Comparison of the transfection effects on soluble fins-like tyrosine kinase receptor-1 gene mediated by carboxymethylated dextran coated nanoparticle and lipofectamineTM 2000

江丹,吴强,贾丽丽,宋蓓雯,杜新华
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1005-1015.2010.03.09
2010-01-01
Abstract:Objective To compare the transfection effects on soluble fins-like tyrosine kinase receptor1 (sFlt-1) gene (2-4 transcellular region) mediated by carboxymethylated dextran coated nanoparticle and lipofectamineTM 2000. Methods The plasmid pcDNA3. 1-EGFP/sFlt-1(2-4) was constructed and assessed by enzyme cut, electrophoresis, and genetic sequencing. Three groups were divided: nanoparticle group,lipofectamine group, and non-transfeeted group. Twenty-four and 48 hours after the transfection, the distribution of cellular green fluorescence was oberved under the inverted phase contrast fluorescence microseope; the expression rate of green fluorescence was measured by flow cytometry; the expression of sFlt-1(2-4) mRNA and the protein was detected by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RTPCR) and Western blot; the growth of the cells was observed by methyl thiazolyl tetrazolium (MTT)colorimetry and the relative growth rate (RGR) of the cells in each group was ealeulated; the cellular apoptosis in each group was detected by Hoechst staining. Results The sequence of sFlt-1(2-4) gene was equal to 915 base pair (bp). The transfection rate was 45 % in nanoparticle group and 21% in lipofectamine group; the difference between the two groups was significant (t = 2. 541, P<0.05). Forty-eight hours after the transfection, the expression of sFlt-1 (2-4)mRNA and protein was obviously higher in nanopartiele group than that in lipofeetamine group (t= 2.454, 2.398; P<0.05) . Twenty-four and 48 hours after the transfection, the difference of RGR of the cells between nanoparticle and non-transfected group was not significant (t=1. 436, P>0. 05); the RGR in lipofectamine group differed much from that in nontransfected and nanoparticle group (t= 2. 412,2. 545; P<0. 05) ; the difference of cellular apoptosis was not significant between nanoparticle and non-transfected group (t = 1. 436, P > 0. 05), but significant between nanoparticle and lipofectamine group (t= 2. 236, P<0.05). Conclusion The transfection rate of sFlt-1(2-4) mediated by carboxymethylated dextran coated nanoparticle was higher than that mediated by lipofectamineTM 2000.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?