Abstract:Background: Efforts to harmonize genomic data standards used by the biodiversity and metagenomic research communities have shown that prokaryotic data cannot be understood or represented in a traditional, classical biological context for conceptual reasons, not technical ones. Results: Biology, like physics, has a fundamental duality-the classical macroscale eukaryotic realm vs. the quantum microscale microbial realm-with the two realms differing profoundly, and counter-intuitively, from one another. Just as classical physics is emergent from and cannot explain the microscale realm of quantum physics, so classical biology is emergent from and cannot explain the microscale realm of prokaryotic life. Classical biology describes the familiar, macroscale realm of multi-cellular eukaryotic organisms, which constitute a highly derived and constrained evolutionary subset of the biosphere, unrepresentative of the vast, mostly unseen, microbial world of prokaryotic life that comprises at least half of the planet's biomass and most of its genetic diversity. The two realms occupy fundamentally different mega-niches: eukaryotes interact primarily mechanically with the environment, prokaryotes primarily physiologically. Further, many foundational tenets of classical biology simply do not apply to prokaryotic biology. Conclusions: Classical genetics one held that genes, arranged on chromosomes like beads on a string, were the fundamental units of mutation, recombination, and heredity. Then, molecular analysis showed that there were no fundamental units, no beads, no string. Similarly, classical biology asserts that individual organisms and species are fundamental units of ecology, evolution, and biodiversity, composing an evolutionary history of objectively real, lineage-defined groups in a single-rooted tree of life. Now, metagenomic tools are forcing a recognition that there are no completely objective individuals, no unique lineages, and no one true tree. The newly revealed biosphere of microbial dark matter cannot be understood merely by extending the concepts and methods of eukaryotic macrobiology. The unveiling of biological dark matter is allowing us to see, for the first time, the diversity of the entire biosphere and, to paraphrase Darwin, is providing a new view of life. Advancing and understanding that view will require major revisions to some of the most fundamental concepts and theories in biology.

Microbial Evolution from a Genomics Perspective

Minimal model for genome evolution and growth

Ecology and Evolution of Chromosomal Gene Transfer between Environmental Microorganisms and Pathogens

Toward a Natural History of Microbial Life

Evolutionary change in the human gut microbiome: From a static to a dynamic view

Phylogenetic reconciliation: making the most of genomes to understand microbial ecology and evolution

Genomics and Genome Evolution of Mycobacterium Tuberculosis

Darwinian genomics and diversity in the tree of life

Advances in biodiversity: metagenomics and the unveiling of biological dark matter

Brucella Genomics: Macro and Micro Evolution

Molecular Markers, Natural History and Evolution

Mitogenomics and mitochondrial gene phylogeny decipher the evolution of Saccharomycotina yeasts

Unravelling the enigma of the human microbiome: Evolution and selection of sequencing technologies

Ecology and evolution of bacterial microdiversity

Paleogenomics: reconstruction of plant evolutionary trajectories from modern and ancient DNA

Foundations for reconstructing early microbial life

Parallel Evolution of Genome Streamlining and Cellular Bioenergetics Across the Marine Radiation of a Bacterial Phylum.

Quantifying evolutionary dynamics of the basic genome of E. coli

Microbial taxonomy in the post-genomic era: Rebuilding from scratch?

Evolution: Life has Evolved to Evolve

Green Evolution And Dynamic Adaptations Revealed By Genomes Of The Marine Picoeukaryotes Micromonas