Treatment Patterns of Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia Patients with Suboptimal Responses to Imatinib

A. Guerin,A. Guo,D. Williams,A. P. Yu,E. Wu,D. Latremouille-Viau,M. Tsaneva,J. Signorovitch,J. D. Griffin
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2009.27.15_suppl.7090
IF: 45.3
2009-01-01
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Abstract:7090 Background: Imatinib is the first-line therapy for Philadelphia chromosome-positive chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML). Patients with suboptimal responses may have the dose of imatinib escalated or may be switched to an alternative kinase inhibitor such as dasatinib. The aim of this study is to examine the real-world treatment patterns of imatinib and dasatinib in CML patients. Methods: Two large U.S. administrative claims databases from January 1999 to March 2008 were combined (MarketScan and Ingenix Impact) to extract de-identified information of patients diagnosed with CML (ICD-9 code: 205.1) who were initiated on imatinib. Patients were followed from the first observed imatinib prescription to the end of data availability. Patients who increased imatinib dose to >400 mg/day were defined as dose escalators, while patients who initiated on imatinib and further switched to dasatinib were considered as switchers. Rates of imatinib dose escalation and switching to dasatinib were estimated. Kaplan-Meier (KM) survival analyses were used to estimate the rate of imatinib discontinuation, defined as a lack of imatinib supply for at least 90 days. Among switchers, the rate of switching back to imatinib was also estimated using KM survival analysis. Results: Among the 5,159 CML patients initiated with imatinib, 1,144 patients either had dose escalation of imatinib (839) or were switched to dasatinib (305) during the study period. Of the 5,159 patients, 12.1% patients discontinued imatinib by the end of the first year, and 25.4% discontinued by the end of the third year. Among the 305 switchers, 115 (37.7%) had an imatinib dose increase prior to the switch, and 66 (21.6%) were escalated to 800 mg of imatinib before switching. 51 patients (16.7%) had used imatinib for <6 months before switching, and 17.1% switched back to imatinib within 6 months of dasatinib treatment. Conclusions: This study showed that great variability was observed in the real world treatment pattern of CML patients. Most CML patients who initiated on imatinib did not dose increase or switch during the study period. Of those who switched to dasatinib, most did not attempt to increase the dose before switching, and a sizeable portion of patients had to switch back to imatinib. [Table: see text]
What problem does this paper attempt to address?