In situ FTIR studies of coadsorption of CN− and CO on Pt(110) electrode surface
li tian,juntao li,李君涛,jinyu ye,chunhua zhen,甄春花,shigang sun,孙世刚
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelechem.2011.04.028
IF: 4.598
2011-01-01
Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry
Abstract:Highlights ► CN − and CO coadsorption on Pt(1 1 0) was studied by in situ FTIR spectroscopy for the first time, and important results were reported. ► It has demonstrated that CN − ad has an inhibition effect for CO ad oxidation, while the anodic stripping of CO ad do not affect on previously adsorbed CN − . ► The results revealed the strong interaction between CN − ad and CO ad at Pt(1 1 0) surface in the coadsorption system. Abstract The coadsorption of CN − and CO on Pt(1 1 0) electrode in acid solutions was investigated by using cyclic voltammetry and in situ FTIR spectroscopy. In comparison with individual adsorption of CO or CN − , the onset oxidation potential of CO (CO ad ) coadsorbed with CN − is positively shifted ca. 100 mV, and its oxidation peak is postponed ca. 260 mV together with a significant decrease in current density. When the coadsorbed CO has been stripped completely, the CV recovers the feature of Pt(1 1 0)/CN − surface, which signifies that the coadsorption of CO does not affect the oxidation behavior of the coadsorbed CN − ( CN ad - ). In comparison of CN − and CO adsorbed alone, the CN ad - band is blue shifted from 2090 to 2108 cm −1 at 0.0 V, and the stark tuning rate is decreased dramatically from 53 to 4 cm −1 V −1 ; while the CO ad band is red shifted from 2075 to 2064 cm −1 at 0.0 V, and the stark tuning rate is slightly decreased from 24 to 19 cm −1 V −1 , The result revealed the strong interaction between CN ad - and CO ad at Pt(1 1 0) surface in the coadsorption system. Keywords Pt(1 1 0) Cyanide Carbon monoxide Coadsorption In situ FTIR spectroscopy 1 Introduction Molecular coadsorption is a common and important interfacial phenomenon in electrocatalytic processes. Studying the effect and nature of the intermolecular interactions involved in the coadsorption is of particularly significance in fundamental of electrocatalysis and other relevant fields, because of its distinct effect on adsorbate structure and reactivity at the metal–solution interface [1] . Much research has been reported on CO and CN − coadsorption system on poly- and single crystal Pt electrode by using cyclic voltammetry and in situ FTIR spectroscopy [2–8] . The significances consist in (1) The structure of CO and CN − is relatively simple, and they are often used to study the interactions involved in coadsorption system and dynamics of the interface as model molecules; (2) CO is a poison/reaction intermediate in electrocatalytic oxidation of organic fuel molecules, and study the relationship between reactivity of adsorbed CO and surface structure of the catalyst provides the opportunity to design new CO tolerant catalyst [9] ; (3) CN − is a important reaction intermediate in many important electrocatalytic reactions, for example, amino acid can be dissociated into CN − adsorbate on Pt, Au and other transition metal surfaces [10,11] . Moreover, CN − is widely applied in pharmaceutical chemistry and chemical industry, such as gold recovery, electroplating. [12] ; (4) both CO and CN − have strong interaction with Pt, are therefore often employed as probe molecules to characterize the surface structure of Pt, surface bonding and local electrostatic environment [13,14] . The single crystal electrodes have a well-defined atomic arrangement. As a consequence, the investigation of coadsorption of CO and CN − on single crystal electrode at a molecular lever is of significance in understanding catalytic mechanism and adsorption process, as well as probing the nature of surface and interface. During the past years, however, most efforts have focused only on the coadsorption of CN − and CO on Pt(1 1 1) surface [2–5] , mainly due to that a stable coadsorption of CN − and CO system could be formed on the Pt(1 1 1) electrode. The studies of coadsorption of CN − and CO on other platinum single crystal planes is quite limited, such as Pt(1 1 0) and Pt(1 0 0), since the coadsorption on such surfaces is relatively complex and unstable. Electrochemical in situ infrared spectroscopy can give information about chemical nature of adsorbates, surface bonding and orientation at molecular level [15] . In current studies, the coadsorption and oxidation of CO and CN − , as well as the individual adsorption of CO or CN − on a Pt(1 1 0) single crystal electrode were investigated by using used cyclic voltammetry and in situ FTIR spectroscopy. New insight has been achieved upon revealing the interaction of coadsorbed CO and CN − on the Pt(1 1 0) electrode. 