Abstract:Objective: Driving behavior is the key feature for determining the nature of traffic stream qualities and reflecting the risk of operating environments. However, evaluating the driving risk accurately and practically in continuous tunnels (tunnels with a space more than 250 m and less than 1000 m) still faces severe challenges due to the complex driving conditions. The objective of this study is to predict the driving risk indicators and determine different risk levels.Methods: The naturalistic driving system equipped with a road environment and driving behavior data acquisition system combined with the fixed-point test method was used for data collection in 130 tunnels on four highways. A traditional AASHTO braking model and convex hull algorithm were adopted to predict the critical safety speed and the critical time headway of each risk feature point in tunnels. According to the risk constraints under free-flow, car-following and lane-changing conditions, the average traffic flow risk index (TFRI) representing six risk levels and the safety threshold of the corresponding risk indicators were determined.Results: The findings of this study revealed that the critical safety speed at nighttime is slower than in other daytime conditions in continuous tunnels. The time headway slightly changes under 90 km/h. As the speed continues to increase, speed has a significant influence on the critical time headway. The only reliable interaction involved the different adverse weather conditions on the mean critical safety speed in the continuous tunnels (short plus long) (F = 9.730, p＜0.05) and single long tunnels (F = 12.365, p＜0.05).Conclusions: It can be concluded that driving behaviors significantly vary in different tunnel risk feature points and the combined effect of high speed and luminance variation may result in high driving risk. The performance validation indicted that the risk assessment level determined by the proposed approach is consistent with the real safety situations. The study provides an effective and generally acceptable method for identifying driving risk criteria that can also be applied for traffic management and safety countermeasures with a view to possible implementation in continuous tunnels.

Safety Evaluation of a Bridge-Tunnel Connecting Section of Mountainous Highways Based on Drivers’ Heart Rate

Research on Optimized Design of Bridge-Tunnel Linkage Sections on Mountainous Highways Considering the Effect of Crosswind on Driver Behavior

Safety Evaluation of Freeway Tunnel Groups in Mountainous Areas

Research on Driver Physiological Load at the Lowest Point of City River-crossing Tunnels

Safety Evaluation Methods for Long Tunnels on Freeways in China

Impact of Environment Factors of Highway Tunnel Entrance Section on Drivers' Physiology

Incorporating safety speed analysis into highway safety assessment

Voluntary killer: Multivariate highway geometric factors contributing to crashes and collisions in China's mountainous regions

Crash analysis of mountainous freeways with high bridge and tunnel ratios using road scenario-based discretization

Driver's Physiological Responses to Negotiating Urbanization Highways of Varying Complexity.

Fuzzy Evaluation of the Impact of Vehicle Bumping at Bridge-Head on Driving Safety

Modeling Drivers' Heart Rate and Highway Alignment Relationship on Long Steep Downgrades

Accident Risk and the Improvement of Freeway Influenced by High-Speed Train

Study on Evaluation Models of Highway Safety Based on Catastrophe Theory

Drivers' Heart-Rate Variability Effects of Horizontal Alignment of Expressway

Supporting driver performance in closely spaced tunnel-interchange structure: Traffic control devices and effects on driving behavior

Driving risk assessment using driving behavior data under continuous tunnel environment

Design Consistency Evaluation Methods for Freeway Long Tunnels in China

Safety Evaluation of Highway Based on the Traffic Conflict Technique

Driver's Physiological and Mental Reaction in Tunnel

Driver Factor Characteristics of Traffic Safety on the Low Traffic Volume Qinghai-Tibet Highway in China