Abstract:There are three models on the structure of Chinese governance ,all taking account of the central government ’ s objectives about governance efficiency and political stability at the same time .They are the“administrative subcontract system” model by Zhou Li‐An ,the model of“centralized personal controls at the national level , and decentralized ruling over the people regionally” by Cao Zhenghan ,and the“empire’ s governance logic” model by Zhou Xueguang . All three models have significant divergences in terms of whether the two objectives of efficiency and stability of the central government can be compatible or not .Zhou Li‐An and Cao Zhenghan argue that the two objectives are compatible in specific governance structure ,which is not shared by Zhou Xueguang who argues that the co‐existence of centralization and decentralization cannot lead to a stable structure and the two processes are subject to cyclical adjustment and cyclic fluctuation .And also , the analyses of the three models focus on different levels . The “administrative subcontract system”model and the“empire’ s governance logic” model mainly discuss the governance structure and mechanism of the different levels of governments within the bureaucratic system , while the model of “centralized personal controls at the national level , and decentralized ruling over the people regionally” focuses on how the way of central government dealing with the public shapes the basic structure of decentralization . The divergences are caused by two reasons . First , these three models hold different assumptions about whether the rule over the military and the people can be separated . Second ,there exists the disagreement about which one is the critical source of political risks between decentralization itself (e .g . the local governments’ behaviors as deviation ,out of control ,etc .) and the public (e .g .the public’s behaviors as protest ,opposition ,confrontation ,etc .) .

Relationship, Structure and Interests Expression--Network Models in Policy-making and Governing

Political Risks and Decentralization:The Comparison of Three Models on Chinese Governance

Policy Network as a Governance Tool An Analytical Framework

A Research on the Network Model of the Implementation of Education Policy

Internal Contract and Explicit Contract: Rethinking of Social Contract Mode

Economic Analysis on the Structure of Interests of Central and Local Government

An Analysis on Logic and Model of Public Policy Design

The Structure of Social Network Research:The Organizational Theory and Management Research as Examples

The Function of International Pattern and Its Influence on the Preference for Policy

Political Perspectives on Inter‐organizational Networks

The Internal Logic Between the Network of Public Opinion and the Government Decision-making Generated

The Building and Governance of Government Social Network Relationships

Policy Networks in Complex Governance Subsystems: Observing and Comparing Hyperlink, Media, and Partnership Networks

Synergetic Innovation in Social Governance in a Complex Network Structural Paradigm

Research on the Governance Structure of Little Science Based on Network of Employment Relationship: Policy Implications for China

Research on Organizations’ Network Forms:Reviews and Prospects

Social Relations Network and Political Behavior——Briefly Analyzing Western Views on Political Network

Research on the Central-Local Governments Relations in the Policy Process of Social Housing——Analyzing and Application of Policy Network Theory

Ontological Foundation of Policy Network：A Case Study to the Diffusion of 'Innovation Ecosystem' Discourse in the US Congress

Realization Path of Good Governance Structure from the Perspective of Governance Interdependence

Organizing and Evaluating Interfirm Networks: a Structurationist Perspective on Network Processes and Effectiveness