Intergenerational Distributions of Income and Obesity

Qi Zhang,Ning Zhang,Buhong Zheng

2010-01-01

Abstract:BACKGROUND There is continued interest in how human capital is transmitted from one generation to the next. Previous studies focused on intergenerational income mobility or wealth transfer. Little research has examined the relationship between intergenerational income distributions and obesity. OBJECTIVETo examine changes in socioeconomic disparity in obesity between fathers and adult sons. METHODSTheory: The Concentration Index (CI) is widely used to measure socioeconomic disparity in health. Three CIs were calculated based on fathers’ (1st generation) and adult sons’ (2nd generation) obesity status and income. CI(x,y) is defined as generation x’s obesity status as ranked by generation y’s income. CI(1,1) is the CI of fathers’ obesity status ranked by fathers’ income; CI(2,2) is the CI of sons’ obesity status ranked by sons’ income; CI(2,1) is the CI of adult sons’ obesity status, but ranked by fathers’ income. We decomposed the intergenerational changes in socioeconomic disparity in obesity as follows: CI(2,2) – CI(1,1): Overall changes in the socioeconomic disparity over two generations; CI(2,1) – CI(1,1): Intergenerational change in obesity status ranked by fathers’ income; CI(2,2) – CI(2,1): Intergenerational change in obesity disparity due to changes from fathers’ income to sons’ income. In summary, CI(2,2) – CI (1,1) = [CI(2,2) – CI(2,1)] + [CI(2,1) – CI (1,1)] Data: The Panel Study of Income Dynamics (PSID) is the longest panel survey of U.S. individuals and their households with demographic, socioeconomic, and health measures since 1968. Body weight and height were surveyed in 1986 and in 1999 thereafter. Our study population included 1,067 fathers aged 25-45 in 1986 and 1,562 matched sons aged 25-45 in 2005. Two measurements of body weight status were used: Obesity (body mass index (BMI) >=30) and Overweight (BMI>=25). The ranking variable is the predicted income adjusted by demographics, education, and family size. RESULTSCI(2,2) was greater than CI(1,1) in terms of 0.026 (P=0.32) for obesity and 0.053 (P<0.01) for overweight, which indicates increasing socioeconomic disparity in obesity and overweight over generations. However, using fathers’ income ranking, CI(2,1) was less than CI(1,1) in terms of -0.083 (P=0.06) for obesity and -0.043 (P=0.01) for overweight, which indicates that body weight burdens were transferred to sons in the lower income class, as compared to fathers. CI(2,1) was greater than CI(2,2) in terms of 0.109 (P<0.01) for obesity and 0.096 (P<0.01) for overweight, which indicated that using sons’ income ranking resulted in less disparity in obesity or overweight, compared with using fathers’ income ranking. The results indicated an upward mobility in income among sons. CONCLUSIONSThe increasing socioeconomic disparity in obesity can be explained by two intergenerational transfers of human capital: The first is the significant transfer of the obesity burden to sons in the lower income class; the second is the significant upward mobility of adult sons’ income ranking that partially offsets the increases in socioeconomic disparity in obesity. To reduce the intergenerational increase in obesity disparity across income classes, we should not only reduce the obesity burden in low-income young generations, but improve their income equality as well.