Oil Shocks and Price Stability

Yi Wen,Luke M. Shimek

DOI: https://doi.org/10.20955/es.2007.28

2007-01-01

Economic Synopses

Abstract:While oil prices are near record highs, the U.S. economy has yet to experience a sharp rise in inflation as it did in the 1970s and early 1980s. Why the difference? The relationship between oil prices and the U.S. economy has gone through dramatic changes since the 1980s.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Oil Price Shocks and Inflation Risk

Mingyu Chen,Yi Wen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.20955/es.2011.19

2011-01-01

Economic Synopses

Abstract:Oil price shocks appear to have only transitory effects on headline inflation and virtually no impact on measures of underlying trend inflation.
Understanding the Large Negative Impact of Oil Shocks

Luis Aguiar-Conraria,Yi Wen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1538-4616.2007.00051.x

IF: 1.963

2007-01-01

Journal of money credit and banking

Abstract:This paper offers a plausible explanation for the close link between oil prices and aggregate macroeconomic performance in the 1970s. Although this link has been well documented in the empirical literature, standard economic models are not able to replicate this link when actual oil prices are used to simulate the models. In particular, standard models cannot explain the depth of the recession in 1974-75 and the strong revival in 1976-78 based on the oil price movements in that period. This paper argues that a missing multiplier-accelerator mechanism from standard models may hold the key.
Understanding the Impact of Oil Shocks

Yi Wen

2005-01-01

Abstract:This paper provides new empirical evidence on and theoretical support for the close link between oil prices and aggregate macroeconomic performance in the 1970s. Although this link has been well documented in the empirical literature and is fur- ther confirmed in this paper, standard economic models are not able to replicate this link when actual oil prices are used to simulate the models. In particular, standard models cannot explain the depth of the recession in 1974-75 and the strong revival in 1976-78 based on the oil price movements in that period. This paper argues that a missing multiplier-accelerator mechanism from standard models may hold the key. This multiplier-accelerator mechanism not only exacerbated the impact of the oil shocks in 1973-74 but also helped create the temporary recovery in 1976-78. This paper derives the missing multiplier-accelerator mechanism from externalities in general equilibrium. Our calibrated model can explain both the recession in 1974-75 and the revival in 1976-78.
Oil Price Shocks and Macroeconomy

Xu Jian-gang,Song Peng,Li Zhi-guo

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1005-9679.2006.03.003

2006-01-01

Abstract:This paper reports on developments in theoretical and empirical understanding of the transmission mechanisms of oil price shocks, the asymmetric impacts of oil price shocks on economic growth and inflation, and the monetary policy implications of increased oil prices.
The Relationship Between Oil Price Shocks and China'S Macro-Economy: an Empirical Analysis

Limin Du,Yanan He,Chu Wei

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2010.03.042

IF: 9

2010-01-01

Energy Policy

Abstract:This paper investigates the relationship between the world oil price and China’s macro-economy based on a monthly time series from 1995:1 to 2008:12, using the method of multivariate vector autoregression (VAR). The results show that the world oil price affects the economic growth and inflation of China significantly, and the impact is non-linear. On the other hand, China’s economic activity fails to affect the world oil price, which means that the world oil price is still exogenous with respect to China’s macro-economy in time series sense, and China has not yet had an oil pricing power in the world oil markets. The structural stability tests demonstrate that there is a structural break in the VAR model because of the reforms of China’s oil pricing mechanism, thus it is more appropriate to break the whole sample into different sub-samples for the estimation of the model.
OPEC's Oil Exporting Strategy and Macroeconomic (In)stability

Luis Aguiar-Conraria,Yi Wen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2011.03.014

