Mo1034 Analysis of Endoscopic Resection for Superficial Non-Ampullary Duodenal Tumor
Yasutoshi Ochiai,Teppei Akimoto,Seiji Sagara,Tadateru Maehata,Ai Fujimoto,Rieko Nakamura,Toshihiro Nishizawa,Osamu Goto,Toshio Uraoka,Naohisa Yahagi
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2016.03.545
IF: 10.396
2016-01-01
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
Abstract:Duodenal ESD has not been standardized because of difficulty and a very high risk of complications. However, the surgical treatment loads a large burden and functional disorder may remain depending on the location. Thus, minimally invasive treatment is needed. In this study, the outcomes of 128 duodenal tumors treated at our hospital between July 2010 and June 2015 were investigated, and the safety and efficacy of EMR and ESD were evaluated. The subjects were patients at a mean age of 62.3 years old (29-84), and the sex ratio (male/female) was 92/36. The location of the lesion was bulb in 18, SDA in 14, descending part in 83, LDA in 8, and horizontal part in 5, circumferentiality was <1/2 in 111 and >1/2 in 14, and the macroscopic type was elevated in 97 and depressed in 31. The treatment method employed was EMR in 46, ESD in 74, circumferential EMR in 5, EMRL in 1, and resection by forceps in 3. The mean tumor diameter was 19.1 mm (2-75), and the lesion was adenoma in 85, cancer in 37, carcinoid in 4, and others in 2. The cancer-bearing rates exceed with the tumor size. By the procedure, in 44 lesions treated with EMR (excluding large Brunner gland adenoma in the bulb treated with planned piecemeal resection), the mean tumor diameter was 9.3 mm (3-21), and the lesion was adenoma in 38, adenocarcinoma in 3, carcinoid in 1, and another in 1. The en bloc resection rate was 93% (41/44), and the complete en bloc resection rate was 73% (32/44). No complication occurred (delayed bleeding: 0, perforation: 0). In the 74 lesions treated with ESD, the mean tumor diameter was 25.5 mm (2-75) and mean procedure time was 86.1 minutes (10-360). The lesion was adenoma in 39, adenocarcinoma in 33, and carcinoid in 1. The en bloc resection rate was 97% (72/74), and the complete en bloc resection rate was 82% (61/74). Regarding complications, delayed bleeding and perforation occurred in 5 (7%) and 11 (15%), respectively. All delayed bleeding cases were conservatively treated by endoscopic hemostasis. Perforation required surgical treatment in 2 (3%). This study clarified that the cancer-bearing rate of duodenal tumors rises with an increase in the diameter. For small lesions, EMR with a simple procedure causing fewer complications may be sufficient, but reliable resection is needed for the treatment of large tumors. Although duodenal ESD is very difficult with a high risk, when it is performed by a skilled operator, it may be minimally invasive treatment for which marked efficacy while retaining safety can be expected.