than in one time Prisoner's Dilemma situations. However, his theory still has some limitations.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?