Investigation of homogeneity and matter distribution on large scales using large quasar groups

minghua li,zhibing li
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/0253-6102/64/6/758
2015-01-01
Communications in Theoretical Physics
Abstract:We use 20 large quasar group (LQG) samples in Park et al. (2015) to investigate the homogeneity of the 0.3 less than or similar to z less than or similar to 1.6 Universe (z denotes the redshift). For comparison, we also employ the 12 LQGs samples at 0.5 less than or similar to z less than or similar to 2 in Komberg et al. (1996) to do the analysis. We calculate the bias factor b and the two -point correlation function SLUG for such groups for three different density profiles of the LQG dark matter halos, i.e. the isothermal profile, the Navarro Frenk White (NFW) profile, and the (gravitational) lensing profile. We consider the ACDM (cold dark matter plus a cosmological constant A) underlying matter power spectrum with Omega(m), = 0.28, Omega(A) = 0.72, the Hubble constant H-0 = 100 h.km.s(-1). Mpc(-1) with h = 0.72. Dividing the samples into three redshift bins, we find that the LQGs with higher redshift are more biased and correlated than those with lower redshift. The homogeneity scale R-H of the LQG distribution is also deduced from theory. It is defined as the comoving radius of the sphere inside which the number of LQGs N(< r) is proportional to r(3) within 1%, or equivalently above which the correlation dimension of the sample D2 is within 1% of D-2 = 3. For Park et al.'s samples and the NFW dark matter halo profile, the homogeneity scales of the LQG distribution are R-H similar or equal to 247 h(-1). Mpc for 0.2 < z < 0.6, RH similar or equal to 360 h(-1). Mpc for 0.6 < z < 1.2, and R-H similar or equal to 480 h(-1). Mpc for 1.2 < z less than or similar to 1.6. The maximum extent of the LQG samples are beyond RH in each bin, showing that the LQG samples are not homogeneously distributed on such a scale, i.e. a length range of similar to 500 h(-1). Mpc and a mass scale of similar to 10(14) M-circle dot. The possibilities of a top-down structure formation process as was predicted by the hot/warm dark matter (WDM) scenarios and the redshift evolution of bias factor b and correlation amplitude xi(LQG) of the LQGs as a consequence of the cosmic expansion are both discussed. Different results were obtained based on the LQG sample in Komberg et al. (1996) and the possible reasons for such differences were discussed.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?