A Validated Scoring System to Predict Proximal Neoplasia for Colorectal Cancer Screening

Martin C. S. Wong,Jessica Y. L. Ching,Jeffrey P. Shum,Victor C. W. Chan,Thomas Y. T. Lam,Arthur K. C. Luk,Sunny H. Wong,Siew C. Ng,Simon S. M. Ng,Justin C. Y. Wu,Francis K. L. Chan,Joseph J. Y. Sung
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2015.04.072
IF: 13.576
2015-01-01
Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Abstract:Flexible sigmoidoscopy and colonoscopy are two commonly used screening modalities. The choice between the two depends on the risk of proximal neoplasia (PN). This study developed a clinical scoring system to predict the risks of PN. We recruited 5,789 Chinese asymptomatic screening participants who received colonoscopy in Hong Kong (2008-2012). From random sampling of 2,000 participants, the independent risk factors were evaluated for PN using binary regression analysis. The odds ratio for significant risk factors was used to develop a scoring system, with a score range of 0-5 and stratified into “average risk” (AR): 0-2 and “high risk” (HR):3-5. The other 3,789 screening participants formed an independent validation cohort. Each screening participant received a score calculated based on their risk factors. The performance of the scoring system was evaluated. The proportion of PN in the derivation and validation cohorts was 12.6% and 12.9%, respectively. The following predictors of PN were used to assign scores to each subject: age 50-55 years (0), 56-70 (1), male gender (1), female gender (0), family history of CRC in a first-degree relative present (1) or absent (0), BMI<25 kg/m2 (0), BMI ≥25 kg/m2 (1), self-reported IHD (1), no IHD (0). 85.0% and 15.0% in the validation cohort were classified as AR and HR, respectively. The prevalence of PN in the AR and HR groups was 12.0% and 18.1%, respectively. Participants in the HR group had 1.51-fold (95% CI=1.24 to 1.84, P < .001) increased risk of PN compared to the AR group. The overall c-statistics of the prediction model was 0.71 (0.02). The Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit statistic indicated a close match between predicted risk and real risk (P = .381). The scoring system is useful in predicting the risk of PN to prioritize patients for colonoscopy. These findings are more pertinent for Asian populations especially in resource-deprived countries, where colonoscopy may not be available for all screening participants.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?