Risk Regulation and the " Faces " of Uncertainty

Vern R. Walker

1998-01-01

Abstract:Introduction The problem of “decision making in the face of uncertainty” is how to regulate on the basis of incomplete information that has significant potential to be inaccurate. My primary goal is to clarify some aspects of such decisionmaking through surveying types of uncertainty inherent in information. I present a taxonomy for kinds of inherent uncertainty — a classification and description of the “faces”of uncertainty. A second goal is to identify which kinds of uncertainty can and cannot now be measured quantitatively. A contextual assumption is that we need to evaluate decision rules for dealing with faces of uncertainty. As a social enterprise, risk regulation, whatever its substantive objectives, should be as effective, efficient and equitable as practically possible. These “three E’s” form a set of “process objectives” or “meta-goals.” First, risk regulation should be as effective as possible to maximize the likelihood of achieving a selected balance of risk taking and avoidance. Second, with regard to efficiency, we may, e.g., try to minimize adverse collateral consequences, maximize net benefits after accounting for costs, or use available resources cost-effectively. Third, the goal of equitable results is partly a concern for affected parties’ appropriate distribution of costs and benefits, and partly a respect for the potentially affected parties’ substantive and procedural rights. While these three meta-goals are distinct and complementary, they are also sometimes in tension. The optimal and most achievable blend of all three meta-goals depends upon circumstances surrounding each regulatory action. These meta-goals form an evaluative context for risk regulation and derivatively for regulatory factfinding. A necessary condition for