Resurfacing of Damaged Articular Cartilage Surfaces Using Arthroscopic Airbrushing
J. Hendriks,C. Visser,K. Dijkstra,L. Vonk,D. Saris,C. Sun,D. Lohse,M. Karperien
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2016.01.849
IF: 7.507
2016-01-01
Osteoarthritis and Cartilage
Abstract:Purpose: There is large unmet need for regenerative treatment of eroded articular cartilage surfaces in end stage osteoarthritis. Arthroscopic airbrushing of chondrocytes or mesenchymal stromal cells (mcs) in an appropriate biomaterial is a promising approach to resurface the joint surface. Recently we have provided proof of concept that arthroscopic airbrushing can be used to fill up focal chondral defects with fibrin glue mixed with chondrocytes and mcss. However, while high-viability results have been reported, occasional cell death hampers widespread introduction of this method. In particular, the influence of the cell type, the biomaterial, airbrushing parameters, and the surface properties on cell viability is still poorly understood, and therefore this problem cannot yet be solved. Thus, the development of a treatment using airbrushing could strongly benefit from a clear understanding of the influence of the process parameters on cell survival, which is the aim of the current work. Methods: Here we present experimental results and a basic theoretical model describing the cell viability as a function of the cell-surrounding droplet, and impact surface characteristics. The model connects (1) the cell survival as a function of the membrane elongation, (2) the membrane elongation as a function of the cell-containing droplet size, velocity, and viscosity, and (3) the substrate properties (stiffness). The model input parameters are experimentally quantified, using ultra-high-speed, high-resolution photography of airbrush droplet populations at a range of spraying conditions. The model is validated by cell-viability measurements. In these experiments, the droplet size, impact velocity, viscosity, nozzle-substrate distance and substrate stiffness were varied. Results: Improved cell survival is observed by reducing the surrounding liquid’s viscosity, reducing the droplet impact velocity, increasing the droplet size and increasing nozzle-substrate distance. Impact on soft tissues dampens cell deformation during impact, also improving cell viability. The analytical cell survival model is validated by these results, which supports the herein proposed mechanisms for cell deformation and subsequent cell survival or death. Conclusions: In conclusion, we physically model cell deformation during droplet impact and show how cell deposition parameters can be adapted to increase cell viability. This approach allows for rational optimization of arthroscopic airbrush devices by controlling the droplet characteristics and surface properties. In particular, we expect that airbrush devices with a monodisperse droplet size (instead of the usually employed polydisperse droplet size distribution) will result in improved cell viability in (clinical) applications. We are currently working on such solutions in which droplets of specific size and velocity are created. With this set-up we can look at further optimizations for airbrushing combinations of cells and biomaterials. We will demonstrate recent preliminary results, which already show improved control of cell deformation and viability.