Abstract:ASLO is very fortunate in that we have a high (>30%) contingent of “young” (by career stage) members, which is part of the reason ASLO has such tremendous fidelity. One of ASLO's core missions is to foster the professional development of our members at a range of career stages and this goal permeates the new strategic plan, with key strategic goals including professionalization and vitality. The ASLO board has been very supportive of both student and EC members and funds travel awards and workshops, amongst other opportunities. Student and Early Career members are outstanding participants at ASLO meetings, contribute to reviewing for the journal, and serve as meeting mentors. The ASLO Early Career Committee (ECC) is charged with the creation and organization of programs and the development of initiatives targeted to benefit ASLO's early-career members. The interpretation of “early career” status is roughly for members from time of completion of the Ph.D. to 10 years thereafter. The “definition” is not set in stone, to allow for variations in career event timing, reflecting the diversity of career paths our members take, including transitions and non-professional events. The ECC provides support for ASLO early career members, including services in relation to ASLO meetings (e.g., travel awards, networking, mixers, and workshops) as well as providing information on career related opportunities (e.g., job postings, resources, opportunities) mainly communicated through the ASLO website. For example, for the February 2015 Aquatic Sciences meeting in Granada, Spain, the ECC, lead by Laura Bristow (Univ. of Southern Denmark) organized a workshop that provided an overview of the Marie Skłodowska-Curie fellowship programs funded by the European Union. These fellowships are available to individuals wanting to pursue post-doctoral research in Europe and internationally. Beyond an overview, a panel of reviewers, applicants and recipients of the program, the workshop provided access to the Spanish representative of the program (Cristina Gómez Corchete). The workshop was well attended and feedback indicated a huge demand for events of this type. Similar events are organized for ASLO student members (see Wilkinson's article on benefits of student membership in this issue). The evening mixers, held adjacently for students and EC members was much more informal, very well attended and a great opportunity to meet colleagues old and new—drink tickets ran out much before crowds dissipated. To ensure ASLO is serving its EC and student members appropriately and we don't miss any opportunities to meet the needs of our EC and student members, together the ECC and ASLO student board members developed a survey specific for that demographic. In spring of 2015, the survey was sent out to the just shy of 2300 EC and student members. The default was anonymous and voluntary (of course!) participation. Below we list the questions asked, summaries of the responses (quantitative data only) and the actionable items we developed. The latter were inspired by the very thoughtful comments provided by respondents, which unfortunately cannot be reproduced here (the nearly 519 pages were not accepted for inclusion in the Bulletin). Naturally, this survey was not created or analyzed “scientifically” and we only used it to provide information on broad trends. We would welcome any and all comments you might have. Hopefully, this survey will provide insights into how ASLO is and will continue to promote its “younger” members. The survey certainly has been very useful for those of us in charge of creating, developing and organizing programs and events targeted to benefit student and EC members. The survey was emailed to 2293 recipients, all of whom were 2014–2015 EC and student members and of those recipients 430 responded (18% response rate). The response was evenly split between students (218) and EC members (211). The duration of ASLO membership of respondents was well spread, including ~40% (178) first year members, ~20% (81) 2nd year, and ~40% (169) 3+ year members. The current travel award provided for students varies depending on location and ranges from $250 to $750. Early Career travel awards have been fixed at $500 for the last few meetings. We were interested if members felt travel award amounts should be tailored depending on meeting location (recognizing that total funds are not unlimited). Seventy percent (280) of respondents preferred a travel award sum of $500, but both $250 awards (48) and $1000 (65) were thought desirable. A number of comments suggested travel awards of $750. Another item we wanted clarification on, was whether EC and student members thought it was desirable to request travel award applicants or recipients to “give back” to ASLO in some way through volunteering, by enhancing the probability of award success for those who had served the society (by, e.g., reviewing or mentoring). Approximately 75% of respondents (325) thought it was fair and desirable to enhance the probability of an award to those who had contributed to ASLO vs. 98 respondents who did not think it was desirable to do so. Very encouragingly, most respondents stated that they would do anything possible to attend an ASLO meeting, if they could find the necessary funds. Respondents were concerned about carbon footprint issues associated with meeting travel; another common concern stated was how to provide child care. This input mirrors discussions the ASLO Board has been having, reflecting the same concerns. Clearly, ASLO