Abstract:Yi Hong 1 , Yunpeng Zhu 2 , Yunpeng Ling 1 1 Department of Cardiac Surgery, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China; 2 Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Ruijin Hospital Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China Comment on: Jung YC, Chong Y, Kang MW, et al . Clipless internal mammary artery harvesting for minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting using the shear-tip harmonic scalpel. J Thorac Dis 2024;16:3711-21. Keywords: Harmonic scalpel; shear tip; minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting (minimally invasive CABG); skeletalization; internal mammary artery (IMA) Submitted Aug 01, 2024. Accepted for publication Oct 16, 2024. Published online Nov 29, 2024. doi: 10.21037/jtd-24-1226 In contemporary coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), the left internal mammary artery (IMA) graft to the left anterior descending (LAD) artery has become the gold standard procedure (1,2). Compared to the great saphenous vein grafts (SVGs), IMA grafts demonstrate significantly lower failure (stenosis or occlusion) rates at both 5- and 10-year follow-ups, as well as better clinical outcomes (3,4). However, early failure of IMA grafts can significantly affect clinical outcomes. Harskamp et al. conducted a study involving 1,539 patients and found that those with IMA graft failure faced a significantly higher risk of acute events—such as death, myocardial infarction, or revascularization—within 14 days [14.4% vs. 4.9%; hazard ratio (HR) 3.92; 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.30–6.68; P<0.0001]. This trend of increased adverse events associated with IMA graft failure persisted for over four years, although it was not statistically significant (HR 1.45; 95% CI: 0.85–2.48; P=0.17) (5). Among the various factors influencing IMA graft failure, the techniques used for harvesting (pedicle vs. skeletonized) and the quality of anastomosis are of paramount importance. Currently, IMA graft harvesting techniques can be categorized into skeletonized and pedicle techniques. Early on, Boodhwani et al. conducted a randomized controlled trial (RCT) involving 48 patients, which revealed that skeletonized IMA harvesting, compared to pedicle harvesting, showed a trend towards increased IMA graft length (18.2±0.3 vs. 17.7±0.3 cm, P=0.09), reduced postoperative pain levels at three months, and significantly decreased major sensory deficits at both the four-week and three-month follow-ups (17% vs. 50%, P=0.002) (6). Subsequent studies over the decades have further demonstrated several advantages of IMA skeletonization. A meta-analysis encompassing 31 studies reported that skeletonized harvesting, in comparison to pedicle harvesting, resulted in significantly lower odds of sternal wound infection (SWI) [odds ratio (OR) 0.45; 95% CI: 0.32–0.66; P=0.0001], a longer conduit [weighted mean difference (WMD) −2.48; 95% CI: −3.75 to −1.20; P=0.0001], and a higher postoperative flow rate (WMD −13.11; 95% CI: −22.52 to −3.70; P=0.006) (7). Similar outcomes have also been reported by several other meta-analyses and systematic reviews, although some studies found no significant difference in SWI rates between pedicle and skeletonized harvesting (8,9). However, whether skeletonized IMA harvesting can improve graft patency and provide better safety for patients remains debatable. A meta-analysis involving 5 studies and 1,764 patients showed no significant difference in postoperative graft occlusion rates between pedicle and skeletonized IMA grafts (10). Whereas Lamy et al. analyzed the CABG cohort of the COMPASS trial involving 27,395 patients and found that skeletonized IMA had a higher occlusion rate at 1-year post-CABG compared to pedicle harvesting (9.6% vs. 3.9%; graft-level adjusted OR 2.41; P=0.002). During the 23-month follow-up, patients with skeletonized IMA grafts had significantly higher major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) rates (7.1% vs. 2.1%; adjusted HR 3.19; P=0.002) and repeat revascularization rates (5.0% vs. 1.4%; adjusted HR 2.75; P=0.03) compared to those with pedicle IMA (11). Similarly, Gaudino's 10-year follow-up data of 2,161 patients showed a higher long-term MACE risk with skeletonized IMA grafts (HR 1.25; 95% CI: 1.06–1.47; P=0.01). It is noteworthy that this difference was not significant among surgeons with more than 51 surgeries, suggesting that the prognosis of skeletonized IMA is associated with the surgeon's proficiency (12). In contrast to MACE, several studies have shown no significant difference in all-cause mortality rates between skeletonized and pedicle IMA over a 10-year follow-up (12,13). Therefore, the clinical outcomes of skeletonized IMA harvesting are also dependent on the surgeon's expertise. In current guidelines and pr -Abstract Truncated-

E0407 Results of Skeletonised BIMA in Combination with GEA in CABG

Application of Bilateral Internal Mammary Artery with Different Configurations in Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Graft flow analysis of application of bilateral internal mammary artery with different configurations in coronary artery bypass grafting

Predominant Use of Bilateral Internal Mammary Arteries in Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery

Revascularization of Left Anterior Descending Artery Area Using a Skeletonized Left Internal Mammary Artery: a Comparison Between Sequential and Separate Grafting

Comparative Study of Minimally Invasive Directly Bypass Grafting With Bilateral Internal Mammary Artery and Conventional Off-pump Bypass Grafting for Treating Multi-vessel Lesion Coronary Artery Disease

Revascularization of Left Coronary System Using a Skeletonized Left Internal Mammary Artery - Sequential Vs. Separate Grafting.

In Situ Skeletonized Right Internal Mammary Artery Bypass Grafting to Left Anterior Descending Artery.

Mid-term Graft Patency of Right Versus Left Internal Mammary Artery As Arterial Conduit Usage for Left Anterior Descending Artery Revascularisation: Insights from a Single-Centre Study of Propensity-Matched Data.

Utilization of Vein Grafts in Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: Reasons and Outcomes in a Bilateral Mammary Artery First Center

Sequential Grafting of in Situ Skeletonized Left Internal Mammary Artery to the Left Coronary System.

Early experience of minimally invasive coronary surgery with bilateral internal mammary artery

Single-center usage of right internal mammary artery in coronary artery bypass grafting

Off-pump Skeletonized Versus Pedicled Left Internal Mammary Artery Grafting: Mid-term Results.

Long Term Survival Benefits of Different Conduits Used in Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery- A Single Institutional Practice Over 20 Years

Sequential composite BIMA grafting for 3v-CAD: factors that predict successful outcome of the one-inflow and two-inflow revascularization techniques

Minimally Invasive Direct Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting with an Improved Rib Spreader and a New-Shaped Cardiac Stabilizer: Results of 200 Consecutive Cases in a Single Institution

Impacts of Skeletonized Bilateral Internal Mammary Artery Bypass Grafting on the Risk of Deep Sternal Wound Infection.

Utilizing the ultrasonic shear for internal mammary artery harvesting in minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting surgery is worth considering

Association of HbA1c and utilization of internal mammary arteries with wound infections in CABG

Off-pump bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting in patients with left main coronary artery disease