2 Experimental Pt(1 1 0) single crystal electrode applied in cyclic voltammetry studies is a bead-type about 2 mm in diameter. The Pt(1 1 0) electrode for the in situ FTIR spectroscopy studies is a disk of ca. 10 mm in diameter. Both Pt(1 1 0) single crystal electrodes were treated before each measurement using Clavilier’s methods [16] , i.e. they were annealed in hydrogen–oxygen flame first, and then quenched with ultrapure water (Milli-Q 18.2 MΩ cm) after having been cooled in the air, immersed finally in a 0.1 M NaCN (>95%, A.R., China medical company) solution for approximately 3 min to form a saturated CN − adlayer (dented thereafter Pt(1 1 0)/CN − ). The Pt(1 1 0)/CN − was subsequently rinsed and transferred to the electrochemical cell or spectroelectrochemical IR cell containing cyanide-free 0.1 M H 2 SO 4 solution (GR, Shanghai zhenxing) under protection of a droplet of ultrapure water. CO adsorption on Pt(1 1 0) or on the Pt(1 1 0)/CN − were conducted potentiostatically at −0.1 V by blowing CO gas (99.9%, Linde gas) into the electrochemical cell or spectroelectrochemical IR cell. The CO gas flow was stopped until current flowing dropped to zero. CO dissolved in the solution was then removed by bubbling N 2 (99.999%, Linde gas) for ca. 20 min. Cyclic voltammetry were recorded at a sweep rate of 50 mV s −1 . In situ FTIR spectroscopy experiments were carried out on a Nicolet 8700 research FTIR spectrometer (Thermo Scientific) equipped with a nitrogen cooled MCT-A detector using p-polarized light. The spectroelectrochemical IR cell was assembled with a prismatic CaF 2 IR window beveled at 60°. Each spectrum was consisted of 100 interferograms and collected at 8 cm −1 resolution, which took ca. 1.5 min. The Nicolet 8700 FTIR spectrometer was purged throughout the experiment with clean air free of CO 2 and H 2 O provided by a Whatman 74–5041 clean air package. The multi-potential step FTIR spectroscopy (MSFTIRS) procedure [17] was applied to collect in situ FIIR spectra, which were represented as potential-difference spectra calculated using equation bellow (1) Δ R R = R ( E S ) - R ( E R ) R ( E R ) where R ( E S ) and R ( E R ) are single beam spectra recorded at sample potential E S and reference potential E R , respectively. The potentials were measured against a saturated calomel electrode (SCE), and all experiments were carried out at room temperature. 3 Results and discussion 3.1 CO adsorption Before presenting the coadsorption behaviors of CO and CN − , it is necessary to consider the features of CO and CN − adsorbed individually on Pt(1 1 0) in acid media. While much study has been reported about the former adsorbate [18–23] , we describe here briefly the CV features of CO adsorption on Pt(1 1 0) electrode under the present conditions. As shown in Fig. 1 , a sharp anodic peak appears at 0.408 V in the cyclic voltammogram of Pt(1 1 0) covered with a saturation layer of adsorbed CO (Pt(1 1 0)/CO) in 0.1 M H 2 SO 4 , the oxidation charge is measured at 396 μC cm –2 . In comparison with the hydrogen adsorption charge of 220.5 μC cm –2 measured with Pt(1 1 0) in the same 0.1 M H 2 SO 4 solution, the coverage of a saturation layer of CO on Pt(1 1 0) is estimated ca. 0.90, which is good agreement with previously reported results [18] . The onset potential of CO ad oxidation on Pt(1 1 0) is measured ca . 