Income inequality and growth in transition economies : are nonlinear models needed?

Guang Hua Wan

2002-01-01

Abstract:This paper analyses the relationship between income inequality and growth in transition economies. The distinct and complex dynamics adherent to these economies lead to the proposition of new econometric models in the paper. However, empirical results do

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Income Inequality and Growth in Transition Economies

Guang Hua Wan

2002-01-01

Abstract:This paper analyses the relationship between income inequality and growth in transition economies. The distinct and complex dynamics adherent to these economies lead to the proposition of new econometric models in the paper. However, empirical results do not support the proposed more flexible nonlinear functions. Further, the Kuznets hypothesis is clearly rejected by our data. On the contrary, a (first) half U pattern is found to be adequate for describing the inequality-growth relationship. Consequently, the rising inequality commonly observed in transition economies does not constitute part of the empirical regularity found by Robert Barro and others.
China's Unbalanced Economic Growth and National Income Distribution

ZHOU Ming-hai,XIAO Wen,YAO Xian-guo

DOI: https://doi.org/10.19581/j.cnki.ciejournal.2010.06.004

2010-01-01

Abstract:This paper re-measures the labor income share since the reform and opening up,and we find that the labor income share decreases steadily after 1998.The paper also further divides labor into raw labor and human capital.By using the individual level data of UHS,we find the human capital income share has increased rapidly while the raw labor income share decreases steadily during 1988—2007.By using extended MRW growth framework,we find that the movement of China’s national income distribution pattern is closely related to the unbalanced growth feature of factors.The high growth rate of physical and human capital brings upward trend of their factor income share,while the stagnant state of raw labor will bring its share to decrease rapidly.By using various sources of factor growth data from 1995—2007,we confirm the inference of the extended model.And we find that the steady growth of physical capital,the slowing down of the growth rate of human capital,and the negative growth rate of raw labor are the causes of decreasing labor income share.Relate raw labor with minimum wage,we suggest that the unmatched economic contribution and return of rural surplus labor is the key to understand the leaning of national income distribution towards capital.
Human Capital, Population Change and Economic Growth

GE Xiao-han,CHEN Ling

2010-01-01

Abstract:On the basis of Lucas model,this paper constructs a model consisting of human capital,population change and economic growth.Then,we use the panel data of 30 provinces,12 eastern provinces,9 middle provinces,and 9 western provinces respectively during 1997~2004 to test the theoretical model applying fixed-effect model,and find that there is a significant positive correlation between human capital or trade opening degree and economic growth,but the correlation between population growth or FDI and economic growth is ambiguous.In a sense,these results can explain the gap in regional development.In addition,the result of the model doesn't approve the standpoint that we should firstly relax the Family Planning policy in the eastern regions.
Emergence of income inequality: Origin, distribution and possible policies

Songtao Tian,Zhirong Liu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2019.122767

2020-01-01

Abstract:Wealth and income inequality has attracted intensive interest in recent years due to its great significance both in reality and theory. Inspection on individual behaviors in a microscopic view would be useful in clarifying possible reasons for inequality and proper policies for reducing inequality and poverty. This paper presents an inhomogeneous agent-based model to explore the emergence of income inequality, in which individuals with varied qualities work, consume and invest. In despite of the small attribute difference for individuals, large income/wealth inequality and class differentiation naturally occur through a mechanism of capital (investment) income, which shares some analogy to the endogenous growth. The obtained income distribution is well described with an exponential law at smaller values and a power law at large values. Education, which is modeled as increasing the average productivity and decreasing the productivity width, is able to improve the equality and lower the Gini coefficient. The uplift of salary level hampers the speed of investment (industrialization) and the short-term income, but it brings long-term benefits of higher efficiency and equality. These results support the potential capacity of the model as a basic and open framework to investigate multifarious questions regarding income inequality. (C) 2019 Published by Elsevier B.V.
Will China's Demographic Transition Exacerbate Its Income Inequality?–cge Modeling with Top-Down Microsimulation

Xinxin Wang,Kevin Z. Chen,Sherman Robinson,Zuhui Huang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13547860.2016.1263043

2017-01-01

Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy

Abstract:Demographic transition due to population aging is an emerging trend throughout the developing world, and it is especially acute in China, which has undergone demographic transition more rapidly than have most industrial economies. This paper quantifies the distributional effects in the context of demographic transition using an integrated recursive dynamic computable general equilibrium model with top-down behavioral microsimulation. The results of the poverty and inequality index indicate that population aging has a negative impact on the reduction of poverty while its impact is positive with regard to equality. In addition, elderly rural households are experiencing the most serious poverty, and their inequality problems compared with other household groups and within-group inequality worsen with demographic transition. These findings not only advance the previous literature but also deserve particular attention from Chinese policy-makers.
The Inequality–growth Nexus in the Short and Long Run: Empirical Evidence from China

