Abstract:By introducing the change of market share of state-owned enterprises as an exogenous impact on the private enterprise market, this paper analyzes and tests the influence of the market scale change on the distribution of intra-group productivity under equilibrium conditions from theoretical and empirical perspectives. This research has two contributions to the literature: First, it provides empirical tests for the general equilibrium of heterogeneous firm models. Second, it provides a different perspective to understand the relationship between state-owned enterprises and private enterprises.　　Our research finds that: (1) Increasing market share of state-owned enterprises will increase the dispersion of productivity distribution of private enterprises and reduce the efficiency of resource allocation within the group of private enterprises. (2) Increasing market share of state-owned enterprises will raise the level of profit margin of surviving private enterprises, making inefficient private enterprises not eliminated by competition. Theoretical analysis and further tests show that the mechanism of the above results lies in the reduction of the market size, the reduction of the number of enterprises in equilibrium, the reduction of fixed costs and the improvement of profit margin. The conclusion of the study provides a useful perspective for understanding the interaction between state-owned enterprises and private enterprises and enhancing the productivity of the industry.　　When we observe that private enterprises in the industry have a better performance level, we cannot deny that there is no mismatch of resources within private enterprises. In fact, this kind of crowding-out of the market scale of private enterprises by state-owned enterprises formed by policies and institutional advantages will deepen the mismatch of inter-group resources between the two types of enterprises and the mismatch of intra-group resources within private enterprises. The latter has not been noticed in the research literature. An important reason is that the performance premium of private enterprises will cover up this feature.　　This theoretical transmission mechanism is applicable not only to the analysis of the economic impact of the interaction between state-owned enterprises and private enterprises defined in this paper (i.e. crowding out” market share), but also to the analysis of the impact of exogenous changes in the market size on the distribution of enterprise productivity in the industry.

Why Is the Productivity Analysis Misleading for Gauging State Enterprise Performance

Land Use Regulation, Land Reclamation, and Industrial Productivity: Evidence from China

Productivity Performance and Investment Efficiency of China's Private Enterprises

Autonomy and Incentives in Chinese State Enterprises

How Successful Were China's State Sector Reforms?

Privatization and productivity in China

Industrial Productivity Performance in Chinese Regions (1987–2002): a Decomposition Approach

The Empirical Study on Productivity of Chinese Real Estate Enterprises Based on DEA-based Malmquist Model

Factor Distortion,Misallocation and Productivity

The Performance of State-Owned Enterprises: New Evidence from the China Employer-Employee Survey

Productivity Improvement from the Mixed-Ownership Reform: A Financial Frictions Perspective

Reform of state‐owned enterprises and productivity growth in China

Privatization and Innovation: Productivity, New Products, and Patents in China

Crowded Private Enterprises: General Equilibrium Efficiency of Private Enterprises

Efficiency, technical progress, and best practice in Chinese state enterprises (1980–1994)

Can State Owned Enterprises Restructure ? Theory and Evidence from China ( Preliminary , Comments welcome )

State-owned enterprises in China: their reform process, performance efficiency and future road

Do institutions not matter in China? Evidence from enterprise- level productivity growth

Total Factor Productivity Performance of Chinese Enterprises

State Capitalism Vs. Private Enterprise