meetings are attractive to EC and student members and a strength the ASLO student board members and ECC will work hard to continue to retain. One of the strengths of ASLO is its commitment to effect change based on members input. As such, the responses summarized above have led to a number of changes, or modifications of current practices of the student and EC committees. Below some highlights: For the 2016 meetings and onwards, travel award allocations will take into account the distance traveled. Given the constraints of handling at times >500 applications, and minimizing the application effort, we will make the travel awards in 2 “flat rate” categories, depending on whether applicants are coming from on- or off- continent, relative to the meeting location ($500 and $750, respectively). While neither amount will cover the entire cost of the meeting, it should alleviate the burden of financing meeting attendance and for many, will provide leverage for other funding sources. Respondents' comments were very thoughtful and pointed to some possible, unintended consequences of proposed travel award changes. For example, it could be hard for students or new members to demonstrate they have contributed to ASLO. For first time applicants, we want the awards to be open to all new members and prior “volunteering” for ASLO will have no bearing on the probability of success. However, if someone has been a member several years and applied several times, they can enhance their award chances by volunteering for ASLO (see below). Lucky for ASLO, many respondents were keenly interested in opportunities to be involved with ASLO. Also luckily, ASLO has many opportunities for volunteer involvement, including committees that need dedicated members, meetings that are enhanced by presentation judges and mentors, and the need for reviewers at all of the ASLO journals. Of course there are also opportunities to review manuscripts and proposals in the broader scientific community. See http://aslo.org/committees/index.html and http://aslo.org/forms/volunteerform.php for ways to volunteer with ASLO. Particularly for the student and EC members, balancing the needs of attending professional meetings and balancing demands of the home life, (including but not limited to child care) is a very demanding task. ASLO does not currently offer childcare at meetings (it has been offered in the past but there were very few users of the service). While there are no “official” rules, children are typically welcome at ASLO meetings. Many parents bring their children to the poster session and there are rooms available for nursing and rooms where caretakers can take their children. ASLO also tries to provide names of local childcare services for parents to contact directly. We will work to make sure that the appropriate information is provided alongside meeting information. Recognizing that travel sometimes is just not possible, or desirable (see carbon footprint issue mentioned above), we are striving to make meetings more available to those who can't travel. While the face-to-face time at meetings might not be replaceable in the short term, there are plenary and award talks from ASLO meetings available online and provided in a user-friendly interface (i.e., YouTube). There is live tweeting at the conference and more is sure to come in the future. In the survey responses, there were diverse requests for funding from ASLO, including requests for international grants, individual research projects/tuition, bridge funding for recent Ph.Ds, to travel grants specific to developing nations. While allocation of funds for individual salaries or research projects is beyond ASLO's scope, there is a strong commitment to providing members with support, including funding, to enhance member's ability to do science and promote their careers. ASLO provides considerable support for these endeavors (e.g., travel awards, reduced registration for student/EC members, waived registration fees for developing nations members). Moreover, ASLO provides training opportunities to enhance the competitiveness of its members in obtaining funding. These are just some of the changes taking effect and we look forward to continued feedback on how we can enhance ASLO services to student and EC members. These improvements would not be possible without the tremendous engagement of student and EC members in ASLO. Thus, most importantly, we thank all of the respondents very much for filling out the online survey. The response was fantastic, both in terms of participation and the level of information provided and gave us much needed guidance for our future efforts, which to a large extent will continue the services ASLO has been offering and now we know with renewed assurance that career building and networking opportunities remain in great demand. Please do not hesitate to contact us with ideas, concerns or compliments. Your guidance of our efforts on behalf of the student and EC ASLO members is essential (and hopefully effective). The student board members and early career committee organize professional development workshops at ASLO conferences. Shown here, Brian Palermo leading “Snap It Up,” a workshop in Granada focused on improving scientific presentations. Photo by Adrienne Sponberg. The mixers for students and early career members at ASLO conferences are always well-attended. Photo by Adrienne Sponberg. We would like to thank Adrienne Sponberg for valuable feedback on this article as well as contributing the photos of early career/student workshops and events.

