Abstract:The quest to answer the longstanding question of how safe is safe enough has led to an evolution of design philosophies. The traditional philosophy has been based on ensuring that system capacity exceeds demand. This philosophy has been manifested in such design methods as allowable stress design (ASD) and load and resistance factor design (LRFD). The level of safety in these methods is commonly calibrated to the acceptable practice using structural reliability methods. Such an approach to design aims to balance life safety and construction costs and works relatively well for service loads under which strength is nearly always a sufficient representative of system capacity. Under extreme loads, however, not only do factors such as ductility or energy-dissipation capacity come into play, but also the consequences of failure are vastly larger and may go beyond the failure site. For this reason, the more modern design philosophy of performance-based design emerged. According to this philosophy, a system is designed to meet a target performance, defined by limits on its performance metrics. These metrics were initially defined on structural responses, such as deformations and accelerations, and later evolved into risk measures based on monetary loss, downtime, and casualties. This philosophy is gradually making its way into modern design codes. Typical performance-based criteria focus primarily on what transpires during extreme loads. The need to incorporate the recovery of the system after such events has prompted the design philosophy to make another leap into resilience-based design (RBD). Resilience is defined herein as the ability to recover, within a predetermined period of time, in the aftermath of extreme events. Resilience transcends risk, i.e., a resilience analysis incorporates not only a risk analysis but also a recovery analysis. This paper provides a review of RBD in continuation of PBD and further introduces various applications of RBD into the design and assessment of civil infrastructure. The review covers the state of the art in resilience quantification approaches and associated computational platforms.

Introduction To Resilience-Based Design (Rbd)

Computational framework for Resilience-Based Design (RBD) Ch11

PEOPLES Resilience Framework

Resilience-Based Design (Rbd) Modelling Of Civil Infrastructure To Assess Seismic Hazards

PEOPLES: A Framework for Evaluating Resilience

A Framework for Defining and Measuring Resilience at the Community Scale: the PEOPLES Resilience Framework

From Performance to Resilience-Based Design of Structures - Keynote Lecture

THE P.E.O.P.L.E.S. Resilience Framework: A Conceptual Approach to Quantify Community Resilience

Urban Resilience for Emergency Response and Recovery Fundamental Concepts and Applications Introduction

Resilience of critical structures, infrastructures and communities

Resilience Assessment of Urban Communities

Developing an integrated framework to quantify resilience of urban systems against disasters

The Physical Infrastructure Dimension Of Community Resilience Framework

Performance-based Engineering to Achieve Community Resilience

Disaster Resilience Quantification of Communities: A Risk-Based Approach

Workforce/Population, Economy, Infrastructure, Geography, Hierarchy, and Time (WEIGHT): Reflections on the Plural Dimensions of Disaster Resilience

Framework for Analytical Quantification of Disaster Resilience

A Framework to Quantitatively Assess and Enhance the Seismic Resilience of Communities

Resilience-Based Design of Infrastructure: Review of Models, Methodologies, and Computational Tools

PEOPLES: A Tool to Measure Community Resilience

Measuring and improving community resilience: A fuzzy logic approach