Chemotaxonomy Seen From A Phylogenetic Perspective And Evolution Of Secondary Metabolism

Michael Wink,Flavia Botschen,Christina Gosmann,Holger Schaefer,Peter G. Waterman
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444320503.ch7
2010-01-01
Abstract:All plants produce secondary metabolites (SM); however, the structural types are often specific and restricted to taxonomically related plant groups. This observation was the base for the development of 'chemotaxonomy'. A closer look indicates that a number of SM have a taxonomically restricted distribution. Very often, we also find the same SM in other plant groups which are not related in a phylogenetic context. Examples are given for several groups of alkaloids (including pyrrolizidine and quinolizidine alkaloids) and for cardiac glycosides. How to explain the patchy distribution? Theoretically, the occurrence of SM in unrelated taxa may be due to convergent evolution. Alternatively, the genes encoding the enzymes of secondary metabolism might be widely distributed in the plant kingdom, but switched on or off in a certain context. The analysis of nucleotide and amino acid sequences, which were generated in numerous genome projects during the past decades, provides evidence that most of the genes which encode key enzymes of SM formation have indeed a wide distribution in the plant kingdom. Examples discussed are tryptophan decarboxylase, tyrosine decarboxylase, phenylalanine ammonia-lyase, chalcone synthase, strictosidine synthase, berberine bridge enzyme and codeine reductase. It is speculated that these genes were introduced into the plant genome by horizontal gene transfer, i.e. via bacteria that developed into mitochondria and chloroplasts. Evidence is presented that a patchy distribution can also be due to the presence of endophytic fungi, which are able to produce SM (e.g. ergot alkaloids in Convolvulaceae). The evolution of plant secondary metabolism is a complex process that took place over the past 500 million years.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?