Abstract:Introduction The 19th Congress of the Austrian Sport Science Society (“Österreichische Sportwissenschaftliche Gesellschaft, ÖSG”), held in Innsbruck, Austria, centered on the theme of” Embracing Interdisciplinarity in Sport Science.” The idea of interdisciplinarity in sport science has been discussed for over three decades and stems from its position as a cross-sectional discipline integrating various natural and social sciences such as training science, sports medicine, biomechanics, sport pedagogy, sport psychology, sport sociology, and sport history. More recently, sports economy and sports management have also emerged as significant areas within sport science. Sports science is characterized by its strong practical relevance. It often focuses on applied research, where interdisciplinarity plays a critical role. Interdisciplinary work is a particularly important factor when approaching sport science from a problem-based perspective (Güllich & Krüger, 2022). Specifically, we argue that interdisciplinarity becomes crucial when we are trying to develop solutions for complex challenges in sport, the health sector, and society in general. For example, an interdisciplinary approach in sport science might merge aspects of psychology, physiology, and sociology with expertise of medical professionals to study and realize health promotion strategies. For the purpose of this editorial, we understand interdisciplinarity as a collaboration between individuals from different scientific disciplines but also from different professions with the goal of combining knowledge and methods to create new solutions for complex societal problems. This can range from the simple communication of ideas and experiences to mutual integration of concepts, methodologies, procedures, or data sharing (Zaiț et al., 2021). We think that sport scientists can and should take a leading role in such collaborations given their unique cross-disciplinary education related to human health, performance, and well-being. Leadership in interdisciplinary collaborations may be an opportunity for us as sport scientists to strengthen our profile and image in the society and to take responsibility in addressing societal challenges (Hottenrott et al., 2017). In preparation of this year’s ÖSG Congress in Innsbruck 2024, we tried to embrace this idea of interdisciplinarity in sport science. Before the event, we conducted an online survey across the DACH region (Germany, Austria, Switzerland) to identify current societal challenges that sport science should address and help with developing solutions. In parallel, we assessed the perceived importance of interdisciplinary work among sport scientists and related professions. Potential respondents to the survey were mainly contacted through the communication channels of the ÖSG and its equivalent associations in Germany (dvs) and Switzerland (SGS). Consequently, respondents included sport scientists as well as professionals from other fields who follow or are part of the activities of sport science associations. The findings of the survey were used in three different ways and will be described in this editorial: to summarize the most frequently mentioned challenges and topics that sport science should address and help with developing solutions, to develop an “Interdisciplinary Innovation Workshop” for the ÖSG Congress in Innsbruck 2024 where delegates transform the identified challenges into specific problems that can be solved, and to compare the survey results with the content of the scientific abstracts submitted to the ÖSG Congress in Innsbruck 2024 and determine the alignment between the identified challenges and current research topics within the ÖSG community. The survey – Current challenges for sport science and beyond The survey responses were analyzed in MAXQDA 24 (VERBI software, 2021). The MAXQDA AI-Assist tool was used to suggest an initial coding scheme to group responses into categories. Two researchers refined the scheme into a final code set, independently coded the participants’ responses, and discussed mismatches to agree on the final code assignments. The survey yielded 176 responses, of which 85 were fully completed. Respondents (42% women) had a mean age of 40.2 years (± 13.8). Regarding their primary professional field, 34% identified as scientists working at a university, college, or research institution, 26% were healthcare professionals (e.g., physicians or therapists), 15% worked in the private sector including self-employment, 13% were students or educators, and 12% were either coaches, athletes, or employed within a sports federation. 91% reported that interdisciplinarity was a key component of their work. The most frequently mentioned challenges fell into the category of “prevention and rehabilitation” (34%), followed by “job profiles related to sport science and exercise therapy” (23%), “sport science mission for research and education” (11%), “broader societal issues” (5%), “structural development of organized and non-organized sports” (5%), “inclusion and integration through sports” (4%), “self-awareness and self-reflection” (3%), “technological progress” (2%), “financing” (2%), and “elite sports” (2%; orange bars in Figure 1). Coding was not possible for 5% of the answers. The workshop – Transforming challenges into specific problems Building on the findings of the survey, we collaborated with the ikivox collective (Nyon, France, https://ikivox.org/en/) to develop an “Interdisciplinary Innovation Workshop” held at the ÖSG Congress in Innsbruck 2024. With the help of ikivox who specialize in collective intelligence and collaborative design approaches, we designed a workshop with the following objectives: to transform the identified challenges into specific problems that can be solved with innovative solutions to experience interdisciplinary collaboration and new ways of working together to position the Austrian Sport Science Society (ÖSG) as an enabler, bringing value to its members to improve exchange about sport science in Austria to identify whether the teamwork could continue on