Sexual Dimorphism and Fecundity in the Gold-Stripe Pond Frog (pelophylax Plancyi) and the Terrestrial Frog (fejervarya Limnocharis)
SHOU Lu,DU Wei-guo,Shu Lin
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:1000-0933.2005.04.002
2005-01-01
Acta Ecologica Sinica
Abstract:The fecundity selection” hypothesis has been used to explain why females grow larger than males in many animal species. To test whether this hypothesis is able to explain inter-specific differences in sexual dimorphism, we compared sexual dimorphism and female fecundity of two species of frogs, the gold-stripe pond frog (Pelophylax plancyi) and the terrestrial frog (Fejervarya limnocharis), in eastern China. In May 2002, 93 terrestrial frogs (51 males, 42 females) and 104 gold-stripe pond frogs (28 males, 76 females) were captured from Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province. The animals were weighed to the nearest mg and measured to the nearest mm for snout-urostyle length, head length and width, diameter of eye, and limb length. Clutch sizes were also determined by counting eggs inside the females. The snout-urostyle length of adult females was significantly larger than that of adult males in both species. Although the degree of sexual size dimorphism differed remarkably (0.30 in P. plancyi and 0.08 in F. limnocharis), clutch size was similar between the two species after the effects of female body size (snout-urostyle length) were statistically removed. Therefore, our results are not consistent with the fecundity selection hypothesis. This outcome may not necessarily mean that fecundity selection does not affect the evolution in sexual dimorphism in amphibian. Firstly, a comparison between two species is not enough to draw general conclusions. Secondly, other causes, which we were not able to test in the current study, could be responsible to failure of the fecundity selection hypothesis to predict the sexual dimorphism in these two species. These causes include selection pressures that affect males rather than females, interspecific differences in energy allocation or mortality rates, and the unknown phylogenetic history of the two species. Moreover, we found interspecific and between-sex differences in body condition and morphology in P. plancyi and F. limnocharis. In the reproductive season, females had lower body condition than males in both species. Gold-stripe pond frogs had larger heads, eyes and limbs than did terrestrial frogs when we statistically controlled for snout-urostyle length. In both species of frogs, limb length was larger in females than in males. Males and females showed different allometric growth patterns in limb length of F. limnocharis, as females grow faster than do males; this sex difference does not occur in P. plancyi.