IF: 12.8

2011-01-01

Energy Economics

Abstract:Aguiar-Conraria and Wen (2008) argued that dependence on foreign oil raises the likelihood of equilibrium indeterminacy (economic instability) for oil importing countries. We argue that this relation is more subtle. The endogenous choices of prices and quantities by a cartel of oil exporters, such as the OPEC, can affect the directions of the changes in the likelihood of equilibrium indeterminacy. We show that fluctuations driven by self-fulfilling expectations under oil shocks are easier to occur if the cartel sets the price of oil, but the result is reversed if the cartel sets the quantity of production. These results offer a potentially interesting explanation for the decline in economic volatility (i.e., the Great Moderation) in oil importing countries since the mid-1980s when the OPEC cartel changed its market strategies from setting prices to setting quantities, despite the fact that oil prices are far more volatile today than they were 30 years ago.
Dynamic Effects and Driving Intermediations of Oil Price Shocks on Major Economies

Jie Lin,Hao Xiao,Jian Chai

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2023.106779

IF: 12.8

2023-01-01

Energy Economics

Abstract:Interest in oil price shocks' economic effects has grown in recent years. However, previous studies mostly failed to clarify the dynamic transmissions of oil price shocks on representative economies from global and driver perspectives, even ignoring oil price fluctuations when linking oil prices and economy together. This paper examines the dynamic relationships and driving intermediations between multiple oil price shocks and macroeconomy by applying Bayesian vector autoregressive models with stochastic volatility and time-varying parameters, using the USA, China, the Euro-19, and Japan as research objects. Results show that, in the whole sample, all oil prices have the strongest effects on Japan, followed by China, Euro-19, and the USA, with possible directional differences. All oil prices' economic effects intensified during the crisis and Covid-19, accompanying significant oil price fluctuations. Regarding asymmetry, in the whole sample and critical times, stronger effects of rising oil prices show in the short term, but opposite in the long term. Consumer price, interest rate, and exchange rate are the general intermediations of oil prices in China and the USA, Euro-19, and Japan, respectively, and exchange rate is the additional intermediation in China, Euro-19, and Japan during the crisis and Covid-19. Overall, the results are solid.
Influence of Sharp Fluctuation of Oil Price at a High Level on China's Economy in 2008

王光照,袁玲玲

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3772/j.issn.1009-8623.2009.03.007

2009-01-01

Abstract:Large-scale and quick fluctuation of the international oil price rarely occurred in 2008.Through analyses of the characteristics and reasons of the current oil price fluctuation,this article expounds the influence of oil price fluctuation on Chinese economy and accordingly set forth suggestions.The reasonable and stable oil price will help soundly develop Chinese economy and relieve the domestic inflation pressure.It is the top priority to take measures to improve Chinese oil security system and ease the negative effects of oil price fluctuation in order to promote the economic development and guard the social stability.
Oil Price Uncertainty and the Macroeconomy

Athanasios Triantafyllou,Nikolaos Vlastakis,Neil Kellard

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4790038

2024-01-01

SSRN Electronic Journal

Abstract:This paper examines the impact of oil price uncertainty shocks on economic activity. To do so, we define the uncertainty shock as the unanticipated component of oil price fluctuations. We find this unanticipated component has a significantly negative and long-lasting impact on economic activity, with its cumulative effect on the US economy being much larger compared to that of popular uncertainty proxies such as stock market volatility, macroeconomic uncertainty and Economic Policy Uncertainty. Unlike our preferred measure of oil price uncertainty, volatility and spikes in oil futures prices present only a small and transitory effect on the real economy. Overall, our findings show that the US macroeconomy is significantly impaired when the degree of oil price unpredictability rises, while it is relatively immune to predictable fluctuations in the oil market.
Not All Oil Price Shocks Are Alike. A Replication of Kilian (American Economic Review, 2009)

Rich Ryan,Nyakundi Michieka

2024-09-02

Abstract:The price of oil can rise because of a disruption to supply or an increase in demand. The nature of the price change determines the dynamic effects. As Kilian (2009) put it: "not all oil price shocks are alike." Using the latest available data, we extend Kilian's (2009) analysis using the R ecosystem and provide more evidence for Kilian's (2009) conclusions. Inference based on unknown conditional heteroskedasticity strengthens the conclusions. With the updated shocks, we assess how a local economy responds to the global oil market, an application that is relevant to policymakers concerned with the transition away from fossil fuels.

