Research on the Impact of EVA on Inefficient Investment of Chinese Central Enterprises
Pei-yu OU,Jun-qin SUN
DOI: https://doi.org/10.19616/j.cnki.bmj.2018.05.001
2018-01-01
Abstract:Inefficiency investment is usually caused by the investment behavior that is not aimed at the maximization of the shareholders'value in the investment decision. Investment behavior of managers is closely related to the performance measurement method which can affect the investment efficiency of the company. Due to the separation of ownership and management rights, principle-agent problem is very common in modern company. Because of the difference of utility of shareholders and managers, when choosing investment projects, managers often make decisions that probably harm shareholders' wealth because of their pursuit of personal utility,resulting in inefficient investment including overinvestment and underinvestment. Among all kinds of economic entities in China, Chinese central enterprises play an important and special role. To a large extent,their investment efficiency influence China's overall economy. Because of the special property right system of central enterprises and the absence of owner, the inefficient investment caused by principle-agent problems of central enterprises are more serious. Economic value added (EVA) is a measure of a company's financial performance based on the residual wealth calculated by deducting its cost of capital from its operating profit, adjusted for taxes on a cash basis. Essentially, it is used to measure the value a company generates from funds invested into it. EVA,as a useful performance indicator,can coordinate the difference between the utility of shareholders and managers,then restrain inefficient investment which caused by the principle-agent problem. In 2010,Chinese SASAC (State-owned Assets Supervision and Administration) introduced EVA to central enterprises for performance evaluation aims to coordinate the interests of owners and managers and promote the healthy development of central enterprises. Also,SASAC gave the calculation method of EVA based on the Chinese characteristics and the actual situation of Chinese enterprises. In the end of 2012, SASAC revised EVA evaluation method again. So it is important to examine whether EVA does have any positive effect on the decrease of inefficient investment of Chinese central enterprises. This paper selects data of Chinese listed companies held by central enterprises from 2007 to 2015 as the sample, confirms the level of inefficient investment using the Richardson investment model. Then the correlation between the level of inefficient investment and the implement and value of EVA is discussed. Finally, adding the cross term of EVA evaluation revision in 2012 and the value of EVA, the paper explores that if there is positive change of the degree of the correlation between the value of EVA and the level of inefficient investment. Then the paper draws conclusions as follows: First, after the introduction of EVA evaluation by the SASAC in 2010,the level of inefficient investment including overinvestment and underinvestment of central enterprises has decreased significantly. Second, there is significance negative relationship between EVA value and the level of inefficient investment of central enterprise. This finding implies that the reduction of the level of inefficient investment of central enterprises is not only the superficial effect of policy of implementation EVA, but also the real impact of EVA evaluation method. Third, there is no significant change of the correlation between EVA value and the level of inefficient investment after the revision in 2012. It shows that the revision of calculation and application of EVA by SASAC has not achieved significant positive effect and expectations, and the evaluation method of central enterprises needs to be further improved. Based on the above conclusions,the paper offers some policy recommendations from three aspects. First, the differential capital cost for different industry,different scale and different operating risk in central enterprise should be used in calculating EVA. Second,accounting adjustment items of EVA calculation can be improved further. Based on cost/benefit and significance principle,central enterprises can select accounting adjustment items independently. Third, the weight of EVA in comprehensive performance evaluation can be designed reasonably combined with the industry type, the degree of competition, profitability and regional economic environment of central enterprises.