some topics after the Congress with the support of the ÖSG Eventually, 42 Congress delegates signed up for the workshop and could choose to work on one of the following challenges: “physical inactivity at the work place”, “physical inactivity in children”, “image of sport science in society”, “role of exercise therapists in medical teams”, “influence of menstrual cycle on athletic performance”, “health awareness in society”, “inclusion of bodily disabled individuals as participants in public sport events”, and “integration of girls and women with migration background through sports”. This format of collaboration may provide a framework for future interdisciplinary initiatives within the ÖSG and beyond. The Congress abstracts – Comparing the identified challenges with actual research topics at the ÖSG Congress Having identified current challenges for sport science, it seemed of interest to compare those challenges with the content of the submitted scientific contributions to the ÖSG Congress in Innsbruck 2024. The Congress received 78 contributions including 60 regular abstracts, 12 Young Investigator Award submissions and 6 extended abstracts. Five section editors managed the peer-review process and drew on the expertise of 45 peer reviewers. Each contribution was evaluated and rated by two independent reviewers. Critical feedback of reviewers had to be addressed by the authors in revised abstract submissions. Following the revision round, 75 contributions were accepted for presentation at the Congress. The contributions spanned a wide range of research areas including “biomechanics, motor control & sports technology” (26% of abstracts), “sport psychology & pedagogy” (25%), “sports medicine, exercise therapy & public health” (20%), “sports physiology & exercise science” (16%), “sports sociology, economy & management” (14%). Of all contributions, 64 were presented orally and 11 as poster presentations while 65 abstracts were published in the Congress proceedings. When applying the same code set to the abstract submission, we found a remarkable similarity to the survey findings in that 34% of abstracts fell into the category of “prevention and rehabilitation” (blue bars in Figure 1). However, we also found clear mismatches: the content of the abstracts focused much more on “technological progress” (21% vs. 2% in survey), and “elite sports” (15% vs. 2% in survey). Further, while 23% of the survey respondents highlighted challenges in “job profiles related to sport science and exercise therapy”, none of the conference abstracts addressed this topic, indicating a gap between perceived challenges and ongoing research. Summary and outlook At this year’s ÖSG Congress in Innsbruck 2024, we tried to embrace interdisciplinarity in sport science by taking a problem-based approach to sport science. Based on a pre-Congress survey, we identified key challenges within sports and society in general that should be addressed by sport scientists. The most frequently mentioned challenges were related to the topic of “rehabilitation and prevention”, specifically physical inactivity in children and at the workplace. At the Congress, delegates participated in an “Interdisciplinary Innovation Workshop” to work on the identified challenges and transform them into more approachable and specific problems. Interestingly, the topic of “rehabilitation and prevention over the lifespan” was also dominant in a third of scientific contributions to the Congress, showing alignment between perceived challenges and research efforts in the ÖSG community. In contrast, the topics of “elite sports” and “technological progress” were highly represented in Congress abstracts but were not perceived as current challenges in the survey. In turn, more than 20% of survey respondents perceived challenges related to the job profile of sport science alumni and exercise therapists, which were not addressed by Congress abstracts. This potentially highlights the discrepancies between a discipline-based and problem-based applied approach to sport science: In many sub-disciplines of sport science, pushing the boundaries of human performance and health – often with the help of new technologies – remains an important and central basic science goal. However, there may be no apparent or immediate transfer to current challenges in society. From our perspective, both approaches to sport science are valuable as well as needed and we argue that interdisciplinary workshops and initiatives as organized at the ÖSG Congress in Innsbruck 2024 can help to facilitate the transfer of scientific findings from the sport science sub-disciplines to the solution of current challenges in society. The ÖSG plans to facilitate annual meetings of working groups formed at the innovation workshop to support ongoing work on the identified problems, fostering interdisciplinary collaboration, supporting activity within the society, and widening the impact of sport scientists in complex societal challenges. Author contributions JB, GR, KS, LSM, and MM were the section editors for the Congress abstracts. LR and MM conducted the pre-Congress survey and analyzed the responses as well as the Congress abstract content. LR wrote the first editorial draft. All authors edited and approved the final editorial version. References Güllich, A., & Krüger, M. (2022). Sport: Das Lehrbuch für das Sportstudium [Sport: The textbook for sports studies]. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. Hottenrott, K., Baldus, A., Braumann, K.-M., Hartmann-Tews, I., Holzweg, M., Kuhlmann, D., Seyfarth, A., Strauß, B., Sygusch, R., & Vogt, L. (2017). Memorandum Sportwissenschaft [Memorandum sports science]. German Journal of Exercise and Sport Research, 47(4), 287–293. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12662-017-0476-x Zaiț, A., Bratianu, C., Vătămănescu, E.-M., Andrei, A. G., & Horodnic, I. A. (2021). Interdisciplinarity: A complexity approach towards academic research. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 38(3), 294–306. https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.2758