General Economics
Business cycles in the USA: the role of monetary policy and oil shocks

Cosmas Dery,Apostolos Serletis

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-024-02556-5

IF: 3.2

2024-02-13

Empirical Economics

Abstract:This paper examines the relative significance of oil supply, oil demand, and monetary policy shocks in explaining US macroeconomic variations. We analyze impulse response functions and variance decomposition to assess the relative importance of these shocks. Using a Bayesian structural VAR framework and the penalty function approach, we identify the shocks of interest. We find that oil supply shocks explain less than 3% of the variation in output, but have a relatively larger impact on inflation, accounting for around 13% of the inflation variation. Oil demand shocks explain 3% of output variation, but contribute significantly to inflation variation (around 16%). In contrast, monetary policy shocks have a greater influence on output, explaining approximately 13% of the observed variation. Monetary policy shocks are also the most influential source of inflation variation, contributing over 24% to the overall variation. Based on historical variance decomposition, we find that the recent inflation surge is attributable to both monetary expansion and oil supply factors. Overall, the study highlights the dominance of monetary policy shocks in explaining US macroeconomic fluctuations, with oil supply and demand shocks playing secondary roles.

economics,social sciences, mathematical methods
Transmissions of Structural Oil Shocks to Core Prices

Sangheon AhnSoojin JoSchool of Economics,Yonsei University,Seoul South Korea

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1226508x.2024.2306161

2024-02-07

Global Economic Review

Abstract:This paper investigates how structural oil market shocks transmit through real oil price changes to the U.S. core prices. Separating out the sources of oil price increases reveals that supply shocks lead to significant and persistent increases in core prices while oil inventory demand shocks pull them down. Other demand-driven shocks do not cause any significant core price fluctuations. Examining different sample periods, we find empirical evidence supporting the strengthening of the oil price pass-through to some degree since mid-1980; however, not much change in the pass-through has been observed since the outbreak of Covid-19. Our findings highlight that understanding the sources of oil price changes is crucial for gauging their impacts on core prices and furthermore, for the conduct of monetary policy.

economics
Rising international crude oil prices and their macroeconomic impact on China, the U.S. and Japan

Wu Libo,Hua Min

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1004-7298.2008.01.019

2008-01-01

Abstract:Between 2002 and 2007, the global rise in crude oil prices was characterized by a number of features: 1) A long cycle of continuously rising oil prices, with sharp jumps in price; 2) The rise in oil prices was closely connected with the depreciation of the US dollar; 3) The spot market was feeling a steadily increasing impact from speculation on the crude oil futures market. Between 2003 and 2006, oil price fluctuations appeared to be having only a weak impact on the world economy. By 2007, however, macroeconomic indicators were beginning to fluctuate among the world's major economies, and the true impact of high oil prices began to emerge. This study analyzes the macroeconomic impact of fluctuating crude oil prices on the United States, Japan and China since 2002, applying a new asymmetric cointegration testing methodology. The data up to 2002, it is discovered, lead to a different conclusion than the data up to 2007. In recent years, the impact of crude oil prices on the supply side and on the demand side has undergone a transformation. The macroeconomic impact of crude oil prices is dependent on the structure of an economy's industry and fuel consumption. Fluctuations in crude oil prices bear a long-term, stable cointegration relationship with prices overall, but the32mechanisms by which this impact is transmitted are far more complex than was originally believed.
The Opec Oil Shock Crisis (1973): An Analysis

