Abstract:Deep neural networks (DNNs) have achieved state-of-the-art performance in various learning tasks, such as computer vision, natural language processing, and speech recognition. However, the fundamental theory of generalization still remains obscure in deep learning-why DNN models can generalize well, despite that they are heavily overparametrized in both depth and width? Recently, some work shows that traditional theory of analyzing the generalization error of learning models fails to explain the generalization of DNNs. The failure is mainly because of one simple fact that the worse case analysis of generalization error for learning models would be too loose for models with large parameter space, such as DNNs. In this work, we propose a new analysis of generalization in DNNs from an optimal transport perspective. Unlike traditional worse-case uniform convergence analysis in learning theory, our analysis of generalization error is dependent on both the learning algorithm and the data distribution and is the average-case analysis. Thus, our theory can be more practical and accurate to describe the generalization behavior of DNNs. More specifically, in this article, we try to answer a fundamental yet unsolved question in deep learning-why deeper models can generalize well than shallow models? The main contribution of this article can be summarized in four aspects. First, under a general learning framework, we derive upper bounds on the generalization error of learning algorithms by their algorithmic transport cost: the expected Wasserstein distance between the output hypothesis and the output hypothesis conditioned on an input example. We further provide several upper bounds on the algorithmic transport cost in terms of total variation distance, relative entropy, and Vapnik-Chervonenkis (VC) dimension. Moreover, we also study different conditions for loss functions under which the generalization error of a learning algorithm can be upper bounded by different probability metrics between distributions relating to the output hypothesis and/or the input data. Finally, under our established framework, we obtain our main results, showing that the generalization error in DNNs decreases exponentially to zero as the number of layers increases.

Generalization Analysis For Ranking

Generalization Analysis of Listwise Learning-to-rank Algorithms

Two-Layer Generalization Analysis for Ranking Using Rademacher Average.

Statistical Learning Theory For Ranking

Fine-grained Generalization Analysis of Vector-valued Learning

Generalization bounds for regression and classification on adaptive covering input domains

Generalization Bounds For Meta-Learning: An Information-Theoretic Analysis

On Rank-Dependent Generalisation Error Bounds for Transformers

Query-level stability and generalization in learning to rank

Generalization Analysis for Game-Theoretic Machine Learning

Generalization Bounds for Metric and Similarity Learning

An Optimal Transport Analysis on Generalization in Deep Learning

On Generalization Bounds for Neural Networks with Low Rank Layers

An Information-Theoretic Approach to Generalization Theory

Fantastic Generalization Measures are Nowhere to be Found

Stable Rank Normalization for Improved Generalization in Neural Networks and GANs

Class-wise Generalization Error: an Information-Theoretic Analysis

An Optimal Transport View on Generalization.

1 Generalization in Classical Statistical Learning Theory

On the Generalization for Transfer Learning: An Information-Theoretic Analysis

Towards Optimal Problem Dependent Generalization Error Bounds in Statistical Learning Theory