Abstract:Modern aircraft is a man-machine-cooperate complex system. The issues which affect the aviation safety gradually become human factors. Statistical reports show that more than 70% of the civil aircraft accidents are caused by human because of the misuse, abuse and disuse of the automatic systems. Several studies have been made, trying to reveal the reasons of human induced safety issues. Many of them consider workload as a main reason. Studies show that too high or too low of workload would both have higher probability of human errors. The state of art workload measurement techniques are generally organized into three broad categories: subjective rating scales, task performance measures and psychophysiological measures. There are some disadvantages in the conventional workload measuring techniques. Subjective rating scales couldn’t provide continuous evaluation in the flight task and the results could be affected by participants’ emotion and performance etc. The performance measures overlook the operator’s initiatives and effort. The mechanisms of the physiological reactions are complex, and the physiological measures could be easily contaminated by environmental changes such as illumination, pressure and vibration. We proposed a method to evaluate the human factors in a flight task based on multiple objective measures. In the presented method, the objective measures include the pilot’s eye activities, control activities, cardio-respiratory reactions and the flight status parameters. Principal component analysis was applied to integrate the above objective measures into four meaningful aspects. Meanwhile, in order to link the cockpit components (e.g. the displays and the control equipment) to the pilot and the flight performance, four correlation aspects were also considered which include the correlation between the pilot’s cognitive activity and the pilot’s arousal, the correlation between the pilot’s control activity and the pilot’s arousal, the correlation between the pilot’s cognitive activity and the flight performance and the correlation between the pilot’s control activity and the flight performance. These correlation aspects could provide diagnostic information in the assessment of the design of the cockpit components. We also constructed an eight-dimension pattern to integrate the above eight aspects and achieved an intuitive and continuous evaluation of the inflight human factors in the flight deck.

Human-Machine-Cooperation Design Methodology for Civil Aircraft Cockpit

Design and Integration Technology of Communication System of Finish Machining for Aircraft Fuselage-Wing Joints

Multidimensional Cockpit Ergonomics Evaluation System

Smart Cockpit Layout Design Framework Based on Human-Machine Experience

Design And Research Of Human-Computer Interaction Interface In Autopilot System Of Aircrafts

User Centered Design (VII): From Automated Flight Deck to Intelligent Flight Deck

Ergonomics Evaluation Of Cabin Human-Machine Interface Based On Shel Model

A Civil Aircraft Cockpit Control Device Design Using Mixed Reality Device

Usability Evaluation Of The Cockpit Display System

Integrated Usability Evaluation Method for Cockpit of Civil Aircraft

Ergonomic Virtual Assessment for Cockpit Layout of Civil Aircraft

Research on Design Method of Human-in-the-loop Civil Aircraft Simulation System

Ergonomic Assessment for Cockpit Layout of Civil Aircraft Based on Virtual Design

Evolutionary Game and Collaboration Mechanism of Human-Computer Interaction for Future Intelligent Aircraft Cockpit Based on System Dynamics

A hybrid approach based on rough-AHP for evaluation in-flight service quality

Cockpit human thermal-comfort modeling and environ-ment evaluation

Aircraft Cockpit Ergonomic Layout Evaluation Based on Uncertain Linguistic Multiattribute Decision Making

Aircraft cockpit ergonomic layout evaluation method research

Dynamic Function Allocation Method for Aircraft Cockpit Based on Operator Functional State

Procedures in complex systems: the airline cockpit

Layout Design of Human-Machine Interaction Interface of Cabin Based on Cognitive Ergonomics and GA-ACA.