Abstract:We study endogenous merger decisions among three competing firms with asymmetric capacity: One large firm has ample capacity, and two small firms have limited capacity. Each firm can either operate independently or merge with another firm. Due to antitrust laws, all three firms merging is not permitted. When two firms merge, the merged entity and the remaining independent firm use the resulting capacity to capture their own "loyal buyers" and compete in price for price-sensitive "disloyal switchers". We first consider a base model where the size of loyal buyers for different firms is symmetric. We find that either there is no merger or the large firm will merge with a small firm (called mixed merger). We explain how the equilibrium structure is driven by the "price effect" and the "demand effect". Specifically, the mixed merger which can most effectively reduce price competition is the equilibrium for relatively competitive market conditions (i.e., small size of loyal buyers and large but constrained capacity). We also extend to the case with asymmetric size of loyal segments, and show that two small firms merging can be the equilibrium structure when the large firm has a much larger loyal segment than the small firms and the small firms' capacity is sufficiently large. The impacts of mergers on social welfare and consumer surplus provide practical implications from the antitrust perspective. The antitrust agencies who are concerned about social welfare can approve a mixed merger under certain conditions, but if the agencies pay more attention to consumer surplus, then mixed mergers should not be permitted. Small mergers, though sometimes are not the equilibrium structures, can improve both social welfare and consumer surplus. In such cases, the government can appropriately promote mergers that are beneficial for society and/or consumers by adopting some restrictive measures or offering incentives.

Privatization and merger in a mixed oligopoly with spatial price discrimination

Public Firms on an International Border: A Model of Spatial Price Discrimination

Privatization in mixed duopoly with vertical differentiation: Price versus quantity competition

Imported Inputs and Privatization in Downstream Mixed Oligopoly with Foreign Ownership

Political Economy Model of Cross‐Border Mergers under Mixed Oligopoly

The Competition of Investments for Endogenous Transportation Costs in A Spatial Model

Privatization and Environmental Pollution in A Mixed Duopoly

Urban/rural spatial price discrimination with online competition

Privatization, pollution, and welfare in a mixed differentiated duopoly

To List or to Merge? Endogenous Choice of Privatization Methods in a Mixed Market

Environmental Taxes under Mixed Duopoly: the Roles of Privatization and Foreign Eco-Technology

Alliance Formation among Competitors: Impact of Limited Capacity and Loyal Segments

The Optimal Privatization Policies under an International Mixed Duopoly

Social Heterogeneity and Optimal Mix Between Public and Private Provision of Public Goods

Mixed duopoly in two‐sided markets

On the bright side of market concentration in a mixed-oligopoly healthcare industry

Optimal policy choice and asymmetric information in a mixed market

On comparing the profitability of horizontal mergers under Cournot and Bertrand competitions

COMPETITIVE PRIVATIZATION AND TARIFF POLICIES IN AN INTERNATIONAL MIXED DUOPOLY*

Spatial Competition and Social Welfare Considering Different Feasible Location Regions

Privatization, Unemployment, and Welfare in the Harris-Todaro Model with a Mixed Duopoly