The Newfoundland Offshore Burn Experiment

Mervin F. Fingas,Greg Halley,Francine Ackerman,Robert Nelson,Martine Bissonnette,Nanci Laroche,Zhendi Wang,Patrick Lambert,Ken Li,Paula Jokuty,Gary Sergy,Edward J. Tennyson,Joe Mullin,Larry Hannon,Wayne Halley,John Latour,Roy Galarneau,Bill Ryan,Rod Turpin,Phil Campagna,Don V. Aurand,Robert R. Hiltabrand

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429506376-5

1995-01-01

International Oil Spill Conference Proceedings

Abstract:ABSTRACT A group of 25 agencies from Canada and the United States conducted a major offshore burn experiment near Newfoundland, Canada. Two lots of oil, about 50 cubic meters (50 tons) each, were released into a fireproof boom. Each burn lasted over an hour and was monitored for emissions and physical parameters. Over 200 sensors or samplers were employed to yield data on over 2000 parameters or substances. The operation was extensive; more than 20 vessels, 7 aircraft and 230 people were involved in the operation at sea. The quantitative analytical data show that the emissions from this in-situ oil fire were less than expected. All compounds and parameters measured more than about 150 meters from the fire were below occupational health exposure levels; very little was detected beyond 500 meters. Pollutants were found to be at lower values in the Newfoundland offshore burn than they were in previous pan tests. Polyaromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) were found to be lower in the soot than in the starting oil and were consumed by the fire to a large degree. Particulates in the air were measured by several means and found to be of concern only up to 150 meters downwind at sea level. Combustion gases including carbon dioxide, sulphur dioxide, and carbon monoxide did not reach levels of concern. Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) were abundant, however their concentrations were less than emitted from the nonburning spill. Over 50 compounds were quantified, several at levels of concern up to 150 meters downwind. Water under the burns was analyzed; no compounds of concern could be found at the detection level of the methods employed. Toxicity tests performed on this water did not show any adverse effect. The burn residue was analyzed for the same compounds as the air samples. Overall, indications from these burn trials are that 150 meters or farther from the burn source emissions from in-situ burning are lower than health criteria levels.