DOI: https://doi.org/10.55057/ajrbm.2022.4.1.12

2022-03-01

Asian Journal of Research in Business and Management

Abstract:The OPEC Oil Embargo (1973) was precipitated by the Yom Kippur War. The United States was the first country to be sanctioned by Saudi Arabia, Libya, and other Arab countries on October 19, 1973 for its political and military support for Israel (particularly through the delivery of military equipment and arms, which played a key role in Israel's wars against neighboring countries). The 1973 Oil Embargo put a strain on a United States economy that had become increasingly reliant on foreign oil. The research is conducting to analyse the The Opec Oil Price Shock Crisis (1973) and Impact to United States of America. The objectivof this study is to examine the OPEC Oil Price Shock Crisis impact to United States of America. The concept of national interest is used to support the action of United States of America in solving the the crisis. The study is being carried out using a qualitative approach, including data gathered from secondary sources. The secondary data in this study also consists of printed and digital material gathered from articles and books. Findings of the study are several impacts that have a significant impact on the United States where it has already had an impact on the economy, politics and also the United States relationship with the OPEC organization. One of the obvious impacts is from an economic point of view. The U.S. economy undeniably experienced a downward trend during the oil crisis. It left no lasting impression, even more than a year on the United States. Not to forget the impact on U.S. politics. U.S. politics is seen as less stable and volatile after the oil crisis. But the United States Government is still able to work together to overcome this problem. Not to forget the impact on US relations and the OPEC Organization. The relationship between the two was seen to erode when the crisis began and in 1974 to 1975 witness their recovery phase but this crisis has taught the United States not to be too dependent on oil resources from foreign countries.
The 2006-2008 Oil Bubble and Beyond

D. Sornette,R. Woodard,W.-X. Zhou

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2009.01.011

2008-07-23

Abstract:We present an analysis of oil prices in US$ and in other major currencies that diagnoses unsustainable faster-than-exponential behavior. This supports the hypothesis that the recent oil price run-up has been amplified by speculative behavior of the type found during a bubble-like expansion. We also attempt to unravel the information hidden in the oil supply-demand data reported by two leading agencies, the US Energy Information Administration (EIA) and the International Energy Agency (IEA). We suggest that the found increasing discrepancy between the EIA and IEA figures provides a measure of the estimation errors. Rather than a clear transition to a supply restricted regime, we interpret the discrepancy between the IEA and EIA as a signature of uncertainty, and there is no better fuel than uncertainty to promote speculation!

General Finance,Data Analysis, Statistics and Probability,Physics and Society
Oil price regimes and their role in price diversions from market fundamentals

Robert. K. Kaufmann,Caitlin Connelly

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-020-0549-1

IF: 56.7

2020-02-01

Nature Energy

Abstract:Speculative bubbles, market governance and property rights are thought to affect oil prices, but their timing and magnitude are uncertain. Here, we quantify these effects using econometric techniques that identify periods between 1938:1 and 2018:3 (denoting year:quarter) when prices strayed from the levels implied by market fundamentals. We identify nine price regimes that are associated with the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries gaining control over the marginal supply of crude oil, US energy legislation, a precautionary demand shock, the Arab Spring and speculative bubbles. These bubbles raised real oil prices by US$14.31 and US$4.65 per barrel in 2007:4–2008:3 and 2010:1–2011:1, respectively, which transferred US$42.8 billion from US consumers to US oil producers and US$87.4 billion from the US economy to oil exporting nations. Conversely, some sharp changes, such as the price decline associated with the Asian financial crisis, can be explained by market fundamentals.

materials science, multidisciplinary,energy & fuels
Oil Price Shocks and Their Short- and Long-Term Effects on the Chinese Economy

Weiqi Tang,Libo Wu,ZhongXiang Zhang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2010.01.002

2009-01-01

SSRN Electronic Journal

Abstract:A considerable body of economic literature shows the adverse economic impacts of oil-price shocks for the developed economies. However, there has been a lack of empirical study of this kind on China and other developing countries. This paper attempts to fill this gap by answering how and to what extent oil-price shocks impact China's economy, emphasizing on the price transmission mechanisms. To that end, we develop a structural vector auto-regressive model. Our results show that an oil-price increase negatively affects output and investment, but positively affects inflation rate and interest rate. However, with the differentiated price control policies for materials and intermediates on the one hand and final products on the other hand in China, the impact on real economy, represented by real output and real investment, lasts much longer than that to price/monetary variables. Our decomposition results also show that the short-term impact, namely output decrease induced by the cut of capacity-utilization rate, is greater in the first one to two years, but the portion of the long-term impact, defined as the impact realized through an investment change, increases steadily and exceeds that of short-term impact at the end of the second year. Afterwards, the long-term impact dominates, and maintains for quite some time.
Cyclical Relationship between Oil Price and Inflation

