Hybrid Mesons, Multiquarks and Molecular States
Xiaoyan Shen,Ning Wu,Guofa Xu,Hu Qin,Shan Jin,Hong-Ying Jin,Shi-Lin Zhu
2006-01-01
Abstract:According to the constituent quark model (CQM), mesons and baryons are composed of qq̄ and qqq respectively. CQM provides a convenient framework in the classification of hadrons. Most of experimentally observed hadron states fit into this scheme quite neatly. Any states beyond CQM are labelled as ”non-conventional” hadrons. However, CQM is only a phenomenological model. It’s not derived from the underlying theory of the strong interaction—Quantum Chromodynamics (QCD). Hence the CQM spectrum is not necessarily the same as the physical spectrum in QCD, which remains ambiguous and elusive after decades of intensive theoretical and experimental exploration. No one is able to either prove or exclude the existence of these non-conventional states rigorously since nobody can solve the confinement issue in QCD now. Hadron physicists generally take a modest and practical attitude. If one supposes these non-conventional states exist, then the important issues are: (1) How to determine their characteristic quantum numbers and estimate their masses, production cross-section and decay widths reliably? (2) How and in which channels to dig out the signal from backgrounds and identify them experimentally? There are three classes of ”non-conventional” hadrons. The first class are mesons with ”exotic” J quantum numbers. The possible angular momentum, parity and charge conjugation parity of a neutral qq̄ meson are J = 0, 0−+, 1, 1−−, 1+−, · · · . In other words, a qq̄ meson can never have J = 0−−, 0+−, 1−+, 2+−, 3−+, · · · . Any state with these ”exotic” quantum numbers is clearly beyond CQM. We want to emphasize they are ”exotic” only in the context of CQM. One can construct color-singlet local operators to verify that these quantum numbers are allowed in QCD. ”Exotic” quantum numbers provide a powerful method for the experimental search of these ”non-conventional” states. In contrast, a qqq baryon in CQM exhausts all possible J , i.e., J = 12 ± , 3 2 ± , 52 ± , · · · . The second class are hadrons with exotic flavor content. One typical example is the Θ pentaquark. It was discovered in Kn channel with the quark content uudds̄. Such a state is clearly beyond CQM. Exotic flavor content is also an asset in the experimental search of them. The third class are hadrons which have ordinary quantum numbers but do not easily fit into CQM. Let’s take the J = 0 scalar mesons as an example. Below 2 GeV, we have σ, f0(980), f0(1370), f0(1500), f0(1710), f0(1790), f0(1810). Within CQM there are only two scalars within this mass range if we ignore the radial excitations. With radial excitations, CQM could accommodate four scalars at most. Clearly there is serious overpopulation of the scalar spectrum. If all the above states are genuine, the quark content of some of them is not qq̄. Overpopulation of the spectrum provides another useful window in the experimental search of non-conventional states. Glueballs are hadrons composed of gluons. Quenched lattice QCD simulation suggests the scalar glueball is the lightest. Its mass is around (1.5 ∼ 1.7) GeV. Glueballs with the other quantum numbers are high-lying. In the large Nc limit, glueballs decouple from the conventional qq̄ mesons [1]. Moreover, one gluon splits into two gluons freely in this limit. Hence the number of the gluon field inside glueballs is indefinite when Nc → ∞. In the real world with Nc = 3, glueballs mix with nearby qq̄ mesons with the same quantum numbers, which renders the experimental identification of scalar glueballs very difficult. Reviews of glueballs can be found in the previous chapters. In the following we discuss the other non-conventional hadrons according to their underlying quark gluon structure.