Abstract:Objective:To evaluate the effectiveness of SuperPATH approach in total hip arthroplasty (THA) compared with conventional posterolateral approach. Methods:Between March 2017 and May 2017, 24 patients who planned to have a unilateral THA were enrolled in the study and randomized into 2 groups. Twelve patients were treated with SuperPATH approach (SuperPATH group) and 12 patients with posterolateral approach (control group). There was no significant difference in gender, age, body mass index, the type of disease, complicating diseases, and American Society of Anesthesiologists grading between 2 groups ( P>0.05). The operation time, length of stay, length of incision, and perioperative complications related to operation were recorded. The hemoglobin and hematocrit were recorded; the total blood loss and intraoperative blood loss were calculated. The inflammatory response indicators (C-reactive protein, erythrocyte sedimentation rate) and muscle damage index (creatine kinase) were recorded in both groups. The range of motion, functional score (Harris score), visual analogue scale (VAS) score, and prosthesis position were recorded. Results:Patients in both groups were followed up 1 year. Compared with the control group, the operation time of the SuperPATH group was longer ( t=4.470, P=0.000), and the incision was shorter ( t=-2.168, P=0.041). There was no significant difference in length of stay between 2 groups ( t=0.474, P=0.640). Periprosthetic fracture occurred in 1 case of the SuperPATH group. No other complications, such as infection or deep vein thrombosis, occurred in both groups. There was no significant difference in intraoperative blood loss, total blood loss, hemoglobin and hematocrit before operation and at 1 and 3 days after operation, and C-reactive protein and erythrocyte sedimentation rate before operation and at 1, 3, and 14 days between 2 groups ( P>0.05). For creatine kinase, SuperPATH group at 1 and 3 days were lower than control group ( P<0.05), while no significant difference was found between 2 groups before operation and at 14 days after operation ( P>0.05). For flexion and abduction activity, SuperPATH group at 1 and 3 days after operation were better than the control group ( P<0.05), while no significant difference was found between 2 groups at 14 days, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year after operation ( P>0.05). The Harris and VAS scores of SuperPATH group at 1 and 3 days after operation were better than those of control group ( P<0.05). There was no significant difference in anteversion and abduction between 2 groups ( P>0.05) according to the X-ray film at 1 year. During the follow-up, no loosening or migration was observed. Conclusion:Compared with the posterolateral approach, the SuperPATH approach can reduce muscle damage, relieve early pain, promote recovery, and obtain the similar short-term effectiveness.

A Modified Posterior Repair Via Per-Subperiosteal Stripping and Reattaching a Periosteum-Tendon-capsular Compound Soft Tissue Flap in Total Hip Arthroplasty

Avantage et sécurité de la voie postérieure avec réparation des parties molles pour la pose d’une prothèse totale de hanche de première intention : une méta-analyse

Combined Use of Extensively Porous Coated Femoral Components with Onlay Cortical Strut Allografts in Revision of Vancouver B2 and B3 Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures

Primary total hip arthroplasty with retained articularis

Importance of hip capsular repair in total hip arthroplasty (THA) via the posterior lateral approach: a five year retrospective cohort study

[Double Plating Through Different Approaches for Periprosthetic Femoral Fracture Following Total Knee Arthroplasty].

[Posterior Longitudinal Strip Osteotomy of Proximal Femur in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty].

Effect of Repairing Capsule and Short External Rotators on Postoperative Dislocation Rate Following Pri-Mary Total Hip Arthroplasty

Effectiveness and safety of the posterior approach with soft tissue repair for primary total hip arthroplasty: a meta-analysis.

Prevention of Prothesis Dislocation after the Revision of Total Hip Arthroplasty

[Randomized Controlled Trial of Comparison Between the SuperPATH and Posterolateral Approaches in Total Hip Arthroplasty].

Anatomical and Tensile Mechanical Analysis of Hip Joint Capsule Repair in Total Hip Replacement

Surgical injury and repair of hip external rotators in THA via posterior approach: a three-dimensional MRI-evident quantitative prospective study

The incidence of hip dislocation after posterior approach primary total hip arthroplasty: comparison of two different posterior repair techniques

Total hip arthroplasty with posterior minimal incision for the treatment of femoral neck fracture in the aged people

Supercapsular percutaneously-assisted total hip (SuperPath) versus mini-incision posterolateral total hip arthroplasty for hip osteoarthritis: a prospective randomized controlled trial

The Incidence of Hip Dislocation and Suture Failure According to Two Different Types of Posterior Soft Tissue Repair Techniques in Total Hip Arthroplasty: a Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial: Several Questions

[Safety and Efficacy of Total Hip Arthroplasty Following Failed Internal Fixation of Intertrochanteric Fractures].

[Optimization of Capsulotomy of Enhanced Posterior Soft Tissue Repair in Total Hip Arthroplasty].

Total Hip Arthroplasty Using the Conjoined Tendon‐Preserving Posterior Approach: The Modified Posterior Approach with a Minimum of 2‐Year Follow‐Up

Application of patch in the total hip arthroplasty to reconstruct soft tissue tension after hip fusion