Guanghua Wan,Ming Lu,Zhao Chen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2006.08.004

2008-01-01

Abstract:This paper argues that the conventional approach of data averaging is problematic for exploring the growth-inequality nexus. It introduces the polynomial inverse lag (PIL) framework so that the impacts of inequality on investment, education. and ultimately on growth can be measured at precisely defined time lags. Combining PIL with simultaneous systems of equations, we analyze the growth-inequality relationship in postreform China, finding that this relationship is nonlinear and is negative irrespective of time horizons.
Top-end inequality and growth: empirical exploration of nonlinearities and the time dimension

Elina Tuominen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10888-023-09604-7

2024-03-14

The Journal of Economic Inequality

Abstract:Using the series of the top 1% income shares in 137 countries, I examine the relationship between top-end inequality and subsequent economic growth from the 1920s to the 2010s. These data enable a versatile exploration of various time horizons. To address concerns regarding chosen functional forms, I employ penalized spline methods to accommodate potential nonlinearities. Empirical findings suggest that the relationship between top-end inequality and subsequent growth is complex, contingent upon both the investigated time horizon and the level of economic development. I find some evidence for a positive link at medium levels of economic development, with this positive link being more pronounced in short- to medium-term associations. I also find that the positive medium-run association weakens as economic development advances. In advanced economies, a negative (or nonpositive) medium- to long-term relationship emerges between the top 1% income share and growth in many settings. Furthermore, I conclude that longer-run associations need to be investigated further.

economics
The Inequality-Growth Nexus in the Short and Long Runs

Guanghua Wan,Ming Lü,Zhao Chen

2006-01-01

Abstract:This paper argues that the conventional approach of data averaging is problematic for exploring the growth–inequality nexus. It introduces the polynomial inverse lag (PIL) framework so that the impacts of inequality on investment, education, and ultimately on growth can be measured at precisely defined time lags. Combining PIL with simultaneous systems of equations, we analyze the growth–inequality relationship in postreform China, finding that this relationship is nonlinear and is negative irrespective of time horizons.
The Inversed-U Effect of Income Inequality on Long-term Economic Growth:From Theoretical and Empirical Perspectives

Shenglong Liu

2009-01-01

Abstract:The paper is committed to explore the inverted-U effects of income inequality on long-run economic growth from the theoretical and empirical perspectives.Firstly,based on a Ramsey model,the paper proves that the inverted-U relationship does exist from the theoretical perspective.Secondly,it constructs an empirical model and collects cross-sectional data to test the inverted-U relationship by using OLS and GMM methods.The results show that GMM method is superior to the OLS method.With the other conditions remaining unchanged,the income inequality has a reasonable range and this value is from 0.37 to 0.40 if the inequality degree is measured by GINI coefficient.If the level of income inequality is lower than the optimal value,economic growth can be improved by enlarging income inequality;otherwise,it should shorten income inequality to quicken economic growth.
The Economic Growth Mode in Transition and Urban-Rural Inequality:China's Experience

Zhang Jianhui,Jin Tao

DOI: https://doi.org/10.19862/j.cnki.xsyk.2011.07.013

2011-01-01

Abstract:In China's economic transformation,urban-rural inequality has become a seurious challenge to China's economic development.Based on the provincial panel data during 1978-2008,this article suggests that the hypothesis of Kuznets curver really exists in China,but the curve is flat.Meanwhile,the study presents that the transformation in china expands the urban-rural income gap.Specifically,adjustment of the ownership structure is conducive to narrowing the income gap between urban and rural areas.But the process of market,opening up and local government behavior expand the urban-rural income gap in varying degrees.In particular,the local government behavior appears to be very prominent in a number of factors which expand the urban-rural income gap.The results clearly show that there is a relationship between China's widening of urban-rural income gap and economic growth mode in transformation.
Economic Growth and Income Inequality: The Challenge in Ex-Communist EU Countries

Teodora-Mădălina Pop

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00128775.2024.2370350

2024-06-27

Eastern European Economics

Abstract:This paper explores the relationship between economic growth and income inequality by observing a set of 11 Central and Eastern European (CEE) countries during the period 1994 to 2020. We employ panel cointegration techniques in order to capture the common long-term dynamics of the CEE countries while not imposing equality on the short-run coefficients. Generally, it is found that there exists a monotonically decreasing growth-inequality link, contradicting Kuznets' theory for emerging economies. However, in the short-run, several heterogeneities are found at the cross-country level, implying a diffuse pattern of this association, including an inverted-U-shaped relationship or a linear but insignificant relationship.

economics
How does income inequality affects economic growth at different income levels?