Big Data on Important Issues: Assessing the Needs of Student and Early Career Aquatic Scientists

Early Career Workshop at ASLO Summer Meeting Provides Tips to Improve Funding Success

ASLO takes a step to increase representation in open access publishing

The AAVSO 2011 Demographic and Background Survey

Explore ASLO’s Virtual Issue showcasing high-impact research in aquatic sciences

The Gender Balance of the Australian Space Research Community: A Snapshot from the 16th ASRC, 2016

Exploring how national educational organizations can promote educational research amongst members: a survey-based study

Feedback from the Science Café roundtables at the ninth European Bioanalysis Forum Young Scientist Symposium: optimizing the work–life balance in a bioanalytical laboratory

ASTROMOVES: Astrophysics, Diversity, Mobility

Implementation of a Family Support Grant to Subsidize Caregiving Needs and Support Attendance at American Society for Nutrition's Annual Professional Scientific Conference

The evolution and impact of the Society for Vascular Surgery Resident and Student Program

AMA and SDSMA Membership After Graduation

How to embrace interdisciplinarity in sport science – An approach at the ÖSG Congress Innsbruck 2024

Gender Balance and Inclusion Within The Australian Space Community: An Overview Of Delegates At The 2018 Australian Space Research Conference

Organizing Family Support Services at ACM Conferences

Enhancing Conference Participation to Bridge the Diversity Gap

The Future of ADASS

AMS Early Career Leadership Academy: From Idea to Reality to Evolution

Astro2020 APC White Paper: The Early Career Perspective on the Coming Decade, Astrophysics Career Paths, and the Decadal Survey Process

Studying Gender in Conference Talks -- data from the 223rd meeting of the American Astronomical Society

Asking gender questions: Results from a survey of gender and question asking among UK Astronomers at NAM2014