Li Cheng,Wang Bin,Ma Wentao

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1002-4565.2010.04.004

2010-01-01

Abstract:The big fluctuation of oil price in recent years inevitably shocked the world economy to some degree. The paper studied the spillover effect between the international oil price and inflation under different economic circles on basis of Chinese and US data. In the case of mean spillover effect,the empirical result shows that only under short circle the effect between Chinese inflation and oil price is significant,while the spillover effects between US inflation and oil price are significant under most circles. In the case of volatility spillover effect,there is no such effect between Chinese inflation and oil price. However,the effect between US inflation and oil price are significant under most circles. Based on the empirical result,the paper gave some policy advices. It suggests that the Chinese government should continue the marketing process of domestic oil market and implement related policies to prepare for the future oil shock to macro economy.
Impact of Oil Price Shocks on China's Economy: A DSGE-based Analysis

Jian Zhi-hong,Li Shuang,Zheng Jun-yao

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/icmse.2010.5719986

2010-01-01

Abstract:This paper constructs a DSGE model to investigate the influences of oil price shocks on China's economy. Parameter estimation indicates that China's money supply mechanism does not target oil price shock, but makes a significant pro-cyclical response to output and a counter-cyclical reaction to inflation. It also shows that the persistence and volatility of oil price shocks are much stronger than that of other exogenous shocks. Impulse analysis exhibits that oil price shocks exert a lasting contraction effect on output and consumption, and meanwhile push inflation up. Furthermore, forecast error variance decomposition and historical decomposition reveal that the impact of oil price shock is stronger than other five shocks, and it is one of the main sources of China's economic fluctuation.
The Impact of Oil Price Shocks on the Stock Market Return and Volatility Relationship

Wensheng Kang,Ronald A. Ratti,Kyung Hwan Yoon

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2522667

2014-01-01

SSRN Electronic Journal

Abstract:This paper examines the impact of structural oil price shocks on the covariance of U.S. stock market return and stock market volatility. We construct from daily data on return and volatility the covariance of return and volatility at monthly frequency. The measures of daily volatility are realized-volatility at high frequency (normalized squared return), conditional-volatility recovered from a stochastic volatility model, and implied-volatility deduced from options prices. Positive shocks to aggregate demand and to oil-market specific demand are associated with negative effects on the covariance of return and volatility. Oil supply disruptions are associated with positive effects on the covariance of return and volatility. The spillover index between the structural oil price shocks and covariance of stock return and volatility is large and highly statistically significant.

Oil Shocks and Price Stability

Oil Price Shocks and Inflation Risk

Understanding the Large Negative Impact of Oil Shocks

Understanding the Impact of Oil Shocks

Oil Price Shocks and Macroeconomy

The Relationship Between Oil Price Shocks and China'S Macro-Economy: an Empirical Analysis

OPEC's Oil Exporting Strategy and Macroeconomic (In)stability

Dynamic Effects and Driving Intermediations of Oil Price Shocks on Major Economies

Influence of Sharp Fluctuation of Oil Price at a High Level on China's Economy in 2008

Oil Price Uncertainty and the Macroeconomy

Not All Oil Price Shocks Are Alike. A Replication of Kilian (American Economic Review, 2009)

Business cycles in the USA: the role of monetary policy and oil shocks

Transmissions of Structural Oil Shocks to Core Prices

Rising international crude oil prices and their macroeconomic impact on China, the U.S. and Japan

The Opec Oil Shock Crisis (1973): An Analysis

The 2006-2008 Oil Bubble and Beyond

Oil price regimes and their role in price diversions from market fundamentals

Oil Price Shocks and Their Short- and Long-Term Effects on the Chinese Economy

Cyclical Relationship between Oil Price and Inflation

Impact of Oil Price Shocks on China's Economy: A DSGE-based Analysis

The Impact of Oil Price Shocks on the Stock Market Return and Volatility Relationship