Abstract:Purpose: This study focuses on the changes in differences in the journal coverage, visibility and prestige of journals from top twenty countries in Web of Science and Scopus in the twenty-year timeframe-2001-2020. Methodology: Using Web of Science and Scopus journal data from Journal Citation Reports and Scimago Journal Rank, respectively, top twenty countries by number of journals indexed in the two databases were identified. Analysis of the changes that occurred in the number of journals from the top twenty countries, the citations they received and their prestige were analyzed. Findings: USA and UK continued their dominance of the journals indexed in Web of Science and Scopus, but their dominance waned gradually in the course of the twenty-year period. The rate of growth of journals indexed by the databases is steeper among the countries outside the top. In Web of Science, journals from the UK were the most prestigious until 2010 when China emerged as the most prestigious journals. USA continues to take the leading spot in terms of most prestigious journals in Scopus, followed by UK. Research Limitations: This investigation relied on third-party datasets sourced from the Scimago Journal Rank repository for the compilation of the Scopus journal list. Practical implications: This study suggests an inclination towards diversity by Web of Science and Scopus, though North America and Europe continue to dominate journal coverage. However, the gulf in the prestige and visibility of journals from North America, Europe and other parts of the world remains, suggesting the researchers from the peripheral may continue to gravitate towards the core. Originality/Value: While studies have provided singular-year analyses of journal coverages of Web of Science and Scopus, this study provides an analysis of 20 years.

The World of Science According to Performance Indicators Based on Percentile Ranking Normalization.

International Performance of Chinese Institutes in Different Disciplines——A Bibliometric View

A discussion of measuring the top-1 percent most-highly cited publications: Quality and impact of Chinese papers

A Discussion of Measuring the Top-1% Most-Highly-Cited Publications: the Case of China

A Discussion of Measuring the Top-1% Most-Highly Cited Publications: Quality and Impact of Chinese Papers.

Is the United States losing ground in science? A global perspective on the world science system

The growth momentum of China in producing international scientific publications seems to have slowed down

2011-2012 multi-indicator analysis of world-class universities and academic institutions

Global Performance and Development on Sustainable City Based on Natural Science and Social Science Research: A Bibliometric Analysis.

Comparison of universities' scientific performance using bibliometric indicators

A Comparative Analysis of Publication Portfolios of Selected Economies.

On the Predictability of Utilizing Rank Percentile to Evaluate Scientific Impact

Growth of Science: How long will the United States uphold its position?

The European Union, China, and the United States in the Top-1% and Top-10% Layers of Most-Frequently-Cited Publications: Competition and Collaborations

How Can Journal Impact Factors Be Normalized Across Fields of Science? an Assessment in Terms of Percentile Ranks and Fractional Counts

Research Performance of Chinese Research Universities:A Scientometric Study

A New Ranking Scheme for the Institutional Scientific Performance

The performance of Asian S&T journals in international citation indicators

Openness and Impact of Leading Scientific Countries

Macro-indicators of Citation Impacts of Six Prolific Countries: InCites Data and the Statistical Significance of Trends.

Variations in Web of Science and Scopus Journal Coverage, Visibility and Prestige between 2001 and 2020