Abstract:The quest to answer the longstanding question of how safe is safe enough has led to an evolution of design philosophies. The traditional philosophy has been based on ensuring that system capacity exceeds demand. This philosophy has been manifested in such design methods as allowable stress design (ASD) and load and resistance factor design (LRFD). The level of safety in these methods is commonly calibrated to the acceptable practice using structural reliability methods. Such an approach to design aims to balance life safety and construction costs and works relatively well for service loads under which strength is nearly always a sufficient representative of system capacity. Under extreme loads, however, not only do factors such as ductility or energy-dissipation capacity come into play, but also the consequences of failure are vastly larger and may go beyond the failure site. For this reason, the more modern design philosophy of performance-based design emerged. According to this philosophy, a system is designed to meet a target performance, defined by limits on its performance metrics. These metrics were initially defined on structural responses, such as deformations and accelerations, and later evolved into risk measures based on monetary loss, downtime, and casualties. This philosophy is gradually making its way into modern design codes. Typical performance-based criteria focus primarily on what transpires during extreme loads. The need to incorporate the recovery of the system after such events has prompted the design philosophy to make another leap into resilience-based design (RBD). Resilience is defined herein as the ability to recover, within a predetermined period of time, in the aftermath of extreme events. Resilience transcends risk, i.e., a resilience analysis incorporates not only a risk analysis but also a recovery analysis. This paper provides a review of RBD in continuation of PBD and further introduces various applications of RBD into the design and assessment of civil infrastructure. The review covers the state of the art in resilience quantification approaches and associated computational platforms.

ASCE First Generation Testbed for Evaluating Resilience of Structures

Study on remote collaborative pseudo-dynamic tests of multi-story frames

Resilience-Based Design (Rbd) Modelling Of Civil Infrastructure To Assess Seismic Hazards

Battle of Postdisaster Response and Restoration

Development Of A Remote Hybrid Testing Platform For Bridge Structures

Resilience of critical structures, infrastructures and communities

Resilience-Based Design of Infrastructure: Review of Models, Methodologies, and Computational Tools

Disaster Resilience Assessment of Building and Transportation System

The Centerville Virtual Community: a fully integrated decision model of interacting physical and social infrastructure systems

Performance-based Engineering to Achieve Community Resilience

From Performance to Resilience-Based Design of Structures - Keynote Lecture

Seismic Performance Of Health Care Facilities Using Discrete Event Simulation Models

Resilience of Critical Infrastructure Systems: A Systematic Literature Review of Measurement Frameworks

Pseudo‐dynamic testing, repairability, and resilience assessment of a large‐scale steel structure equipped with self‐centering column bases

Framework for Analytical Quantification of Disaster Resilience

A Benchmark City for Seismic Resilience Assessment

Efficiency Assessment of Urban Road Networks Connecting Critical Node Pairs under Seismic Hazard

Seismic resilience of health care facilities

Utilizing Base-Isolation Systems to Increase Earthquake Resiliency of Healthcare and School Buildings

Resilience-incorporated seismic risk assessment of precast concrete frames with "dry" connections

Full‐scale hybrid test for realistic verification of a seismic upgrading technique of RC frames by BRBs