Abstract:Forward collision warning (FCW) and autonomous emergency braking (AEB) systems are increasingly available and prevent or mitigate collisions by alerting the driver or autonomously braking the vehicle. Threat-assessment and decision-making algorithms for FCW and AEB aim to find the best compromise for safety by intervening at the "right" time: neither too early, potentially upsetting the driver, nor too late, possibly missing opportunities to avoid the collision. Today, the extent to which activation times for FCW and AEB should depend on factors such as pedestrian speed and lane width is unknown. To guide the design of FCW and AEB intervention time, we employed a fractional factorial design, and determined how seven factors (crossing side, car speed, pedestrian speed, crossing angle, pedestrian size, zebra-crossing presence, and lane width) affect the driver's response process and comfort zone when negotiating an intersection with a pedestrian. Ninety-four volunteers drove through an intersection in a fixed-base driving simulator, which was based on open-source software (OpenDS). Several parameters, including pedestrian time-to-arrival and driver response time, were calculated to describe the driver response process and define driver comfort boundaries. Linear mixed-effect models showed that driver responses depended mainly on pedestrian time-to-arrival and visibility, whereas factors such as pedestrian size, zebra-crossing presence, and lane width did not significantly influence the driver response process. Drivers released the accelerator pedal in 99.8 % of the trials and braked in 89 % of the trials. Forty-six percent of the drivers changed their negotiation strategy (proportion of pedal braking to engine braking) to minimize driving effort over the course of the experiment. In fact, 51 % of the of the inexperienced drivers changed their response strategy whereas only 40 % of the experienced drivers did; nevertheless, all drivers behaved similarly, independent of driving experience. The flexible and customizable driving environment provided by OpenDS may be a viable platform for behavioural experiments in driving simulators. Results from this study suggest that visibility and pedestrian time-to-arrival are the most important variables for defining the earliest acceptable FCW and AEB activations. Fractional factorial design effectively compared the influence of seven factors on driver behaviour within a single experiment; however, this design did not allow in-depth data analysis. In the future, OpenDS might become a standard platform, enabling crowdsourcing and favouring repeatability across studies in traffic safety. Finally, this study advises future design and evaluation procedures (e.g. new car assessment programs) for FCW and AEB by highlighting which factors deserve further investigation and which ones do not.

Driving Simulator Study for Drivers' Response Times under Rear-End Scenarios

Effect of Driving Experience on Collision Avoidance Braking: an Experimental Investigation and Computational Modelling

Analysis of Driver Response to Collision Warning During Car Following

Effectiveness of flashing brake and hazard systems in avoiding rear-end crashes

Driver operational level identification of driving risk and graded time-based alarm under near-crash conditions: A driving simulator study

Study on driver's active emergency response in dangerous traffic scenes based on driving simulator

Analysis of Driver Response Based on Natural Sensors and Driving Dataset

An improved automated braking system for rear-end collisions: A study based on a driving simulator experiment

An analysis of collision avoidance manoeuvres in emergency traffic situations

Study on older drivers' car following behavior and influencing factors

Analysis of Driver Brake Operation in Near-Crash Situation Using Naturalistic Driving Data

Collision Avoidance Behavior of Unalerted Drivers Using a Front-to-Rear-End Collision Warning Display on the Iowa Driving Simulator

Revealing driver psychophysiological response to emergency braking in distracted driving based on field experiments

Effects of Driver Gender, Driving Experience, and Visibility on Car-Following Behavior

Road Hazard Reaction Testing Using Driving Simulation: the Novice Vs. the Experienced Drivers

Effects of Lead Time of Verbal Collision Warning Messages on Driving Behavior in Connected Vehicle Settings.

Classification of longitudinal driving behaviour based on simulator study

Effects Of A Simulation-Based Training Intervention On Novice Drivers' Hazard Handling Performance

Analysis of drivers' deceleration behavior based on naturalistic driving data

How do drivers negotiate intersections with pedestrians? The importance of pedestrian time-to-arrival and visibility

Effect of Visual Instruction on Drivers' Reaction Pattern in Lateral Conflicts.