An Address on Neurology and Therapeutics
W. Gowers
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.1.1686.833
1893-04-22
British Medical Journal
Abstract:(Concludedfrom p. 782.) BUT I must ask you to retrace your steps in order to gain a clear conception of the nature of the processes that take place in their relation to treatment. The first step in the process of analysis was that the white columns of the cord were re. solved into their functional constituent tracts-resolved by the distinction effected by process of disease and its consequent decay. But meanwhile another process of analysis was taking place. This process was one of extreme importance and extreme interest. It rested partly upon direct observation and partly on the inductions of theoretical nature founded on those observations; and, strange to say, even the observations have been, to a large extent, lost sight of. They were the researches of the elder Remak, of Max Schultze, corroborated by the scarcely less important investigation of our own Beale. Before then, and, indeed, since then, the axis cylinder of a nerve fibre has been thought of as a unit, as a solid conducting substance, comparable to a conducting wire through which a current of electricity passes; and a bundle of nerves has been thought of as analogous to a submarine electrical cable. But the number of separate units capable of isolated conduction contained in such a structure is wholly incommensurate with the needs-motor or sensoryof the parts to which the nerve goes. So incommensurate, indeed, is the nerve that the ultimate result is not a little remarkable, since it has led one of the latest writers on the subject to deny the possibility of demonstrated facts, because the nerves fail to furnish a sufficient number of separate elements to subserve the separate and distinct functions that cin be observed. The marvellous discrimination of sensation in the skin, the way in which touch, heat, cold, and pain are distinguished in the most minute areas of the integument, is