Abstract:The structure and stabilization mechanism of laminar nonpremixed autoignitive DME/air coflow flames was investigated at elevated temperatures and pressures. Computations with detailed chemistry were performed for DME and heated coflow air at 30 atm with uniform inlet velocities (2.4, 3.2, and 8.0 m/s) imposed for both streams. The heat release rate profiles are first examined for each case to demonstrate a multibrachial thermal structure. Species concentrations and temperature were sampled along mixture fraction iso-contours, and Chemical Explosive Mode Analysis (CEMA) was performed to identify the controlling chemistry at representative points. One-dimensional Lagrangian Flamelet Analysis (LFA) was also performed and compared with the two-dimensional computations to elucidate the relative importance of diffusion processes parallel and normal to the mixture fraction gradient. Various coflow temperatures with different inlet velocities are examined to elucidate their influences on the multibrachial structure as well as the stabilization mechanism. NTC (negative temperature coefficient)-affected inhomogeneous autoignition and the coupled effects with premixed flame propagation on stabilization are further studied. It is found that, at high coflow boundary temperatures or low inlet velocities, the classical tribrachial flame structure is achieved, and autoignition contributes less to the stabilization due to reduced heat and radical accumulation. The kinematic balance between the local flow speed and flame propagation speed is the dominant stabilization mechanism. On the contrary, kinetic stabilization is achieved at lower coflow temperatures or higher inlet velocities as autoignition becomes dominant. Due to the transition of the dominant chemical pathways during autoignition, the kinetically stabilized structure is usually multibrachial. The transition of different stabilization mechanisms can be made by changing either the boundary velocity or temperature of the coflow. Based on these results and previous work (Deng et al., 2015)[12], a regime diagram is constructed that identifies the possible stabilization regimes: blow out, kinetically stabilized, autoignition-propagation-coupled stabilized, kinematically stabilized, and burner stabilized. (C) 2015 The Combustion Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Stabilization Mechanisms and Burning Rates of Cylindrical Burner Flames

On Burner-Stabilized Cylindrical Premixed Flames in Microgravity

On the structure, stabilization, and dual response of flat-burner flames

Influence Of Burner Rim Aerodynamics On Polyhedral Flames And Flame Stabilization

Duality, Pulsating Instability, and Product Dissociation in Burner-Stabilized Flames

Microgravity Burner-Generated Spherical Diffusion Flames: Experiment and Computation

Studies of Flame Structure in Microgravity

The Impacts of Three Flamelet Burning Regimes in Nonlinear Combustion Dynamics

On the Spreading of Unsteady Cylindrical Diffusion Flames

On the Response of Spherical Premixed Flames under Rotation

Structure and Propagation of Turbulent Premixed Flames Astabilized in a Stagnation Flow

Stabilization Mechanism of Burner-attached Flames in Laminar Non-premixed Jets

Physical and Chemical Processes in Flames

On Adiabatic Stabilization and Geometry of Bunsen Flames

Flame Dynamics and Chemistry in LRE Combustion Instability

Stabilization of Laminar Nonpremixed DME/air Coflow Flames at Elevated Temperatures and Pressures

Numerical Study on the Stabilization of a Self-Sustaining Steady-State Premixed Cool Flame

A Numerical Study of the Stabilisation of A Lean Laminar Premixed V-Shaped Flame

Experimental study on the structure and stabilization of inverted flames

MORPHOLOGY AND BURNING RATES OF EXPANDING SPHERICAL FLAMES IN H 2 / O 2 / INERT MIXTURES UP TO 60 ATMOSPHERES

Creeping Flame Spread along Fuel Cylinders in Forced and Natural Flows and Microgravity