Institutional Distance, Relative Institutional Development and Regional Diversification Strategy of Service Firms: Evidence from Chinese Security Industry

song yuanyang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1008-3448.2015.03.007

2015-01-01

Abstract:The huge domestic market provides Chinese firms with valuable opportunities for regional diversif ication within China. However, most Chinese firms did not utilize the domestic market adequately. Instead of diversifying within China, they prefer to go abroad although it is associated with higher costs and risks. Therefore, an unanswered question is why Chinese firms do not want to diversify within China? And a further question regarding this phenomenon is what the barriers of firm regional diversification within China are? This study, based on the new perspective of institutional distance and with evidence from Chinese security industry, investigates this question theoretically and empirically. The results show that institutional distance between host region and home region has a significantly negative effect on firm regional diversification strategy since institutional distance leads to high transaction and administrative costs, indicating that institutional distance is indeed an important barrier of firm regional diversification. This study further compares the effects of formal and informal institutional distance on firm regional diversification, and finds that relative to formal institutional distance, informal institutional distance has a stronger negative effect on firm regional diversification strategy. In addition, this study investigates the potential moderators regarding the institutional distance-firm regional diversification strategy relationship, and finds that the relationship between institutional distance and regional diversification strategy is moderated by the relative institutional development. Specifically, the inf luence of institutional distance on regional diversification strategy will be weaker when the relative institutional development is high. This finding refutes a commonly accepted assumption in previous studies that the inf luence of institutional distance on firm strategy is solely determined by the absolute value of institutional distance. This study reveals the institutional barriers of firm regional diversification within China, and compares the inf luences of formal and informal institutional distance, which has critical implications for advancing firm regional divarication and enhancing the international competitive advantage of Chinese firms.