Abstract:Abstract Background The advent of metagenomic sequencing provides microbial abundance patterns that can be leveraged for sample origin prediction. Supervised machine learning classification approaches have been reported to predict sample origin accurately when the origin has been previously sampled. Using metagenomic datasets provided by the 2019 CAMDA challenge, we evaluated the influence of variable technical, analytical and machine learning approaches for result interpretation and novel source prediction. Results Comparison between 16S rRNA amplicon and shotgun sequencing approaches as well as metagenomic analytical tools showed differences in normalized microbial abundance, especially for organisms present at low abundance. Shotgun sequence data analyzed using Kraken2 and Bracken, for taxonomic annotation, had higher detection sensitivity. As classification models are limited to labeling pre-trained origins, we took an alternative approach using Lasso-regularized multivariate regression to predict geographic coordinates for comparison. In both models, the prediction errors were much higher in Leave-1-city-out than in 10-fold cross validation, of which the former realistically forecasted the increased difficulty in accurately predicting samples from new origins. This challenge was further confirmed when applying the model to a set of samples obtained from new origins. Overall, the prediction performance of the regression and classification models, as measured by mean squared error, were comparable on mystery samples. Due to higher prediction error rates for samples from new origins, we provided an additional strategy based on prediction ambiguity to infer whether a sample is from a new origin. Lastly, we report increased prediction error when data from different sequencing protocols were included as training data. Conclusions Herein, we highlight the capacity of predicting sample origin accurately with pre-trained origins and the challenge of predicting new origins through both regression and classification models. Overall, this work provides a summary of the impact of sequencing technique, protocol, taxonomic analytical approaches, and machine learning approaches on the use of metagenomics for prediction of sample origin.

Binning Dna Fragment Of Metagenome Using A Novel Model

Gene Prediction by the Noise-Assisted MEMD and Wavelet Transform for Identifying the Protein Coding Regions

Exploiting Topic Modeling to Boost Metagenomic Reads Binning.

Random Fragments Classification of Microbial Marker Clades with Multi-class SVM and N-Best Algorithm

A New Unsupervised Binning Approachfor Metagenomic Sequences Based onN-grams and Automatic Feature Weighting.

Classification of bacterial plasmid and chromosome derived sequences using machine learning

Gene Prediction in Metagenomic Fragments Based on the SVM Algorithm

Large-scale Machine Learning for Metagenomics Sequence Classification

Binning Metagenomic Contigs Using Contig Embedding and Decomposed Tetranucleotide Frequency

A new metagenome binning method based on gene uniqueness

MetaBinner: a High-Performance and Stand-Alone Ensemble Binning Method to Recover Individual Genomes from Complex Microbial Communities

SMeta, a binning tool using single-cell sequences to aid in reconstructing species from metagenome accurately

CompostBin: A DNA composition-based algorithm for binning environmental shotgun reads

Distance-based support vector machine to predict DNA N6-methyladenine modification

MetaDecoder: a novel method for clustering metagenomic contigs

Low-density locality-sensitive hashing boosts metagenomic binning

Benchmarking DNA Foundation Models for Genomic Sequence Classification

Binning meets taxonomy: TaxVAMB improves metagenome binning using bi-modal variational autoencoder

Systematic evaluation of supervised machine learning for sample origin prediction using metagenomic sequencing data

MetaBinG2: a fast and accurate metagenomic sequence classification system for samples with many unknown organisms