Cash-in-Advance framework against the Quantity Theory of Money

kwangwon ahn,daeyong lee
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2557990
2015-01-01
Abstract:This article revisits the Lucas illustration of the Quantity Theory of Money (QTM) and investigates whether it holds in the US monetary market. The findings confirm that QTM does not hold in the short run and the Cash-in-Advance (CIA) model fails to replicate these empirical results because the economy under the CIA framework reacts too quickly to monetary shocks. To correct for this failure, this article incorporates the financial intermediary and default as an equilibrium phenomenon into the original CIA model. The results suggest that the modified CIA model fits the short-run QTM abnormality better compared to the original model.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?