Effects of Dietary Protein Levels on the Long-Term Growth Response and Fitting Growth Models of Gibel Carp(carassius Auratus Gibelio)

Biao Yun,Xiaotong Yu,Min Xue,Ying Liu,Jia Wang,Xiufeng Wu,Fang Han,Xufang Liang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aninu.2015.05.003
IF: 5.285
2015-01-01
Animal Nutrition
Abstract:A 41-wk growth trial was conducted to evaluate the effects of dietary protein levels on the long-term growth response and fitting growth models of gibel carp (Carassius auratus gibelio) with an initial body weight of 1.85 ± 0.17 g. The dietary protein levels were designed at 320 (P32), 360 (P36), 400 (P40), and 440 g/kg (P44), respectively. The growth curves of the gibel carp for each group were fitted and analyzed with four nonlinear regression models (Gompertz, logistic, von Bertalanffy and Richards). The final body weights (mean ± SD) of the fish were 226 ± 6, 231 ± 7, 242 ± 2, and 236 ± 2 g for P32, P36, P40, and P44, respectively. Feed conversion ratio of P40 and P44 groups was significantly lower than that of P32 and P36 groups (P < 0.05). Productive protein value of P44 group was significantly lower than that of P32 and P36 groups, but not different from that of P40 group (P ≥ 0.05). The growth response of the gibel carp for each group was the best fitted by Richards model with the lowest Chi2, residual sum of squares and residual variance, then Gompertz and von Bertalanffy growth models, but the logistic model did not fit the data well justified by Chi2 values. The optimal protein level (400 g/kg) prolonged the stage of fast growth and predicted the highest asymptotic weight, which was close to the harvest size in practice.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?