Chengfang Shen,Xindong Zhao

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2022.2080742

2022-06-26

Abstract:To address the slowdown in growth from an inequality perspective, this study applies a comprehensive dataset with strong comparability and a dynamic panel threshold model to explore the effect of income inequality on economic growth, its channels of influence, and differences in channels due to country differences, considering income level differences and country differences. The study finds that whilst inequality impedes growth in the general growth framework, this impediment becomes insignificant when the fertility rate or country differences are controlled for. Second, the impeding effect of inequality on growth occurs at low-income levels rather than at high-income levels. Finally, in the low-income stage, inequality tends to impede growth through channels that reduce the level of human capital and political stability and increase fertility, rather than through channels that affect investment, and the channels vary slightly by the country's economic systems, religious beliefs, and saving habits. This study suggests that at the low-income stage, the government should appropriately increase the proportion of labour compensation, improve the redistribution system, encourage the development of charity, and establish a sound social donation system.
Is the Relationship Between Aid and Economic Growth Nonlinear?

Andros Kourtellos,Chih Ming Tan,Xiaobo Zhang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmacro.2007.02.007

IF: 1.556

2007-01-01

Journal of Macroeconomics

Abstract:In this paper, we investigate the relationship between foreign aid and growth using recently developed sample splitting methods that allow us to simultaneously uncover evidence for the existence of heterogeneity and nonlinearity. We also address model uncertainty in the context of these methods. We find some evidence that aid may have heterogeneous effects on growth across two growth regimes defined by ethnolinguistic fractionalization. However, when we account for model uncertainty, we find no evidence to suggest that the relationship between aid and growth is nonlinear. In fact, our results suggest that the partial effect of aid on growth is likely to be weakly negative. In this sense, our findings suggest that aid is potentially counterproductive to growth with outcomes not meeting the expectations of donors.
Income Inequality and Economic Growth—the Kuznets Curve Revisited

Yin Heng,Gong Liutang,Zou Heng-fu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11459-006-0004-7

2006-01-01

Frontiers of Economics in China

Abstract:In a neoclassical growth framework with a typical political-economy mechanism, this paper reexamines the relationship between the income inequality and economic growth by introducing government spending into the production function and the utility function. It demonstrates that Kuznets’ famous inverted-U shape relationship between inequality and economic growth will hold—the growth rate will be first increasing with the income inequality before the growth rate decreases with inequality.
Does Income Inequality Matter for Structural Transformation?

Deming Luo,Kai Qu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2022.2118220

2022-01-01

Applied Economics Letters

Abstract:This study revisits the effect of income inequality on economic development from the perspective of structural change. Using an international panel dataset of 90 economies from 1996 to 2015, we empirically assess the impact of income inequality on labour transformation across sectors. We use the 'wheat - sugar ratio' as an instrument for endogenous variation. The results suggest that income inequality positively and significantly impacts agricultural labour.
The Growth Model and Economic Equality——a Comparison between South Jiangsu and Wenzhou

Zhang Jianjun

DOI: https://doi.org/10.19744/j.cnki.11-1235/f.2006.08.005

2006-01-01

Abstract:By the study of two representative regional economic growth model constructed in China's transitional economy,the model of South Jiangsu and the model of Wenzhou,in this article,we have explored in China's economic growth the respective effect of the government and the market(entrepreneurs)on economic equality and division of social strata.According to the conclusion made by traditional wisdom and people's intuition,the market has a natural tendency to generate inequality,and the state(the government)has the ability and attempt to make redistribution and level off inequality.But quite different from the conclusion mentioned above is our conclusion made in our study,the conclusion that the government-led growth model(the model of South Jiangsu)has resulted in more inequality and polarized people's income and social structure,while the enterpriser-led growth model(the model of Wenzhou)has led,unexpectedly,to relative equality.The basic cause of the above-mentioned different outcome is the difference in social structure in the key period of economic growth.The conclusion drawn in our study is of great significance in practice to establishing equality as possible as we can and to building up a harmonious society as well as to seeking economic growth.
Income Inequality and Economic Growth in China in the Last Three Decades

