Abstract:The technique of localising a moving target through multiple independent observation stations has attracted interest in a number of fields. The problem of moving source localisation is discussed based on frequency of arrival (FOA) and angle of arrival (AOA) measurements. The authors present a closed‐form solution and bias reduction method using FOA and AOA measurements. The combination of FOA and AOA has been demonstrated to improve the accuracy of localisation with fewer stations. Theoretical analysis and simulation results indicate that the proposed method can asymptotically approach the CRLB under moderate Gaussian noise. Based on frequency of arrival (FOA) and angle of arrival (AOA) measurements, the localisation of a moving source using a number of stationary stations is discussed. A closed‐form solution and bias reduction method using FOA and AOA measurements will be presented to quickly and accurately estimate target parameters, including location and velocity. The closed‐form solution is implemented using two‐stage weighted least squares, which constructs a pseudolinear equation by introducing auxiliary variables to perform linear estimation. In the process of linearisation, the authors utilise AOA measurements to simplify the FOA pseudolinear equation and reduce the number of auxiliary parameters. This means that fewer stations are needed to estimate the target parameters. However, the use of the computationally attractive pseudolinear formulation will introduce a non‐ignorable localisation bias if the measurements are not sufficiently accurate. To solve the above problem, a quadratic constraint on least squares minimisation is considered in the bias reduction method. Under moderate Gaussian noise, theoretical analysis and simulation results show that the root mean square error of proposed method can significantly reduce positioning deviation and asymptotically approach the Cramer–Rao Lower Bound. Keywords Radar, Radar detection, Doppler shift, Parameter estimation.

Source Localization and Calibration Using TDOA and FDOA Measurements in the Presence of Sensor Location Uncertainty.

A Moving Source Localization Method Using TDOA, FDOA and Doppler Rate Measurements.

Robust Localization Using Time Difference of Arrivals.

An Efficient TDOA and FDOA Based Source Localization Algorithm Via Importance Sampling

Passive Localization Based on Spectral Estimation Methods Using Sources of Opportunity

TDOA and FDOA Based Source Localisation Via Importance Sampling

A Moving Source Localization Method Based on TDOA and TDOA Rate

Closed-Form Method for Unified Far-Field and Near-Field Localization Based on TDOA and FDOA Measurements

Optimal Sensor Placement for TDOA-Based Source Localization with Sensor Location Errors

DOA Estimation and Self-calibration under Unknown Mutual Coupling

Nearly Optimal Sensor Selection for TDOA-Based Source Localization in Wireless Sensor Networks

Research on Acoustic Source Localization Using Time Difference of Arrival Measurements

An asymptotically unbiased 3D source localisation method based on frequencies and angles measurements

Performance Analysis and Sensor-Target Geometry Optimization for TOA and TDOA-Based Hybrid Source Localization Method

On the Accuracy of Passive Source Localization Using Acoustic Sensor Array Networks

Improved Two-Step Constrained Total Least-Squares TDOA Localization Algorithm Based on the Alternating Direction Method of Multipliers

Low-Complexity Hyperbolic Source Localization with A Linear Sensor Array

Robust Time-Difference-of-Arrival (TDOA) Localization Using Weighted Least Squares with Cone Tangent Plane Constraint

On the Performance of Wireless Source-Location Using Tdoa Measurements under Poor Geometry

High-Precision Joint TDOA and FDOA Location System

Acoustic source localization scheme without time synchronization