ENERGY AND SECURITY IN NORTHEAST ASIA: PROPOSALS FOR NUCLEAR COOPERATION

Susan L. Shirk,Michael Stankiewicz
1998-01-01
Abstract:In Policy Paper 36, Fesharaki and his colleagues at the East-West Center's Program on Resources, Energy, and Minerals examined supply and demand projections of fossil fuel usage and argued that markets can solve looming energy crises, obviating the need for multilateral solutions. Their analysis of the inefficacy of certain proposals for regional cooperation regimes based on intra-regional pipelines suggests caution about the prospects of current proposals for multilateral cooperation, highlighting the enormous political and social distrust in the region--the basis of Calder's fears about regional tension and rivalry. Policy Papers 35 and 36 contain two common themes. The contributors to both noted the increasing primacy that Asian economies place on nuclear power as a future energy source, especially relative to the dwindling post-Chernobyl and Three Mile Island nuclear programs elsewhere. They also provided evidence supporting Calder's proposal that energy rivalry not only provides potential for major power tension, but also the opportunity for major power cooperation. In this era of cheap oil supplies and even cheaper development technologies, and with all of the governments in Northeast Asia maintaining a primary goal of economic growth and higher standard of living for their constituents, Northeast Asia has a shared priority in guaranteeing safe, stable energy supplies without risking the shortages that historically led to competition and conflict. 1
What problem does this paper attempt to address?