Shi Li

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00358533.2016.1246858

2016-01-01

The Round Table

Abstract:This article discusses the close relationship between high growth and rising inequality in China over a period of three decades since the 1980s. By tracing three key components of income inequality over time, i.e. rural, urban and the rural–urban issues, the study presents an overview of the changes that have occurred in processes of inequality in this country. This study also constructs a relationship between income inequality and growth using an econometric model in order to test the Kuznets Hypothesis that posits an inverted U relationship between income per capita and inequality. The article finds no evidence to support the Kuznets Hypothesis; it, instead, offers a multidimensional mode of analysis to explain why income inequality has increased in China over the past three decades.
An integrated panel data approach to modelling economic growth

Guohua Feng,Jiti Gao,Bin Peng

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2020.09.009

IF: 3.363

2022-06-01

Journal of Econometrics

Abstract:<p>Empirical growth analysis is plagued with three problems – variable selection, parameter heterogeneity and cross-sectional dependence – which are addressed independently from each other in most studies. This study is to propose an integrated framework that allows for parameter heterogeneity and cross-sectional error dependence, while simultaneously performing variable selection. We derive the asymptotic properties of the estimator, and apply the framework to a dataset of 89 countries over the period from 1960 to 2014. Our results support the "optimistic" conclusion of Sala-I-Martin (1997), and also reveal some cross-country patterns not found previously.</p>

economics,social sciences, mathematical methods,mathematics, interdisciplinary applications
Unveiling the Relationship Between Economic Growth and Equality for Developing Countries

Tsun Se Cheong,Guanghua Wan,David Kam Hung Chui

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cwe.12435

IF: 2.451

2022-01-01

China & World Economy

Abstract:This study investigates the relationship between economic growth and inequality by employing the artificial neural network approach.There are many important findings.First,this work reveals the underlying functional form of economic growth and inequality by using three-dimensional diagrams.Second,the findings show that there was an inverted-U relationship between economic growth and inequality.This explains apparent contradictions in research findings in the literature.Third,the optimal level of inequality,which corresponds to the highest level of economic growth,is computed for different economies.Our findings were confirmed by the development processes in many developing countries and also in China in recent years,thereby highlighting the importance of inequality alleviation in promoting further economic growth.These findings enable us to derive pragmatic policy implications for other developing countries at different stages of economic development in achieving sustainable growth with equity.
The Impact of Growth and Inequality on Rural Poverty in China

Wan Guanghua,Zhang Yin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2006.08.008

IF: 2.429

2006-01-01

Journal of Comparative Economics

Abstract:This paper analyzes the evolution of poverty in China from the late 1980s to the late 1990s, employing a version of Shapley decomposition tailored to unit-record household survey data. The changes in poverty trends are attributed to two proximate causes—income growth and shifts in income distribution. Different data sets, poverty lines, poverty measures, and equivalence scales are used to examine the robustness of the results. Potential biases arising from ignoring differential regional prices and inflation are also investigated. Notwithstanding some ambiguities in the results, it is consistently found that rural poverty increased in the second half of the 1990s and adverse distributional changes are the main cause. Journal of Comparative Economics 34 (4) (2006) 694–712.

Income inequality and growth in transition economies : are nonlinear models needed?

Income Inequality and Growth in Transition Economies

China's Unbalanced Economic Growth and National Income Distribution

Human Capital, Population Change and Economic Growth

Emergence of income inequality: Origin, distribution and possible policies

Will China's Demographic Transition Exacerbate Its Income Inequality?–cge Modeling with Top-Down Microsimulation

The Inequality–growth Nexus in the Short and Long Run: Empirical Evidence from China

Top-end inequality and growth: empirical exploration of nonlinearities and the time dimension

The Inequality-Growth Nexus in the Short and Long Runs

The Inversed-U Effect of Income Inequality on Long-term Economic Growth:From Theoretical and Empirical Perspectives

The Economic Growth Mode in Transition and Urban-Rural Inequality:China's Experience

Economic Growth and Income Inequality: The Challenge in Ex-Communist EU Countries

How does income inequality affects economic growth at different income levels?

Is the Relationship Between Aid and Economic Growth Nonlinear?

Income Inequality and Economic Growth—the Kuznets Curve Revisited

Does Income Inequality Matter for Structural Transformation?

The Growth Model and Economic Equality——a Comparison between South Jiangsu and Wenzhou

Income Inequality and Economic Growth in China in the Last Three Decades

An integrated panel data approach to modelling economic growth

Unveiling the Relationship Between Economic Growth and Equality for Developing Countries

The Impact of Growth and Inequality on Rural Poverty in China