Abstract:The field of self-adaptive software is becoming increasingly crucial because software has to adapt its behavior at runtime to keep up with dynamic and constantly evolving environments. The ability of software to modify and adjust itself is known as adaptability, which has been acknowledged as an important quality attribute. As software architecture development represents the initial stage of the design process, architectural design has emerged as a critical development activity. The degree to which the architecture can adapt to changes will be the key factor in determining the adaptability of the software ultimately released to users. Existing metrics for software architectural adaptability typically view adaptability as a positive attribute, meaning that any possibility of change in architectural elements is perceived as an improvement in adaptability. However, the application of adaptability that leads to increased costs or complexity can only be seen as a negative attribute. In other words, the side effects brought about solely for the purpose of achieving adaptability are greatly overlooked; that is, the impacts caused by adaptability exhibit both symmetry and asymmetry for software architectural adaptability. On the other hand, the existing measures of adaptability only define it from the perspective of whether a module will change, without considering changes beyond the topological structure under multiple strategies. In this paper, we propose a comprehensive assessment approach to measure software architecture adaptability. Multiple factors are considered, including the number and types of strategies employed, the cost of completing the adaptation, the extent of changes made to the architectural elements, and the overall impact of the adaptation on the architecture. An extended UML (e-UML) component diagram is presented to model software architectural changes under various types of strategies. Finally, an experiment on the znn.com software is conducted to validate the practical feasibility of our proposed method. Our approach can assist software architects in making informed decisions regarding software architecture design options to improve the adaptability and longevity of their software systems.

Improvement of Product Adaptability by Efficient Module Interactions

Modular Design of Mechanical Products Based on Module Family

Modular Design Involving Effectiveness of Multiple Phases for Product Life Cycle

An Integrated Method for Flexible Platform Modular Architecture Design

Enhancing Software Architecture Adaptability: A Comprehensive Evaluation Method

An Integrated Modular Design Methodology Based on Maintenance Performance Consideration

Research on Product's Module Partition for Generalized Engineering Change

Some Intelligent Methods in Product Modularization

Assessment of the Design Complexity of Modular Automated Assembly System

Evaluation Method for Evolution Control of Complex Modular Product Family

Research on Key Technologies for Product Axiomatic Design and Configuration Integration

Construction of Product Module Based on Interpretive Structure Modeling and Its Optimization

Two-additive Fuzzy Measure-Based Information Integration Approach to Product Design Alternative Evaluation

An Architecture Of Adaptive Interface And Its Implementation

Product Architecture and Trade-ins for Managing Sequential Innovation

Research on self-adaptive management method of product configuration knowledge

A Product Design Based on Interaction Design and Axiomatic Design Theory

A modular product design framework for the home appliance industry

Service Oriented Product Modular Design Method and Its Prospects

Research on Evaluation Method of Modularization Grade of Products

Functional upgrading fundamental and performance upgrading priority ranking of adaptable-function products