0.1 V from the insert, i.e. the magnified cyclic voltammogram. In situ FTIR spectra of the Pt(1 1 0)/CO in 0.1 M H 2 SO 4 are displayed in Fig. 2 These spectra were recorded on different potentials which are increasing progressively in anodic polarization direction. In Fig. 2 a the spectrum collected at 0.70 V was used as the reference spectrum, which does not contain IR absorption of CO ad since it has been completely removed by oxidation at this potential. As a result, the IR absorption of CO ad at lower potentials will give a negative single band as predicted by the Eq. 1. However, the reference spectrum in Fig. 2 b was chosen that recorded at −0.25 V, at which no CO 2 produced from CO ad oxidation, resulting in also a negative single band of CO 2 . The downward band at 2060 cm −1 in Fig. 2 a is assigned to linear adsorbed CO, while the band at 2343 cm −1 in Fig. 2 b is attributed to IR absorption of solution CO 2 species. Along with increase of electrode potential in the anodic polarization, the frequency of the CO ad band is blue shifted from 2068 cm −1 at −0.25 V to 2078 cm −1 at 0.15 V, then the CO ad band is red shifted and its intensity decreases, signifying the oxidation of CO ad . We can infer that, from the variation of in situ FTIR spectra in Fig. 2 , the CO ad onset oxidation potential is close to 0.10 V where the CO 2 band appears clearly in the spectrum and its intensity is increased above this potential. Such value is in good agreement with the onset oxidation potential measured from the voltammogram presented in the inset of Fig. 1 . 3.2 CN − adsorption The cyclic voltammograms recorded after CN − adsorption in saturation on Pt(1 1 0) (Pt(1 1 0)/CN − ) under open circuit potential condition are shown in Fig. 3 . The CN − modified electrode was immersed at 0.158 V in the test solution of 0.1 M H 2 SO 4 . On the clean Pt(1 1 0) electrode, current peaks at ca. −0.15 V are attributed to hydrogen adsorption–desorption. This sharp hydrogen adsorption–desorption peak is not disappeared completely on the CN − adsorbed Pt(1 1 0) electrode, which suggests that there are still some CN − free Pt surface sites available for CO adsorption, and no obvious anodic or cathodic peaks are observed at potential above 0.0 V. Moreover, the double layer is become larger after CN − absorbed on Pt(1 1 0), which is also observed on Pt(1 1 1) [24] . The inset to Fig. 3 demonstrates that the hydrogen adsorption–desorption current is gradually increased during electrode potential cycling between −0.25 V and 0.10 V due to the desorption of CN ad - from Pt(1 1 0) surface. In situ FTIR spectra as a function of applied electrode potential recorded in 0.1 M H 2 SO 4 solution for a saturation layer of CN − adsorbed on Pt(1 1 0) are shown in Fig. 4 . The spectrum collected at 0.8 V was set as reference spectrum in Fig. 4 a, since at 0.8 V the CN ad - is almost completely oxidized as evidenced in FTIR spectroscopic study. In order to observe the change of CO 2 band intensity more clearly, the spectrum at 0.0 V is also used as the reference spectrum in Fig. 4 b, where the CN ad - does not oxidize to CO 2 at all. There are two negative bands appeared in the spectra, as reported previously [13,25] . The low-energy band at 2094 cm −1 is assigned to linear adsorbed CN − . The frequency of this CN ad - band is blue shifted from 2094 cm −1 at 0.0 V to 2108 cm −1 at 0.7 V. The high-energy band at 2149 cm −1 is attribute to IR absorption of [Pt(CN) 2 ] 2− complex. The potential dependence is not apparent for the [Pt(CN) 2 ] 2− band. The band at 2343 cm −1 appeared starting from 0.25 V is attributed to CO 2 , which demonstrates that the CN ad - begins to be oxidized into CO 2 at this electrode potential. 3.3 CO/CN − coadsorption Fig. 5 compares the cyclic voltammograms of clean Pt(1 1 0), Pt(1 1 0)/CN − , Pt(1 1 0)/CO, and CN − together with CO coadsorbed on Pt(1 1 0) (Pt(1 1 0)/CO + CN − ) recorded in 0.1 M H 2 SO 4 solution. As stated above, the sharp peaks in the low potential region (−0.25 to 0.20 V) on the clean Pt(1 1 0) are due to hydrogen adsorption–desorption, and the broad anodic peak appearing above 0.5 V together with the cathodic peak at 0.46 V are attributed to oxide formation and reduction on Pt(1 1 0) surface, respectively. It can observe that both hydrogen adsorption–desorption and oxide formation–reduction