Abstract:Research Summary By integrating performance feedback theory and ownership management literature, we examine how parent multinational companies (MNCs) evaluate their foreign subsidiaries' poor performance against various aspirations and make multifaceted ownership change decisions. Our results show that social aspirations matter more than historical aspirations in ownership change decisions. When a focal subsidiary is underperforming relative to industry peers or overseas subsidiary peers, its parent MNC tends to change its ownership of foreign subsidiaries and by a high degree. However, regarding the direction of ownership change, a foreign subsidiary with performance below industry peers tends to experience an ownership decrease, whereas the opposite is true when a subsidiary's performance is below overseas subsidiary peers. Overall, we extend existing theories that downplay the role of aspirations in ownership changes. Managerial Summary Effective ownership management in foreign subsidiaries is key to sustaining the global operations of MNCs. An important task for parent managers is to make sense of the poor performance of their foreign subsidiaries against various aspirations and respond in terms of ownership change decisions. We find that managers are more sensitive when their foreign subsidiary's performance is below its social peers than below its past performance. Specifically, parent managers tend to change ownership to a large extent when their foreign subsidiary is poorly performed compared with its industry peers as an external benchmark or overseas subsidiary peers as an internal benchmark. Moreover, parent managers tend to reduce ownership when the subsidiary's performance is below industry peers, while are more likely to increase ownership when the performance is below its overseas subsidiary peers.

Mutual Perception Of Managerial Performance And Style In Multinational Subsidiaries

Managerial Stereotypes in Singaporean Subsidiaries of Multinational Corporations

Stereotypes of the Japanese Manager in Singapore

STEREOTYPING IN AMERICAN, BRITISH, AND JAPANESE CORPORATIONS IN HONG-KONG AND SINGAPORE

Japanese Managers in Southeast Asia: Amiable Superstars or Arrogant Upstarts?

SOME EVIDENCE FOR AN INTERNATIONAL MANAGERIAL CULTURE

JAPANESE AND BRITISH MANAGERIAL COLLEAGUES?HOW THEY VIEW EACH OTHER

Response Styles in A Cross-Cultural Managerial Study

Japanese Managerial Attitudes at Home and Abroad

The Study of Cross-Culturalmanagement Mechanism of Foreign Enterprises in International Entrepreneurship

The Effect of Match or Mismatch between Individual and Organization Expectations on Expatriate Performance

Direct and Stereotype Cultural Differences

Pay Disparity In Multinational And Domestic Firms In China: The Role Of Pro-Disparity Norm

Investigating Managers' Fine-Grained Evaluation Processes In Organizations: Exploring Two Dual-Process Perspectives

Cross-Cultural Differences In Conflict Management An Inductive Study Of Chinese And American Managers

INTERCULTURAL INTERPERSONAL PERCEPTIONS

Coping with Cultural Differences: Comparison of American Managers in Japan and Thailand

Hofstede, Schwartz, or managerial perceptions? The effects of different cultural distance measures on establishment mode choices by multinational enterprises

Managing in the International Context: Testing Cultural Generality of Sources of Commitment to Multinational Enterprises

The Multifaceted Ownership Change of Foreign Subsidiaries: the Diverse Responses to Different Types of Negative Performance Feedback

The Cultural Context of Expatriate Adaptation: American and Japanese Managers Abroad.