Q factor estimation from surface seismic data in the timefrequency domain: A comparative analysis
Ya-Juan Xue,Jun-Xing Cao,Xing-Jian Wang,Hao-Kun Du,Wei Chen,Jia-Chun You,Feng Tan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2021-0210.1
IF: 3.264
2022-03-19
Geophysics
Abstract:The quality factor Q is generally used to describe seismic attenuation that leads to amplitude decay and wavelet distortion. Time-frequency transforms are commonly used to measure quality factor Q on surface seismic data. These methods capture frequency changes over time using a fixed or variable sliding time window. Other adaptive transforms can also provide time localization and they often are superior for Q estimation. In this study, we compared three timefrequency transforms and showed how the choice of a fixed or variabletime window or an adaptive transform affects the accuracy and robustness of Q factor estimation. We used the shorttime Fourier and continuous wavelet transforms as fixed and variablewindow transforms, respectively. The synchrosqueezed wavelet transform was used as an adaptive transform. We compared four Q factor estimation methods in the timefrequency domain, including the amplitude decay, spectral ratio, centroid frequency shift, and compound timefrequency variable methods. Further, we studied some of the difficulties associated with these estimation methods, such as quantitative attenuation sensitivity, noise robustness, regression bandwidth influence, and key parameter selection for each timefrequency transform. Real data examples were used to investigate the robustness of Q factor estimation with different methods using different timefrequency transforms and the statistics of how well the attenuation measurements match the expected seismic attenuation behavior. Furthermore, in these real data examples, we were able to use the Q estimates to compensate for attenuation through inverse Q filtering.
geochemistry & geophysics