Abstract:Abstract Background In meta-analyses of a binary outcome, double zero events in some studies cause a critical methodology problem. The generalized linear mixed model (GLMM) has been proposed as a valid statistical tool for pooling such data. Three parameter estimation methods, including the Laplace approximation (LA), penalized quasi-likelihood (PQL) and adaptive Gauss–Hermite quadrature (AGHQ) were frequently used in the GLMM. However, the performance of GLMM via these estimation methods is unclear in meta-analysis with zero events. Methods A simulation study was conducted to compare the performance. We fitted five random-effects GLMMs and estimated the results through the LA, PQL and AGHQ methods, respectively. Each scenario conducted 20,000 simulation iterations. The data from Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were collected to form the simulation settings. The estimation methods were compared in terms of the convergence rate, bias, mean square error, and coverage probability. Results Our results suggested that when the total events were insufficient in either of the arms, the GLMMs did not show good point estimation to pool studies of rare events. The AGHQ method did not show better properties than the LA estimation in terms of convergence rate, bias, coverage, and possibility to produce very large odds ratios. In addition, although the PQL had some advantages, it was not the preferred option due to its low convergence rate in some situations, and the suboptimal point and variance estimation compared to the LA. Conclusion The GLMM is an alternative for meta-analysis of rare events and is especially useful in the presence of zero-events studies, while at least 10 total events in both arms is recommended when employing GLMM for meta-analysis. The penalized quasi-likelihood and adaptive Gauss–Hermite quadrature are not superior to the Laplace approximation for rare events and thus they are not recommended.

Generalized linear mixed models: An improved estimating procedure

A Unified Bayesian Inference Framework for Generalized Linear Models

Asymptotic Results for Penalized Quasi-Likelihood Estimation in Generalized Linear Mixed Models

Asymptotic Properties of Estimation in Generalized Partial Linear Mixed Models

Laplace approximation, penalized quasi-likelihood, and adaptive Gauss–Hermite quadrature for generalized linear mixed models: towards meta-analysis of binary outcome with sparse data

Approximate Marginal Likelihood Inference in Mixed Models for Grouped Data

General Design Bayesian Generalized Linear Mixed Models

Robustified Maximum Likelihood Estimation in Generalized Partial Linear Mixed Model for Longitudinal Data

Exact gradient evaluation for adaptive quadrature approximate marginal likelihood in mixed models for grouped data

Penalized Lq-likelihood estimator and its influence function in generalized linear models

Efficient Estimation of Generalized Additive Partially Linear Model

Marginally Interpretable Generalized Linear Mixed Models

Robust Estimation in Generalized Semiparametric Mixed Models for Longitudinal Data

Efficient and Robust Estimation for a Class of Generalized Linear Longitudinal Mixed Models

Robust empirical likelihood inference for generalized partial linear models with longitudinal data

An Extended Empirical Likelihood for Generalized Linear Models

Combining Quasi and Empirical Likelihoods in Generalized Linear Models with Missing Responses.

Restricted maximum likelihood estimation in generalized linear mixed models

Erratum to: Smoothing combined generalized estimating equations in quantile partially linear additive models with longitudinal data

glmmPen: High Dimensional Penalized Generalized Linear Mixed Models

Efficient computation of high-dimensional penalized generalized linear mixed models by latent factor modeling of the random effects