Numerical investigations on drag reduction of a civil light helicopter fuselage
Wenbo Shi,Jie Li,Haoxue Gao,Heng Zhang,Zhao Yang,Youxu Jiang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2020.106104
IF: 5.457
2020-11-01
Aerospace Science and Technology
Abstract:<p>The paper presents the numerical investigations for a light civil helicopter fuselage with the purpose of reducing the helicopter drag. Two numerical methods: Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) and a hybrid RANS-LES method: improved delayed detached-eddy simulation (IDDES) method are performed for the simulation of a prototype helicopter fuselage. The RANS method is validated by a modular helicopter fuselage with experimental data, while the IDDES method has already been used in other studies and good results have been achieved. The numerical results of the civil helicopter in terms of the aerodynamic coefficients obtained by the two methods are consistent with each other. Compared to the RANS method, the IDDES approach is capable of predicting the large separation flow of the fuselage/components and the small-scale vortices in the flow field. It is found that the hybrid method captures the periodically detached separating vortices behind the skid struts, while the flow at the same position simulated by the RANS method is still attached. Moreover, separating vortices, which develop diagonally upwards, are captured at fuselage/tail-boom junction by the hybrid method, whereas RANS simulation doesn't predict. Subsequently, the design of the helicopter drag reduction is carried out at <span class="math"><math>α=0</math></span> deg angle of attack and 0.2 Mach number through shape optimization based on the numerical simulations, and the numerical results are verified by the force tests. It shows that the optimization of the landing skids aims at reducing the strong Karman vortex shedding effect induced by the skids, which greatly decreases the total drag. Combined with the optimization of the fuselage/tail-boom transition, this approach suppresses the separation flow of the fuselage and reduces the pressure drag, and the adjustment of transition slope benefits of up to 1.18% drag reduction, while the extension of transition reduces the drag by 2.64%. The optimization of tail-boom layout demonstrates that lower tail-boom layout can contribute to a drag reduction by 4.37% (RANS) and 3.89% (test), respectively, when compared to the original tail-boom layout.</p>
engineering, aerospace