Abstract:In this paper we examine capital income taxation of a reference dependent sufficiently loss averse investor in a two period portfolio choice model under full loss offset provisions. Capital income taxation with loss offset provisions has been found to stimulate risk taking in expected utility models under certain assumptions about attitudes towards risk but would such effect be found under prospect theory type of preferences? We observe that the impact of capital income taxation depends on investors’ reference levels relative to their endowment income and thus we explore capital income taxation for different types of loss averse investors in terms of their ambition. We consider the less ambitious investors to be the ones with relatively low reference levels (they avoid relative losses in both periods) and more ambitious investors to be those with relatively high reference levels. We analyze two types of more ambitious investors: investors with higher time preference (who experience relative losses only in the second period under the bad state of nature) and investors with lower time preference (who experience relative losses only in the first period). We observe that capital income taxation stimulates current consumption in most cases which encourages risk taking, although the final outcome would depend on the investors’ degree of risk aversion, the rate of time preference and the tax rate in relation to certain thresholds. Current consumption could be discouraged for some ambitious type of investors that have relatively high second period reference levels but not necessary first period reference levels. in summary, to determine the impact of capital income taxation on the decision variables the reference levels in relation to endowment income play the most significant role. Ignoring reference depended preferences can lead to different conclusions for investors reaction to capital income taxation. We also find certain type of investors whose happiness level increases with capital income taxation under full loss offset provisions.

Taxing Top Earners: a Human Capital Perspective

Does Taxing Business Owners Affect Employees? Evidence from a Change in the Top Marginal Tax Rate

Optimal taxation of risky entrepreneurial capital

Top Wealth in America: New Estimates and Implications for Taxing the Rich

Supply-side Optimal Capital Taxation with Endogenous Wage Inequality

The Economics of Managerial Taxes and Corporate Risk-Taking

Optimal taxation and the Domar-Musgrave effect

Taxation, Human Capital Accumulation and Economic Growth

Optimal taxation, differential mortality, and endogenous human capital accumulation in China

Optimal Income Taxation: an Urban Economics Perspective

Personal tax exemption amount,tax rate and the Laffer Curve

Redistributive Capital Taxation Revisited

Persistent Heterogeneous Returns and Top End Wealth Inequality

Optimal Income Taxation

Uncovering the Dynamics of the Wealth Distribution

Using the Discrete Model to Derive Optimal Income Tax Rates

Zipf's Law, Pareto's Law, and the Evolution of Top Incomes in the U.S.

A Case Against Zero Capital-Income Taxation

The choice of the personal income tax base

Taxation and the Life Cycle of Firms

Capital Income Taxation under Full loss offset Provisions of a Prospect Theory Investor