processes are inhibited on Pt(1 1 0)/CO + CN − surface. In comparison with CO adsorbed alone on Pt(1 1 0), the anodic peak of CO ad oxidation is positively shifted about 260 mV from 0.408 V to 0.67 V together with a significant decrease in peak current density on the Pt(1 1 0)/CO + CN − . This CV result indicates that the CO ad oxidation is inhibited in the CO and CN − coadsorption system. After CO ad striping, the cyclic voltammogram becomes identical to that of the Pt(1 1 0)/CN − . It is evident that the CN ad - has an inhibition effect for CO ad oxidation, while the coadsorption of CO and anodic stripping of CO ad do not affect on previously adsorbed CN − . The possibly reasons for this phenomena may be as follows: (1) The CN ad - species occupy a certain amount of surface sites so that the coverage of CO ad decreases, leading to the decrease of CO ad oxidation current; (2) The oxidation of CO ad needs OH − participation. Since both OH − and CN − are negative charged, it exists a repulsive interaction between them, so the process of OH − adsorption on electrode surface is affected by this repulsive interaction [26] . As a result, the CO ad oxidation is shifted to higher electrode potential region. In situ FTIR spectra of coadsorbed CO and CN − on Pt(1 1 0) are shown in Fig. 6 . The spectra of Fig. 6 a were consecutively recorded by increasing potentials from 0.0 V to 0.70 V, and the spectrum collected at 0.80 V was set as reference. The negative band at 2063 cm −1 , 2113 cm −1 and 2151 cm −1 are assigned to CO ad , CN ad - and [Pt(CN) 2 ] 2− , respectively. It can observe from Fig. 6 b that the CO 2 band begins appearing clearly at 0.2 V. In combining with the result of Fig. 5 , it confirms that the CO 2 species are originated from CO ad oxidation. However, the onset potential of CO ad oxidation in this coadsorption system has been postponed for 100 mV in comparison with the CO ad oxidation in CO adsorption alone on Pt(1 1 0) (see Fig. 2 b). Both cyclic voltammetric and in situ FTIR results demonstrate that the CN ad - plays an inhibition role for CO ad oxidation in coadsorption system. It is interesting that the CV features of CN − in the coadsorption system after CO ad striping remains the same as CN − individually adsorbs on Pt(1 1 0). This is also observed in other coadsorption system such as CO coadsorbed with NO [27] , CN − coadsorption with NO [28] on Pt electrodes . In order to gain insights on the interaction of CO and CN − in their coadsorption on Pt(1 1 0) at a molecule level, the in situ FTIR data reported in Figs. 2, 4 and 6 are further analyzed. Fig. 7 compares the variations of CO and CN − band centers versus E S in different adsorption systems. In the CO and CN − coadsorption system, the CN − band center ( Fig. 7 a) is increased slowly at first with increasing potential from 0.0 to 0.2 V, yielding a small stark tuning rate at 4 cm −1 V −1 , and then decreases progressively with further augmenting electrode potentials. It is evident that, in comparison with CN − adsorption alone on Pt(1 1 0) with a large stark tuning rate of 53 cm −1 V −1 , the stark tuning rate of this band is dramatically decreased, while the CN − band center in the coadsorption system is blue shifted. It is interesting to observe opposite effects upon the CO band. The CO band center in the coadsorption system is red shifted. However, the stark tuning rate in the coadsorption system is measured at 19 cm −1 V −1 , which is slightly decreased in comparison with the value of 24 cm −1 V −1 for the CO adsorption alone on Pt(1 1 0). Moreover, all the phenomena discussed above are also appeared in the case of CN − coadsorption with CO on Pt(1 1 1), and the effect in the stretching frequency of CN ad - appeared in the presence of formic acid and methanol in solution too, even though no CO or other adsorbate could be detected under these conditions [2] . The results in Fig. 7 illustrate clearly a strong interaction between CO and CN − coadsorbed on Pt(1 1 0). According to the boding model of CO and CN − on a Pt surface [29] , it may be interpreted that, in the coadsorption system, the negatively charged CN − induces an increase in the d–π∗ back donation between Pt(1 1 0) and CO ad , leading to a red shift of the CO ad band together with a decrease in Stark tuning rate. However, at the same time, the bond between Pt(1 1 0) and CN ad - is weakened, which increases the strength of the C N bond. As a result, the CN − band is blue shifted and its stark tuning rate is dramatically deceased. 