Telomere Length-Associated Genetic Variants Predict Recurrence Risk in Non-Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Patients
Shigē Péng,Mark Zafereo,Hongliang Liu,Peng Wei,Jia Wu,Jun Gu,Andrew G. Sikora,Qingyi Wei,Guibin Zheng,Sanjay Shete,Jisheng Liu,Guojun Li
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4496143
2023-01-01
Abstract:Background: Lymphocyte telomere length (LTL) is associated with tumor prognosis, and TL-related single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) may affect the recurrence of non-oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (SCCNOP).Methods: A total of 1403 SCCNOP patients were recruited and genotyped for 16 TL-related SNPs identified by a genome-wide association study. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to evaluate associations between the SNPs and SCCNOP recurrence.Findings: Patients carrying the rs755017 GA/GG, rs248799 TC/TT, rs2736108 TC/TT, or rs6772228 AT/AA genotypes exhibited shorter DFS than those with the rs755017 AA, rs248799 CC, rs2736108 CC, or s6772228 TT genotypes, respectively (all log-rank P < 0.05). Multivariable analysis confirmed these associations, indicating an increased risk of recurrence for patients carrying the rs755017 GA/GG, rs248799 TC/TT, rs2736108 TC/TT, or rs6772228 AT/AA genotypes (aHR 1.66, 95% CI 1.32-2.07; aHR 1.77, 95% CI 1.41-2.23; aHR 1.56, 95% CI 1.22-1.99; aHR 1.52, 95% CI 1.20-1.93, respectively). Further stratifying the analysis by smoking status and treatment modality revealed stronger associations between these genotypes and recurrence risk in ever-smokers and patients undergoing combined treatment, but no significant associations in never-smokers or patients undergoing surgery alone.Interpretation: These findings suggest that TL-related SNPs are potential genetic markers of recurrence risk in SCCNOP patients, particularly when analyzed in the context of smoking status and treatment approach. The study highlights the importance of personalized treatment decisions based on genetic factors. Larger studies are needed to validate these findings and elucidate the underlying molecular mechanisms.Funding: Not applicable.Declaration of Interest: Not applicable.Ethical Approval: All participants were required to provide written informed consent. The research protocol and procedures were subjected to rigorous ethical review and received approval from the Institutional Review Board at MD Anderson Cancer Centre. The study adhered to the established guidelines and regulations outlined by the board to ensure the protection of participants' rights and welfare. The study protocol was assigned the reference number LAB00-062, which served as a unique identifier for the research project. By following these ethical and regulatory guidelines, the study aimed to uphold the principles of integrity, privacy, and respect for the participants throughout the research process.