Abstract:Three strictly comparable cross-section household dataset,related to 1988,1995 and 2001,are used to analyze the rapid yet unequal growth of wage and the sharp widening of wage structure.Earnings functions are compared and the increase in both the level and the inequality of wages are decomposed into their constituent elements.Distinctions are made between the variables likely to represent human capital,discrimination,and segmentation.The evidence suggests that productive characteristics were increasingly rewarded as marketization The Gini coefficient of earnings rose by 10.7 percentage points in the first phase from 1988 to 1995.Whereas the mean wage increased by 67 percent,the pay of the 10th percentile rose by only 22 percent,and that of the 90th percentile rose by 97 percent.These changes are much larger than those of the second phase from 1995 to 2001.Moreover,the returns to education rose sharply,as did the returns to occupation-specific skills.The initially slight inverse-U shape of the age-earnings profile became more pronounced: a change consistent with human capital theory.Thus the productive characteristics of workers were increasingly rewarded in the labor market.However,there were also signs of greater wage discrimination against women.Moreover,the market forces operating in the growing private sector and the relative immunity of the state sector from those forces generated greater wage segmentation among types of ownership,and provincial differences in the pace of reform and in economic growth created spatial segmentation in wages that could not be removed by the equilibrating movement of labor.Decomposition analyses were conducted in order to examine the contribution of particular characteristics to the rise in the Gini coefficient.Only a third of earnings inequality and its increase could be explained: the unobserved determinants are clearly important to the increase in earnings dispersion.The discrimination variables accounted for only a small part of the increase.The segmentation variables made the most important contribution,and that was mainly due to growing wage dispersion among provinces.This result is supported by other evidence of powerful divergence in mean earnings among provinces(Knight,Li and Zhao,2001).Some but not all components of human capital were disequalizing.These particular changes are likely to represent the stirring of labor market forces.

Wages, Schooling and Background: Investments in Men and Women in Urban Brazil

Health and Wages: Evidence on Men and Women in Urban Brazil.

Occupational specialization, skills, and urban wage premium in Brazil

Marketization and Unequal Growth of Wage: Their Extent and Influence Factors

Occupational Segregation and Its Effect on Estimates of the Gender Wage Differential:Evidence from 2002 UHS Data

Family Background and Returns to Schooling——Evidence from 2002 UHS Data

Wage Inequality and Job Stability

Labor Market Outcomes and Early Schooling: Evidence from School Entry Policies Using Exact Date of Birth

The returns to formality and informality in urban Africa

Labor market and crisis: an analysis of sectoral segmentation in Brazilian rural

The intersection between traditional roles and a fragmented labor market: a propensity score matching analysis of gender wage gap in Ecuador

Inherited cultural diversity and wages: surname-based evidence

Sources of the Union Wage Gap: Results from High-Dimensional Fixed Effects Regression Models

The psychology of working: first evidence with Brazilian workers

Workforce Composition, Productivity, and Labor Regulations in a Compensating Differentials Theory of Informality

Sense And Sensibility: A History Of The Early Brazilian Cost-Of-Living Indexes In Pursuit Of A Minimum Wage, 1935–1939

Gender-based occupational segregation: a bit string approach

Occupational Choice, Matching, and Earnings Inequality

Gender specific human capital and knowledge spillovers: a comparative analysis of the US and Brazil

Wage and earnings inequality between and within occupations: The role of labor supply

Gender Differences in Wage Expectations