4 Conclusions The interaction of CN − and CO coadsorption on Pt(1 1 0) electrode in acid media was investigated by cyclic voltammetry and in situ FTIR spectroscopy. The study revealed that the coadsorption has a significant effect on the oxidation of CN ad - and CO ad , as well as their interaction on the Pt(1 1 0) surface. The CN ad - band is blue shift, while CO ad band is red shift in the coadsorption system. Moreover, the stark tuning rate of CO ad band is slightly from 24 to 19 cm −1 V −1 ; while the CN-1 band is dramatically decreased from 53 to 4 cm −1 V −1 . After CN ad - and CO ad coadsorbed on Pt(1 1 0), the OH − adsorption on the electrode surface is inhibited because of the repulsive interaction between CN ad - and OH - . As a consequence, the onset oxidation potential of CO ad is positively shifted ca. 100 mV, and the anodic peak potential of CO ad oxidation is postponed about 260 mV with a significant decrease in current density. The cyclic voltammetric studies demonstrated that the anodic stripping of CO ad does not affect the previously adsorbed CN ad - at all. The current investigation is of significance in understanding fundamental of electrocatalysis, since the interactions between coadsorption molecules have a distinct effect on adsorbate structure and reactivity at the metal–solution interface. Acknowledgment This study was financially supported by NSFC (Grants 2083305 and 21021002 ). References [1] C. Tang S.Z. Zou M.W. Severson M.J. Weaver J. Phys. Chem. B 102 1998 8546 8556 [2] A. Cuesta M. Escudero B Lanova H. Baltruschat Langmuir 25 2009 6500 6507 [3] F. Huerta E. Moralllón J.L. Vazquez Electrochem. Commun. 4 2002 251 254 [4] Isabel. Morales-Moreno A. Cuesta Claudio. Gutiérrez J. Electroanal. Chem. 560 2003 135 141 [5] B. Geng S.X. Liu J. Cai S.Z. Liang Y.X. Chen J. Phys. Chem. C 113 2009 10326 10328 [6] A. Cuesta J. Am. Chem. Soc. 128 2006 13332 13333 [7] A.F. Carley P.R. Davies M.W. Roberts A.K. Santra K.K. Thomas Surf. Sci. 406 1998 587 591 [8] K. Yoshimi M-B. Song M. Ito Surf. Sci. 368 1996 389 395 [9] K.J.J. Mayrhofer M. Arenz B.B. Blizanac V. Stamenkovic P.N. Ross N.M. Markovic Electrochim. Acta 50 2005 5144 5154 [10] C.H. Zhen S.G. Sun C.J. Fan S.P. Chen B.W. Mao F.Y. Jun Electrochim. Acta 49 2004 1249 1255 [11] F. Huerta E. Moralllón J.L. Vazquez A. Aldaz J. Electroanal. Chem. 475 1999 38 45 [12] F. Huerta C. Mele B. Bozzini E. Moralllón J. Electroanal. Chem. 569 2004 53 60 [13] F.J. Huerta E. Moralllón J.L. Vazquez A. Aldaz Surf. Sci. 396 1998 400 410 [14] M.J. Weaver Appl. Surf. Sci. 67 1993 147 159 [15] Z.Y. Zhou S.G. Sun Electrochim. Acta 50 2005 5163 5171 [16] J. Clavilier D. Armand S.G. Sun M. Petit J. Electroanal. Chem. 205 1986 267 277 [17] W.F. Lin S.G. Sun Electrochim. Acta 41 1996 803 809 [18] S.C. Chang Lam-Wing H. Leung M.J. Weaver J. Phys. Chem. 93 1989 5341 5345 [19] F.J. Vidal-Iglesias J. Solla-Gullón J.M. Campiña E. Herrero A. Aldaz J.M. Feliu Electrochim. Acta 54 2009 4459 4466 [20] S. Yamagishi T. Fujimoto Y. Inada H. Orita J. Phys. Chem. B 109 2005 8899 8908 [21] J.C. Davies B.E. Hayde D.J. Pegg Surf. Sci. 467 2000 118 130 [22] F. Dederichs K.A. Friedrich W. Daum J. Phys. Chem. B 104 2000 6626 6632 [23] H. Kita H. Naohara T. Nakato S. taguchi A. Aramata J. Electroanal. Chem. 386 1995 197 206 [24] F. Huerta E. Morallón J. Vázquez Surf. Sci. 431 1999 577 581 [25] K.A. Friedrich W. Daum C. Klüker D. Knabben U. Stimming H. Ibach Surf. Sci. 335 1995 315 325 [26] D. Strmcnik M. Escudero-Escribano K. Kodama V.R. Stamenkovic1 A. Cuesta N.M. Markovic Nat. Chem. 2 2010 880 885 [27] C. Tang S.Z. Zhou S.C. Chang M.J. Weaver J. Electroanal. Chem. 467 1999 92 104 [28] A. Cuesta M. Escudero Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 10 2008 3628 3634 [29] D.S. Kellogg J.E. Pemberton J. Phys. Chem. 91 1987 1120 1126