Abstract:BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Although anterior cervical decompression and fusion has been used successfully in the treatment of symptomatic radiculopathy and/or myelopathy, biomechanical studies have suggested possible deleterious effects of cervical fusion on adjacent level kinematics. The emergence of cervical arthroplasty as an alternative to arthrodesis may restore a more normal spinal movement and reduces a kinematic strain on adjacent segments. To date, with existing prostheses, the risk adjacent segment disease has not been proven to be reduced using artificial disc replacement. PURPOSE: The study was designed to investigate the surgical techniques and clinical effects of the Discover artificial cervical disc prosthesis in a Chinese population and observe the stability and range of movement in the early and immediate postoperative period. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Our clinical study design was prospective, concurrently enrolled, and single-center trial of the artificial cervical disc prosthesis (DePuy Spine, Raynham, MA, USA) in the treatment of patients with single-and two-level degenerative disc disease of the cervical spine. PATIENT SAMPLE: Procedure was performed in 25 patients. OUTCOME MEASURES: The functional spinal unit (FSU) and global angles, segmental and overall range of motion, FSU heights, and clinical parameters checked with Neck Disability Index (NDI), Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA), Odom's scale, and visual analog scale (VAS) pain score were assessed. METHODS: Twenty-five patients (26 discs) consecutively underwent cervical arthroplasty using the Discover artificial cervical disc in our hospital. Clinical and radiologic follow-up was performed. The radiographic parameters evaluated included the treated segments and the overall curvature of the cervical spine. RESULTS: All the patients were assessed between 12 months and 18 months after surgery (average 15.3 months). According to Odom's scale, all 25 patients (26 levels) had good to excellent outcomes by independent assessment. Mean NDI, JOA, and VAS scores showed statistical improvements in the early and immediate postoperative period. The range of movement recovered to the preoperative value during the follow-up. The treated segment ultimately showed preservation of movement when compared with preoperative levels. No prosthesis subsidence or excursion was identified, and no heterotopic ossification was found in the replaced levels. CONCLUSION: These early results from a small cohort demonstrate that cervical arthroplasty with the Discover artificial cervical disc for the treatment of degenerative cervical disc disease may provide a good clinical outcome and preserves some motion postoperatively. Although early outcomes are promising, this is also a relatively new technology and prosthesis, long-term follow-up studies with larger patient numbers are required to assess safety and efficacy compared with alternative treatments. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

To evaluate clinical outcomes of ProDisc-C cervical disc replacement versus fusion for cervical spondylosis

Cervical Total Disc Replacement is Superior to Anterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion: A Meta-Analysis of Prospective Randomized Controlled Trials

Comparison of Cervical Motor Function Between Artificial Cervical Disc Replacement with Prodisc-C and Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion for the Treatment of Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy

Comparison of the effect of the Prodisc-C cervical disc prosthesis and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion in one level cercical spoudyiosis

Short-and medium-term efficacy of artificial cervical disc replacement versus fusion for cervical spondylosis

Comparison of Cervical Disc Arthroplasty with Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion for the Treatment of Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy.

Comparison on Efficacies of Cervical Spondylosis Treated with Artificial Cervical Disc Replacement and Anterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion

Comparison of Artifical Cervical Disc Replacement Versus Anterior Decompression and Fusion for the Treatment of Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy

An Eight‐Year Follow‐Up Study on the Treatment of Single‐Level Cervical Spondylosis Through Intervertebral Disc Replacement and Anterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion

Early follow-up outcomes after treatment of degenerative disc disease with the discover cervical disc prosthesis.

Effectiveness of cervical disc replacement versus anterior cervical decompression and fusion for single level cervical spondylosis:A systematic review

Meta analysis of cervical disc replacement versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for degenerative cervical syndrome

Initial exploration of clinical outcomes of consecutive two-level cervical artificial disc replacement

Cervical kinematics following cervical intervertebral disc replacement:Validation of 55-case data

A Comparison of Cervical Disc Arthroplasty and Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion in Patients with Two-Level Cervical Degenerative Disc Disease: 5-Year Follow-Up Results

Comparison of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus artificial disc replacement for cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a meta-analysis

Follow-up Study on the Motion Range after Treatment of Degenerative Disc Disease with the Bryan Cervical Disc Prosthesis

Comparison of the Mid-Term Follow-Up Results Between Bryan Cervical Artificial Disc Replacement and Anterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion for Cervical Degenerative Disc Disease

Artificial cervical disc replacement: range of motion of replacement segment and degeneration of adjacent segments

ProDisc–C Versus Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion for the Surgical Treatment of Symptomatic Cervical Disc Disease: Two-Year Outcomes of Asian Prospective Randomized Controlled Multicentre Study

Mid- To Long-Term Outcomes Of Cervical Disc Arthroplasty Versus Anterior Cervical Discectomy And Fusion For Treatment Of Symptomatic Cervical Disc Disease: A Systematic Review And Meta-Analysis Of Eight Prospective Randomized Controlled Trials